Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
2,305 results
1.23s
Schulte Oil Co. v. Oklahoma Tax Commission
65 O.B.A.J. 3046 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 20, 1994
, which clearly defined the contested exemption’s outer perimeter. … RDL has clearly met the law’s burden for establishing its status qua manufacturer.
Cited 32 timesPublishedConsolidated School Dist. No. 8 v. Wilder
148 Okla. 91 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 31, 1931
We agree with counsel for defendant and intervener that the rule of law announced in their brief in support of their motion is a well-established rule of this court. … Under the holdings of this court, where the trial court exercised a judicial discretion, this court will not reverse the judgment of the trial court unless the trial court clearly abused its discretion. Trimmer v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedMEEKS v. GUARANTEE INSURANCE COMPANY
2017 OK 17 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 28, 2017
"To implement this bargain, the Legislature established the workers' compensation system as the exclusive remedy for employees who suffer accidental on the job injuries. … To hold that a workers' compensation insurer's immunity from tort liability is not coterminous with that of an insured employer's own immunity would indeed abrogate the latter's protection by removing the bargain's very pedestal
Cited 0 timesPublished188 P.3d 128 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 24, 2008
On 21 November 2005 the Chic-kasha City Council passed Ordinance No.2005-17 which established a tax increment financing district (TIF).Within the city the TIF was established under the provisions of the Local Development … The November 2005 election fails to qualify as a general election.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCourt Fund of Tulsa County v. Cook
557 P.2d 875 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 7, 1976
The Board’s deter- *878 initiation is entitled to the same presumption of correctnéss as a judgment and is similarly immune from collateral attack. … Clearly, mandamus lies to compel the performance of a ministerial duty. 12 O.S.1971, § 1451; Ballard v. Christian, Okl., 451 P.2d 943 (1969).
Cited 11 timesPublished68 O.B.A.J. 3102 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 30, 1997
Section 414 clearly shows the legislature’s intent to enforce the provisions of the Occupational Safety & Health Standards Act only against the public employer, except in the most extreme circumstances when the private workplace … Dep’t of Transp., 1980 OK 145 , 618 P.2d 397, 398 (This Court said that any changes in the public policy of governmental immunity would need to come from the legislature and not the Court.); State ex rel.
Cited 28 timesPublished476 P.2d 317 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 3, 1970
Action upon a rejected claim to establish money demand against the estate must be brought in the county of probate. … Application of the rule is qualified by the prerequisite — an action rightly brought. This statute was involved in earlier decisions of McClung v. Cullison, 15 Okl. 402 , 82 P. 499 ; Brocker, Admr. v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedOklahoma Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co.
70 O.B.A.J. 1366 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 27, 1999
The exact line of demarcation between franchises and licenses may not be clearly drawn, but their general characters and limits are so well known and so clearly established that it is not difficult to assign many rights granted … A process should be established whereby all retail consumers are permitted to choose their retail electric energy suppliers by July 1, 2002. Id. at § 190.4.
Cited 18 timesPublished123 Okla. 81 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 21, 1926
Gottman was established. … . *84 For the reasons herein stated, the order and decree of the trial court are clearly against the weight of the evidence and contrary to law.
Cited 4 timesPublishedAtchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Miles
69 Okla. 138 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 5, 1918
If a party was limited to expert testimony, where it is necessary for him to prove the speed of an automobile or train in order to establish negligence, it would be very rare instances where he would be able to establish … Therefore the rule that nonexpert witnesses may testify concerning the speed of an automobile and train seems to be clearly founded on sound principle and justice.
Cited 11 timesPublishedGardner v. School Dist. No. 87, Kay County
34 Okla. 716 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 20, 1912
In Endlich on the Interpretation of Statutes, sec. 216, it is said: “Hence, if there are two acts, or two provisions in the'same act, of which one is special and particular, and clearly includes the matter in controversy, … The considerations already stated are sufficient to establish beyond a reasonable doubt, that the special act was not intended to be repealed by the taking' effect of the Revised Statutes.”
Cited 31 timesPublished39 Okla. 105 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 6, 1913
(Defendant objects, as the witness has not shown himself qualified to testify..) *Q. Does that purport to be a certified copy. (Defendant objects.) A. It does not purport to be a certified copy. Q. … But the court held that the testimony clearly did not come within his privilege, and said that: “The only thing he was forbidden to disclose was the confidential communication.
Cited 17 timesPublishedEdge v. Board of County Commissioners
318 P.2d 621 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 19, 1957
There the petition for change of boundary of a district must have been signed by at least one-third of the qualified electors of the school district. … It appears to be the established rule that such numerical sufficiency of the petition is an essential prerequisite to the power to make the suggested change in the boundaries of the district.
Cited 5 timesPublished11 Okla. 291 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 5, 1901
We think that this contention is clearly untenable. … These decisions were clearly incompetent, and the court,' therefore, properly sustained the plaintiff’s objections thereto.
Cited 11 timesPublishedDolese Bros. Co. v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Tax Commission
74 O.B.A.J. 420 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 21, 2003
Taxpayers physically reproduce this rubber-stamped certification in their brief, but their argument is clearly ivithout record support. … used by persons in the operation of manufacturing plants already established in Oklahoma.
Cited 24 timesPublished2023 OK 26 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 28, 2023
"The right to injunctive relief must be established by clear and convincing evidence and the nature of the injury must not be nominal, theoretical, or speculative." … Rather, District asserts what determines whether a student should be temporarily quarantined is evidence of that student's heightened immunity to COVID-19.
Cited 0 timesPublished325 P.2d 72 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 29, 1958
Therein, the petitioner refused to answer questions tending to establish the guilt of another. … To be valid the statute must afford absolute immunity against future prosecution for the offense to which the question relates.” [ 2 Okl.Cr. 110 , 100 P. 40 .]
Cited 2 timesPublished186 Okla. 264 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 21, 1939
The establishment, in 1897, of a state board of bar examiners, in place of the county boards previously existing, is an example. … In the light of the authorities to which we have referred, which clearly represent the overwhelming weight of authority, the above-quoted legislative act cannot stand.
Cited 9 timesPublished113 Okla. 1 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 31, 1925
the defendant in error, and it is a well-settled rule of law of this state that where there is conflicting evidence on any fact, the finding of fact of the lower court must be considered the finding of fact in this court, qualified … Hence the converse is true; if not clearly against the weight of the evidence, the judgment should be sustained.
Cited 1 timesPublishedKelley v. Garfield County Bldg. & Loan Ass'n
180 Okla. 253 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 15, 1936
and is for a special purpose; that purpose was to supply a special form of loan, presumptively, at least, to assist the citizen of small means to acquire a home and pay for it by small monthly installments, when he could qualify … This rule and these holdings appear to be the general and established rule regardless of, rather without the aid of, any statutory provision.
Cited 7 timesPublished
Ask Donna