Case law

State Ex Rel. Brown v. Dunnaway

207 Okla. 144 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 16, 1952

Brown was not discharged by the old library board. … Lowden v. Washita County Excise Board, 186 Okla. 708 , 100 P. 2d 459 . In another enactment, 11 O.

Cross Ex Rel. Cross v. Brown

363 P.2d 935 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 20, 1961

Brown he sustained an accidental injury arising out of and in the course of his employment on January 31, 1960. … Brown, and Sinclair Refining Company to review the order denying the award.

Sterling Milk Products Co. v. Brown

146 Okla. 302 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 16, 1930

With this contention we cannot agree, for, as is said in the first paragraph of j:he syllabus of Simpson v. … The defendant tendered proof that there was no liability on its part by reason of the damages claimed to have been suffered by Cecil Brown, plaintiff in the action, and further, that Cecil Brown suffered no damage upon which

MIDLAND CO-OP. WHOLESALE v. Brown

207 Okla. 441 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 14, 1952

Brown, hereinafter called claimant, filed his first notice of injury and claim for compensation stating that while employed by Midland Co-Operative Wholesale, hereinafter called employer, he sustained an accidental injury … Co. v.

Chickasha Cotton Oil Co. v. Brown

39 Okla. 245 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 20, 1913

Brown against the Chickasha Cotton Oil Company to recover damages for injuries sustained by the plaintiff while attempting to apply some dressing to a belt in one of the defendant’s gins. *246 The defendant assigns as error … See Humphrey v. Morgan, 30 Okla. 343 , 120 Pac. 577 ; Dunlap v. Flowers, 21 Okla. 600 , 96 Pac. 643 ; Bales v. N. W. Consol. Milling Co., 21 Okla. 421 , 96 Pac. 599 .

Brown v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co.

108 Okla. 90 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 3, 1925

Lee v. Little, 81 Okla. 168 , 197 Pac. 449 . … Justice Williams, Farmers’ National Bank of Tecumseh v. McCall. 25 Okla. 600 , 106 Pac. 866 , which ruling was followed in the cases of Taylor v. Wooden, 30 Okla. 6 , 118 Pac. 372 ; Midland Valley Ry. Co. v.

Riley v. Brown and Root, Inc.

836 P.2d 1298 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 24, 1992

Paul Fire and Marine Ins. v. … See, e.g., Shibuya v. Architects Hawaii Limited, 65 Haw. 26 , 647 P.2d 276 (1982); Terry v. New Mexico State Highway Comm’n, 98 N.M. 119 , 645 P.2d 1375 (1982); Freezer Storage Inc. v.

Fent v. Contingency Review Board

163 P.3d 512 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 1, 2007

See Springer v. … Oklahoma County Board of Equalization, 1983 OK 59 , 678 P.2d 233, 239-240 (Supplemental Opinion on Rehearing); Oklahoma Education Ass'n., Inc. v. Nigh, 1982 OK 22 , 642 P.2d 230, 239 . 62 .

Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Brown

190 Okla. 338 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 16, 1941

White v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. (Mo. App.) 107 S.W. 2d 957 , 961; State v. Allen, 339 Mo. 1156 , 100 S.W. 2d 487 ; Travelers Ins. Co. v. Pittman, 51 Ga. App. 401 , 180 S.E. 650 . … Kane v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 228 Mo. App. 649 , 73 S.W. 2d 826 ; Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Wann, 130 Tex. 400 , 109 S.W. 2d 470 , 115 A.L.R. 1301 ; Oswald v. Equitable Life Assur.

Snyder Co-Op. Ass'n v. Brown

70 Okla. 13 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 30, 1918

There was a trial to the court and a jury, and a verdict returned against, the Snyder Co-operative Association and in favor of Brown and Poteet in the sum of $300. and judgment rendered thereon, to review which this appeal … Lynch et al. v. Halsell, 34 Okla. 307 , 125 Pac. 725 . An examination of the record discloses an abundance of testimony tending to support the finding of the jury.

Oklahoma Portland Cement Co. v. Brown

45 Okla. 476 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 22, 1914

Brown, defendant in error, in the district court of Pontotoc county, sued the Oklahoma Portland Cement Company, plaintiff in error, in damages for personal injuries. … Co. v.

Board of County Commissioners v. State Board of Equalization

363 P.2d 256 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 13, 1961

Plaintiff in error appeals from the same order of the State Board of Equalization that was appealed from in other cases, including Cause No. 39321. Okl., 363 P.2d 242 . … J., BLACKBIRD, V. C. J., and WELCH, DAVISON, HALLEY, JOHNSON and BERRY, JJ., concur. IRWIN, J., concurs specially. JACKSON, J., dissents.

John A. Brown Co. v. Clause

205 Okla. 122 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 12, 1951

Citing, Mountcastle v. Miller, 66 Okla. 40 , 166 P. 1057 ; Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Ward, 200 Okla. 315 , 193 P. 2d 569 ; City of Tulsa v. … S., Appeal and Error, §1626; Jordan Bus Co. v. Garnand, 203 Okla. 623 , 225 P. 2d 173 ; Bucktrot v. Partridge, 130 Okla. 122 , 265 P. 768 .

Board of County Commissioners v. State Board of Equalization

363 P.2d 250 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 13, 1961

Here, plaintiff in error appeals from the same order of the State Board of Equalization appealed from in other cases this day decided, including Cause No. 39323, Board of County Com’rs of Greer County v. … Here, as in the cited case, plaintiff in error contends under its first proposition for reversal, that the State Board had no authority, in view of what this court said in Custer County, Excise Board v. St. Louis-S. F.

Board of County Commissioners v. State Board of Equalization

363 P.2d 937 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 5, 1961

The majority opinion holds the five transactions “probably should have been excluded by the Tax Commission from its ratio study,” and that “it is entirely possible that the Board did not consider same and only considered … In no instance did the State Board of Equalization order that rural or urban property which had an average valuation in excess of 22.07 per cent, be increased; and, in no instance did the Board order that any rural or urban

Monsell v. Excise Board

142 Okla. 130 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 14, 1930

El Reno Wholesale Grocery Co. v. Taylor, 87 Okla. 140 , 209 Pac. 749 ; Hines v. Dalton, 90 Okla. 239 , 217 Pac. 168 . … Albrecht v. Jones, supra.

Board of County Commissioners v. State Board of Equalization

363 P.2d 259 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 13, 1961

Plaintiff in error has lodged the present appeal from the same order of the State Board of Equalization appealed from in other cases this day decided, including cause No. 39321, Board of County Com’rs of Canadian County v … Thrasher v. Board of Governors, Okl., 359 P.2d 717 . All other arguments of plaintiff in error have been rejected as grounds for the order’s reversal in Cause No. 39321, supra.

John A. Brown Co. v. Thompson

187 Okla. 255 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 7, 1940

Brown Company, and will be disposed of first. … See Proctor v. Sisler, 182 Okla. 603 , 78 P. 2d 802 ; Ward v. Archer, 173 Okla. 465 , 52 P. 2d 758 .

State ex rel. Trimble v. Brown

488 P.2d 1217 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 21, 1971

Nesbitt, Attorney General v. … As this court held in Lattimore, County Attorney v.

Glasco v. State Election Board

121 Okla. 119 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 9, 1926

Betts v. Land Commissioners, 27 Okla. 64 , 110 P. 766 ; Higgins v. Brown, 20 Okla. 355 , 94 P. 703 ; Territory v. Long-Bell Lumber Co., 22 Okla. 890 , 99 P. 911 ; City Council v. … Board of Commissioners, 33 Colo. 1 , 77 P. 858 . Also citing Coyle v. Smith, 28 Okla. 121 , 113 P. 944 , in the eighth paragraph of the syllabus of which this court, speaking through Mr.