Case law

Litchfield v. Henson Oil Co.

53 Okla. 550 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 21, 1915

Bank v. … Clark & Marshall on Corporations, p. 1820; Western *557 Union v. Davenport, 97 U. S. 369 , 24 L. Ed. 1047 ; Barstow v. Savage Min. Co., 64 Cal. 388 , 1 Pac. 349 , 49 Am. Rep. 705 .

Barnett v. Kennedy

185 Okla. 409 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 5, 1938

Co. v. … In Stevens v. Selma Fruit Co. (Cal.

Baggett v. Webb

557 P.2d 433 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 23, 1976

The Trask case, supra, was followed in Frank v. … Appellee also cites Oklahoma Department of Public Safety v.

Spivey & McGill v. Nixon

163 Okla. 278 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 9, 1933

In Pine v. … We call attention to the decision of this court in Rorabaugh-Brown Dry Goods Co. v. Mathews, 162 Okla. 283 , 20 P. (2d) 141 , for an additional discussion of the -issues presented.

Edward C. Plume Co. v. Bankston

75 Okla. 157 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 15, 1919

In Bunker v. … Brown, 69 Oklahoma, 172 Pac. 79 ; Freeman v King, 66 Oklahoma, 168 Pac. 436 ; Shawnee National Bank v. Pool, 66 Oklahoma, 167 Pac. 994 . The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Carter v. McCauley

97 Okla. 255 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 6, 1923

Carter, State Auditor, v. Rector et al., 88 Okla. 12 , 210 Pac. 1035 , is 'decisive of the case at bar. It will be seen by comparison that the facts are very similar. … ad valorem, and the remedy and proceedings before the State Auditor shall be the same as those provided for reviewing assessments of property ad valorem by the county board of equalization.

Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Long

122 Okla. 86 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 7, 1926

In Wonacott v. … In Hoskins v. Baxter, 66 N.

General Hotel Op. Co., Inc. v. Hunter

192 Okla. 677 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 29, 1943

Plaintiff alleged that defendant agreed to pay her a salary of *678 $50 per month, room and board, and a reasonable commission on the gross income of the business, provided that under her management and control she could … J., GIBSON, V. C. J., and OSBORN, WELCH, HURST, DAVISON, and ARNOLD, JJ., concur. BAYLESS, J., absent.

MacThwaite Oil & Gas Co. v. Bolen

77 Okla. 155 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 23, 1919

In Pioneer Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. … In Morrison v.

C. C. Julian Oil & Royalties Co. v. Capshaw

145 Okla. 237 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 14, 1930

Ohio Oil Co. v. Indiana, 177 U.S. 190 ." In the case of Walls v. … Brown v. Miller et al., 89 Okla. 287 , 215 P. 748 ." On page 158 the court said: "We are clearly of the opinion that the Act of 1915, supra, is a valid act.

Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. Richardson

25 Okla. 640 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 8, 1910

; Railroad Co. v. … Co. v. Tidewater R. Co., 105 Va. 129 , 52 S. E. 852 .)

Brewer v. Asher

8 Okla. 231 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 11, 1899

.: The principal proposition involved in this case was considered and determined in Commissioners v. … The claim being disallowed by the board, he appealed to the district court.

Ensley v. Goins

192 Okla. 587 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 18, 1943

School District No. 37 v. Latimer, 190 Okla. 620 , 126 P. 2d 280 , and Oliver v. State, supra. … J. 208-209 purporting to state a general rule such as petitioners contend for; but when we read the decisions (Board of Ed. v. Board of Ed., 121 Ohio, 213, 167 N. E. 872 , and People v. Moyer, 298 Ill. 143 , 131 N.

Lewis v. Allen

42 Okla. 584 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 28, 1914

Dodge v. Crandall, 30 N. Y. 294, 304 ; Brown v. Farmer's Loan & T. Co., 117 N. Y. 266, 273 [ 22 N. E. 952 ] ; Madden v. Floyd, 69 Ala. 221, 225 ; Gordon v. Tweedy, 71 Ala. 202, 214 ; Huntley v. Huntley, 114 U. … Ed. 130, 131 ; Browne, Stat. Er. sec. 116.

Consolidated Pipe Line Co. v. Mahon

152 Okla. 72 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 6, 1931

In the Scotch case of Rodger v. Paisley School Board (1912) S. … Co. v.

Wells v. Territory of Oklahoma

15 Okla. 195 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 11, 1905

.: The defendant in error, Matt Wells, was jsintly indicted with one Opie Brown, upon the charge of the *196 larceny of a gelding. … The same question was before this court in the case of Martin v.

Turner v. State Industrial Commission

174 Okla. 486 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 8, 1935

Corp. v. … Brown v. English, 159 Okla. 208 , 15 P. (2d) 17 ; Haynes Bros. Drilling Co. v. Dungan, 158 Okla. 263 , 13 P. (2d) 197 ; Bryant v. Beason, 153 Okla. 57 , 4 P. (2d) 1061 .

O'BALLIET v. Lillard

205 Okla. 467 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 11, 1951

Board of Adjustment, 193 Okla. 141 , 141 P. 2d. 800, Protest of Sweeney, 183 Okla. 211 , 80 P. 2d. 582, and Burgin v. Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp., 188 Okla. 645 , 112 P. 2d 802 , is controlling. … All involve appeals from special boards where permits are sought, or a review of some proceedings from a special court. In Burgin v.

Hamilton v. Barber

474 P.2d 399 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 8, 1970

Board of Adjustment v. Shanbour, Okl., 435 P.2d 569 ; Thompson v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 194 Okl. 77 , 147 P.2d 451 . See also 11 O.S. 1961 , Sec. 407, and Sec. 13.19.05B, Revised Ordinances of Oklahoma City. … In the journal entry of judgment, the trial court found in effect that the applicants had met the burden of proof under which they labored by virtue of the cited rule from Board of Adjustment v.

Ward v. Oklahoma Tax Commission

73 O.B.A.J. 1114 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 2, 2002

Ward, V. Glenn Coffee, E. Scott Pruitt, Thad H. Balkman and Kevin J. … Continental Oil Co. v. Oklahoma State Bd. of Equalization, 1976 OK 23, 17 , 570 P.2d 315 . The application to assume original jurisdiction and petition for writ of mandamus should be denied.