Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersokla

10,000+ results

1.09s

  • STATE OF OKLAHOMA ex rel. OBA v. BROWN

    2025 OK 52 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 8, 2025

    OBA v. BROWN Previous Case Top Of Index This Point in Index Citationize Next Case Print Only STATE OF OKLAHOMA ex rel. OBA v. … OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION, Complainant, v. JESSICA LYN BROWN, Respondent. ORDER APPROVING RESIGNATION FROM OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION PENDING DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS ¶1 Complainant State of Oklahoma ex rel.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Sigmon v. Rorabaugh-Brown Dry Goods Co.

    110 Okla. 17 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 9, 1925

    Stat. 1921; Baker-Hanna-Blake Co. v. Paynter, McVicker Gro. Co., 73 Okla. 22 , 174 Pac. 265 ; Staver Carriage Co. v. Jones. 32 Okla. 713 , 123 Pac. 148 ; Eastman Land & Inv. Co. v. Long-Bell Lbr. … Malanaphy v. Fuller & Johnson Mfg. Co. (Ia.) 101 N. W. 640 , 106 A. S. R. 332.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Sherrill v. Board of Trustees

    515 P.2d 1388 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 26, 1973

    In Independent School District No. 1, McIntosh County v. Howard, Old., 336 P. 2d 1097 , we quoted with approval Consolidated School Dist. v. … Although the governing board of the “area school district” is the Board of Trustees of the Community Junior College this does not effect a merger of the two entities or create any conflict of interests. Woodward v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Coates

    87 Okla. 271 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 21, 1922

    Brown to recover for services performed under an oral contract. … Board of County Commissioners of Garvin County, 82 Okla. 178 , 198 Pac. 851 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Morgan

    24 Okla. 235 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 13, 1909

    of indebtedness by Brown, on January 2, 1908, there was judgment for plaintiff and against defendants for $151.05 debt and $15 attorney’s fees, from which said judgment Brown alone appealed to the county court of that county … Brown v. H. R. G. Yates (recently decided by this court), ante, p. 231, 103 Pac. 667 , the appeal in this case is dismissed, and for the same reason. Dunn, Hayes, and Williams, JJ., concur; Kane, C.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Vasek v. Board of County Commissioners

    186 P.3d 928 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 15, 2008

    Brown v. Nicholson, 1997 OK 32, ¶ 5 , 935 P.2d 319, 321 . … See McCrady v. Okla. Dept. of Pub.

    Cited 58 timesPublished
  • Thompson v. Board of Com'rs

    201 Okla. 405 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 26, 1949

    In Western Paint & Chemical Co. v. … Under this law a board of county commissioners could only act to bind the county while they were sitting as a board”. This statement was taken from Butler v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Daxon v. State Election Board

    582 P.2d 1315 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 7, 1978

    In Gragg v. … Daxon’s proffered candidacy, the Board relied upon the case of Findley v. State Election Board, Okl., 325 P.2d 1037, 1038 (1958).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Board of County Commissioners v. State Board of Equalization

    363 P.2d 266 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 27, 1961

    I concur specially for the reasons set forth in Case No. 39,321, Board of County Commissioners of Canadian County, Oklahoma v. State Board of Equalization, Okl., 363 P.2d 242 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Board of Education v. State Board of Education

    293 P.2d 583 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 14, 1956

    Boards of Education of Independent School Districts No. 1-2 and No. 1-3 of Marshall County v. … J., WILLIAMS, V. C. J., and WELCH, CORN, DAVISON, HALLEY and HUNT, JJ., concur.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Board of Review v. Codding

    199 Okla. 281 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 21, 1947

    In Anderson v. … In Conner, Sheriff, v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • EDWARDS v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

    378 P.3d 54 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 22, 2015

    Dowell, 2013 OK 50, ¶5 , 304 P.3d 457 ; Brown ex rel. Brown v. Oklahoma Secondary School Activities Ass'n, 2005 OK 88, ¶11 , 125 P.3d 1219 . Accordingly, this Court will consider all ewdence on appeal, Dowell *59 v. … Pletcher, 2013 OK 50, ¶ 5 , 304 P.3d 457 ; Brown ex rel. Brown, 2005 OK 88, ¶ 11 , 125 P.3d 1219 .

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Board of County Commissioners v. State Board of Equalization

    363 P.2d 506 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 5, 1961

    State Board, etc., Okl., 363 P.2d 263 ; Board of County Com’rs v. State Board, Okl., 363 P.2d 250 ; Sasseen v. … State Board, etc., Okl., 363 P.2d 252 ; In re Carter County, *508 Okl., 363 P.2d 254 ; Board of County Com’rs v. State Board, Okl., 363 P.2d 256 ; Board of County Com’rs v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Education v. Montgomery

    177 Okla. 423 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 8, 1936

    Plaintiff appears to proceed solely upon the theory that Doud employed him, acting as agent of the school board, and that the school board subsequently ratified an agreement had with Doud. … Carlisle v. National Oil & Dev. Co., 108 Okla. 18 , 234 P. 629 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Watson v. State Election Board

    302 P.2d 134 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 16, 1956

    In Blanset v. … WILLIAMS, V. C. J., and WELCH and BLACKBIRD, JJ., dissent.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Missouri State Life Ins. Co. v. Brown

    150 Okla. 143 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 28, 1931

    Brown and Joseph E. Drake, a drilling contractor. The business is described in plaintiff’s petition as a joint adventure. H. J. Brown was president of a bank at Walters. An account was carried by Drake in said hank. … Plaintiff Brown, from time to time, honored drafts drawn by Drake and by I-I, j; Brown, which went to Drake’s account in said bank.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • First Nat. Bank of Temple v. Brown

    62 Okla. 112 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 2, 1917

    Brown et al. v. First Nat. Bank of Temple, 85 Okla. 726 , 180 Pac. 140 . The cause was then tried in Cotton county, and defendants recovered judgment for costs. … Co. v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Brickell v. State Election Board

    203 Okla. 361 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 4, 1950

    His application was denied by the Board. Thereupon he filed this action in this court seeking mandamus. Said application under the rules of law this day announced in William O. Coe v. … State Election Board et al., 203 Okla. 356 , 221 P. 2d 774 , and for the reasons therein stated, was and is wholly sufficient to entitle said petitioner to a recount as prayed for. Writ granted.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Brown

    32 Okla. 483 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 9, 1912

    Co. v. Shepherd, 20 Okla. 626 , 95 Pac. 243 , St. Louis, etc., R. Co. v. Huff, 26 Okla. 251 , 109 Pac. 232 , Ft. Smith, etc., Ry. Co. v. Benson, 26 Okla 246, 109 Pac. 77 , Ft. Smith, etc., Ry. Co. v. … Co. v. Loftis, 25 Okla. 496 , 106 Pac. 824 , and Missouri, etc., R. Co. v.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Board of County Commissioners v. Seawell

    3 Okla. 281 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 7, 1895

    This principle is concisely stated in Wapello County v. Sinnaman, 1 G. … To the same effect are the following decisions: Fulton v. Monona County, 47 Ia. 621 ; Brick v. Plymouth County, 63 Ia. 463 , 19 N. W. 304 ; Bradley v. Delaware County, 57 Ia. 552 , 10 N. W. 898 ; United States v.

    Cited 21 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.