Case law

LEO v. OKLAHOMA WATER RESOURCES BOARD

2023 OK 96 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 3, 2023

LEO v. … The Board members heard argument from each party at the Board meeting prior to the vote.

Brown v. Tulsa Exposition and Fair Corporation

429 P.2d 767 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 27, 1967

Co. v. … In Towery v.

State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Brown

773 P.2d 751 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 16, 1989

On that same date, the respondent received a check made payable to Cliff Amero d/b/a/ Cliff’s Auto Sales and Dan Brown. … Oklahoma Bar Ass’n v. Lowe, 640 P.2d 1361 (Okla.1982); State ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass’n v. Bishop, 556 P.2d 1276 (Okla.1976); State ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass’n v. Smith, 510 P.2d 936 (Okla.1973); and State ex rel.

GENTGES v. OKLAHOMA STATE ELECTION BOARD

419 P.3d 224 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 8, 2018

Swindall v. … Munro v.

Arnold v. Board of County Com'rs

124 Okla. 42 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 15, 1926

App. 130 ; Morrison v. Fid. & Dep. Co. of Md. (Ga.) 102 S. E. 354 . Bantley v. Baker et al. (Neb.) 84 N. W. 603 ; Schearman v. Com. (Ky.) 38 S. W. 146 . … This item was included in the judgment which the trial court rendered in fav- or of the board of county commissioners. The court in ihe Frear Case refers to State v.

St. Louis & S. F. R. Co. v. Brown

45 Okla. 143 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 22, 1914

Co. v. Blue, 46 Tex. Civ. App. 239 , 102 S. W. 128 ; McDonnell v. Pescadero Stage Co., 120 Cal. 476 , 52 Pac. 725 ; Barton v. Holmes, 16 Iowa, 252 ; Kennedy v. Kennedy, 18 N. J. Law, 450; Tinkle v. … Colcord v. Conger, 10 Okla. 458 , 62 Pac. 276; Barnes v. Territory, 19 Okla. 373 , 91 Pac. 848 ; Pitchlynn v. Cherry, 32 Okla. 77 , 121 Pac. 196 ; Tulsa St. Ry. Co. v. Jacobson, 40 Okla. 118 , 136 Pac. 410 ; Glockner v.

Excise Board, Washita County v. Lowden

189 Okla. 286 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 8, 1941

In Herndon v. Excise Board of Garfield County et al., 147 Okla. 126 , 295 P. 223 , this court decided that when such a preliminary report of census was made it was official and a guide for public conduct. … Board of Com’rs of Coal County v. Mathews, 147 Okla. 296 , 296 P. 481 ; Elliott et al. v. State ex rel. Kirkpatrick, 150 Okla. 275 , 1 P. 2d 370 .

Reherman v. Oklahoma Water Resources Board

679 P.2d 1296 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 5, 1984

Kimery v. Public Service Co. of Oklahoma, 622 P.2d 1066 (Okl.1980); Earnest, Inc. v. LeGrand, 621 P.2d 1148 (Okl.1980). … Draper v. State, 621 P.2d 1142, 1146 (Okl.1980).

Finley v. Board of County Commissioners

291 P.2d 333 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 8, 1955

This action was commenced by the Board of County Commissioners of Oklahoma County, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, against Robert W. … Newell v. Musgrove, 129 Okl. 207 , 264 P. 156 ; Collum v. Stokes, 146 Okl. 176 , 293 P. 1036 ; Grayson v. Brown, 166 Okl. 43 , 26 P.2d 204 .

Sharp v. Tulsa County Election Board

66 O.B.A.J. 350 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 31, 1995

Storer v. Brown, 415 U.S. 724, 730 , 94 S.Ct. 1274,1279 , 39 L.Ed.2d 714 (1974); see also Burdick, 504 U.S. at -, 112 S.Ct. at 2063 . … In Storer v. Brown, 415 U.S. 724 , 94 S.Ct. 1274 , 39 L.Ed.2d 714 (1973), the Supreme Court upheld several California regulations which set eligibility requirements.

Board of Ed. v. Calvert

162 Okla. 121 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 21, 1933

Therefore, had the board of education in the first instance loaned its money to the makers of the original notes they would have been in no position to question the authority of the board to make the loan. In Housum v. … Ewing v. Bd. of Com’rs, 53 Okla. 250 , 156 P. 229 ; First Nat. Bank v. Womack, 56 Okla. 359 , 156 P. 207 ; Citizens State Bank v. Drumright State Bank, 116 Okla. 213 , 244 P. 178 .

Speaker v. Board of County Commissioners

312 P.2d 438 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 30, 1957

See Executive Committee of American Legion, Dept. of Okl. v. Hardy, Okl., 300 P.2d 663 , together with the authorities therein cited; and Pitts v. … Oklahoma City School Dist. of Oklahoma County, 163 Okl. 245 , 22 P.2d 915 ; Caldwell v. Traub, 172 Okl. 12 , 43 P.2d 1047 . Notice also State ex rel. Stephens v.

Johnson v. Board of County Commissioners

7 Okla. 686 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 11, 1899

(Rollins v. Board, 33 C. C. A. 181 , 90 Fed. 575 ; Town-Lot Co. v. Lane, [S. D.] 65 N. W. 17 ; Board v. Standley, [Colo. Sup.] 49 Pac. 23 ; People v. Board of Com’rs of Rio Grande Co., [Colo. … App.] 52 Pac. 748 ; Wilder v. Board, 41 Fed. 512 .) In Rollins v.

State ex rel. Board of Education v. State Board of Education

295 P.2d 279 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 25, 1955

Boards of Education of Independent School Districts No. 1-2 and No. 1-3 of Marshall County, Oklahoma v. … J., and WELCH, CORN, DAVISON, HALLEY and HUNT, JJ., concur. ■ WILLIAMS, V. C. J., and BLACKBIRD, J., dissent.

City of Ardmore v. Excise Board

155 Okla. 126 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 26, 1932

In Board of Education of the City of Guthrie v. … Under the record shown in Excise Board of Creek County v. State ex rel.

Draper v. State Board of Equalization

414 P.2d 276 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 10, 1966

In re Application of State to Issue Bonds, etc., 33 Okl. 797 , 127 P. 1065 ; Davis v. Childers, 181 Okl. 468 , 74 P.2d 930 ; Schmoldt v. … This was done in the instant case by the Board on June 11, 1965.

Cavett v. Geary Board of Education

587 P.2d 991 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 5, 1978

unambiguous and its meaning clear and no occasion exists for the application of rules of construction, the statute will be accorded the meaning as expressed by the language therein employed; Seventeen Hundred Peoria, Inc. v. … Where the language of a statute is plain and unambiguous, there is no room for construction thereof; Forston v. Heisler, Okl., 363 P.2d 949 . The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. All Justices concur. 1 .

Fletcher v. Board of County Commissioners

285 P.2d 183 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 15, 1955

State v. State ex rel. Shull, 142 Okl. 293 , 286 P. 891 . … The following language used in the case of Lockard v.

Gentges v. Oklahoma State Election Board

319 P.3d 674 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 11, 2014

Coffee v. … Swindall v. State Election Board, 1984 OK 259 , ¶0, 168 Okla. 97 , 32 P.2d 691 (syllabus 1).

McKee v. Adair County Election Board

36 Okla. 258 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 26, 1912

Montgomery v. … Shepard v.