Case law

Walden v. Hughes

61 O.B.A.J. 2638 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 9, 1990

See Todoroff v. Burton, 719 P.2d 456, 457 (Okla.1986). The present action is one to quiet title and for injunctive relief. … Burk v. City of Oklahoma City, 598 P.2d 659, 660 (Okla.1979).

BARNETT v. OKAY PUBLIC WORKS AUTHORITY

2022 OK 24 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 8, 2022

OSCN Found Document:BARNETT v. OKAY PUBLIC WORKS AUTHORITY BARNETT v. … In 2009, OPWA began a sanitary system improvement project with public funds obtained from the Oklahoma Water Resources Board.

Miller v. Ury

23 Okla. 546 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 12, 1909

By the decree defendants were commanded, as members of the county election board of Muskogee county, to place and print the name of plaintiff as a candidate for the nomination of alderman in the First ward of the city of … The decisions of the court upon this question are well collected in Albright et al. v. Erickson, ante, p. 444, 102 Pac. 112 . Parsons v. Tetirick, 63 Kan. 879 , 64 Pac. 1028 , is a case in point.

Crowder State Bank v. Aetna Powder Co.

41 Okla. 394 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 23, 1913

(Parish v. Wheeler, 22 N. Y. 509 .) … (State Board v. Citizens' St. Ry. Co., 47 Ind. 407 , 17 Am. Rep. 702 .) “At the present time, the defense of ultra vires is very generally regarded by the courts as an ungracious arid odious one.

Independent Finance Institute v. Clark

70 O.B.A.J. 3342 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 4, 1999

Co. of Okla. v. State ex rel. Corp. Com’n, 1992 OK 153, ¶ 8 , 842 P.2d 750, 752 . 26 . Tate v. Browning-Ferris, Inc., 1992 OK 72 , ¶ 15, 833 P.2d 1218, 1228 ; State ex rel. Macy v. … Oklahoma Tax Com’n, see note 31, supra; Texas County Irrigation & Water Resources Ass’n v. Oklahoma Water Resources Bd., see note 31, supra; Board of Educ. v. Morris, see note 31, supra; Magnolia Pipe Line. Co. v.

Grady Cty. v. Chickasha Cotton Oil Co. State v. Same

63 Okla. 201 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 10, 1917

County Com’rs of Kingfisher County v. Guaranty State Bank, 27 Okla. 756 , 117 Pac. 216 ; Asher State Bank v. Bd. County Com’rs, 31 Okla. 145 , 120 Pac. 634 ; State et al. v. … As was held in one of those cases (Parmenter v.

Anderson v. Ferguson and Zaring

12 Okla. 307 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 4, 1902

(See also the following: McDonald v. Stiles, 7 Okla. 327 ; Kirtley v. Dykes 10 Okla. 16 ; Cope v. Braden, 11 Okla. 291 , 67 Pac. 475 ; and cases cited.) … (Also, see case of Bradford v.

Payne, County Treas. v. Jones

193 Okla. 609 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 15, 1944

He calls our attention to Dove v. Oglesby, 114 Okla. 144 , 244 P. 798 , and Board of County Commissioners v. … Co. v. Board of Public Works, 172 U. S. 32 , 43 L. Ed. 354 , 19 S. Ct. 90 ; Port Angeles R. Co. v. Clallam County, 20 Fed. 2d 202.

Burtner v. Wilkins

201 Okla. 372 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 10, 1949

Durham v. Brown, 164 Okla. 139 , 24 P. 2d 295 .

Cosden Pipe Line Co. v. Berry

87 Okla. 237 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 25, 1922

Co. v. Wilson, 17 Okla. 355, 87 Pac. 320 ; Okla. Poland *243 Cement Co. v. Brown, 45 Okla. 476 , 146 Pac. 6 ; Ft. Smith & W. Ry. Co. v. Ketis, 26 Okla. 696 , 110 Pac. 661 ; Sulzberger & Sons Co. v. … Brown (Ore.) 101 Pac. 671 ; Carilla v. U. S. Const. & Finance Co. (Kan.) 106 Pac. 1050 ; St. Louis & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Johnson (Kan.) 86 Pac. 156 ; Webber v. Wichita Water Co.

State Ex Rel. Lee v. Chaney

23 Okla. 788 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 12, 1910

Board of Com’rs, 41 W. Va. 471 , 23 S. E. 804 ; Fuller v. Ellis, 98 Mich. 96 , 57 N. W. 33 ; People ex rel. Clay v. Stuart, 74 Mich. 411 , 41 N. W. 1091 , 16 Am. St. Rep. 644 ; Dullam v. Willson, 53 Mich. 392 , 19 N. … Rep. 128 ; People v. Nichols, 79 N. Y. 582 ; Commonwealth v. Slifer, 25 Pa. 27 , 64 Am. Dec. 680 ; Board of Aldermen of Denver v. Darrow, 13 Colo. 460 , 22 Pac. 784 , 16 Am. St. Rep. 215 ; State ex rel. Denison v.

Teague v. State Industrial Commission

112 Okla. 292 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 27, 1925

that neither the bottle-washers nor the delive/ry man was present at the scene of the accident is not material in determining whether more than one workman was employed. ’Petitioner contends, under Southwestern Grocery Co. v. … This contention is untenable under Brown v. Sinclair Refining Co., 86 Okla. 143 , 206 Pac. 1042 , and Merrick & Coe v. Modlin et al., 88 Okla. 83 , 211 Pac. 510 .

State Ex Rel. Hunt v. Liberty Investors Life Insurance Co.

543 P.2d 1390 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 16, 1975

In Porter v. … In Sautbine v.

Oklahoma City Golf & Country Club v. Oklahoma Tax Commission

63 O.B.A.J. 292 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 28, 1992

On March 27,1989, the board of directors of the Club sent a letter to the members informing them that board was recommending an assessment of $1,140,000 to fund several improvements to enhance the physical facilities of the … Standard Oil Co. v. Tennessee, 217 U.S. 413, 420 , 30 S.Ct. 543, 543-44 , 54 L.Ed. 817 (1910); Wilson & Co. v. Hickey, 186 Okla. 324, 325 , 97 P.2d 564, 566 (1940).

Johnson v. Southwestern Battery Company

411 P.2d 526 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 8, 1966

Callahan v. Graves, 37 Okl. 503 , 132 P. 474 , 46 L.R.A.,N.S., 350; Cressler v. Brown, 79 Okl. 170 , 192 P. 417 ; Garrison v. Bonham, 207 Okl. 599 , 251 P.2d 790 ; Wilkey v. … Cantrell, who with the aid and counsel of Marion Baker and Paul Brown, as Special Masters, prepared a preliminary advisory opinion.

Braun v. Stillwater Advance Printing & Publishing Co.

22 Okla. 620 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 16, 1908

Abstract or hypothetical cases, disconnected with the granting of actual relief, or from the determination of which no practical result can follow, will not be determined by this court, Harman v. … Burt, 20 Okla. 509 , 94 Pac. 528 ; Parker et al. v. Territory ex rel Bostic, 20 Okla. 851 , 94 Pac. 175 Freeman v. Board of Medical Examiners, 20 Okla. 610 , 95 Pac. 229 .

Cherokee Mills v. Lewis

89 Okla. 241 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 8, 1923

Bank v. Ulrich, 81 Okla. 159 , 197 Pac. 167 ; Stinchcomb v. Oklahoma City, 81 Okla. 102 , 197 Pac. 437 ; Harrison v. M. Koehler Co., 82 Okla. 26 , 198 Pac. 206 ; Obialero v. … Henryetta Spelter Co., 82 Okla. 274 , 200 Pac. 143 ; Russell & *242 Washington v. Robertson, 82 Okla. 283 , 200 Pac. 150 ; Incorporated Town of Kusa v. Bouggous, 82 Okla. 204 , 200 Pac. 154 ; W. G. Brown v. C. M.

Bell v. Fitzpatrick

53 Okla. 574 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 29, 1916

Co. v. Board, supra. … Truskett v. Closser, supra; Barbre v. Hood, supra; Walker et al. v. Brown, 43 Okla. 144 , 141 Pac. 681 ; In re Allen’s Will, 44 Okla. 392 , 144 Pac. 1055 .

Shirley v. National Tank Co.

203 Okla. 508 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 24, 1950

In Standard Paving Co. v. … Natol v. Booth & Flinn Co., 139 Okla. 103 , 281 P. 264 ; Consolidated Pipe Line Co. v. Mahon, 152 Okla. 72 , 3 P. 2d 844 ; State Highway Commission v. Koon, 185 Okla. 161 , 90 P. 2d 889 .”

State v. Lynch

61 O.B.A.J. 2102 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 24, 1990

Brown v. State, 677 P.2d 1089, 1091 (Okla. Crim.App.1984); Johnson v. State, 599 P.2d 416, 418 (Okla.Crim.App.1979). . Title 30 O.S.Supp.1988 § 3-107 provides in pertinent part: "A. … Recently, in Federal Trade Comm. v.