Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersokla

10,000+ results

3.10s

  • Jordan v. Brown Shoe Co.

    152 Okla. 288 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 20, 1931

    Co. v. … Sale v. French, 61 Miss. 170 -175; Yarnell v. Brown, 170 Ill. 362 , 48 N. E. 909 , 62 Am. St. Rep. 380 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Freeling v. Brown

    92 Okla. 137 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 18, 1923

    It should be added that Rena Brown, wife of the defendant J. R. Brown, at the request of A. J. Welch, attorney for said J. R. Brown, was added as one of the movants without objection on the part of the state. … Street, 9 Okla. 422 , 60 Pac. 221 ; Powell v. Bank, 56 Okla. 44 , 155 Pac. 500 ; Bank v. Lowenstein, 52 Okla. 259 , 165 Pac. 1127 .

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Brown Bridgeman v. Western Casket Co.

    30 Okla. 144 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 14, 1911

    Kuhlman v. Williams, 1 Okla. 136 , 28 Pac. 867 ; De Berry v. Smith, 2 Okla. 1 , 35 Pac. 578 ; Carson v. Butt, 4 Okla. 133 , 46 Pac. 596 ; Hardwick v. Atkinson, 8 Okla. 608 , 58 Pac. 747 ; Beperstein v. … Territory, 8 Okla. 467 , 58 Pac. 641 ; Boyd v. Bryan, 11 Okla. 56 , 65 Pac. 940 ; Osborne & Co. v. Case, 11 Okla. 479 , 69 Pac. 263 ; Menten v. Shuttee, 11 Okla. 381 , 67 Pac. 478 ; S. W. Cottonseed Oil Co. v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Vose v. Banking Board

    483 P.2d 731 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 9, 1971

    which is defined in Yellow Transit Co. v. … Accord, Universal Camera Corp. v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Brown v. United Services Automobile Ass'n

    684 P.2d 1195 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 24, 1984

    The Plaintiff, Barbara Brown, was a passenger in a vehicle insured by the policy of insurance, which vehicle was being driven by the wife of the named insured. While the vehicle was being driven by Ms. … Brown, another vehicle collided with the Beal vehicle, causing injury to Ms. Brown. The other vehicle left the scene of the accident without stopping.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Excise Board v. Reid

    143 Okla. 204 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 6, 1930

    Perrine v. Bonaparte, 140 Okla. 165 , 282 Pac. 332 , and under that holding the action of the excise board was without authority of law and was a wrongful usurpation of power. … X, LESTER, V. C. X, and RILEY, X, absent. Note. — See “Municipal Corporations,” 44 C.J. §4115, p. 1160, n. 39; §4116, p. 1160, n. 48; §4120, p. 1164, n. 33; §4369, p. 1312, n. 88.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Prairie Oil & Gas Co. v. Brown

    150 Okla. 299 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 30, 1931

    Brown, while he was at the house of Mr. Earbro. At page 85, the counsel puts to Mr. Earbro the question : “Q. Isn’t it a fact, Mr. … State Industrial Commission, 101 Okla. 283 , 225 Pac. 720 , and the decision of this court in Hogan v. State Industrial Commission, 86 Okla. 161 , 207 Pac. 303 , and Associated Employers’ Reciprocal v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • John A. Brown Company v. Shelton

    391 P.2d 259 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 7, 1964

    Brown Company, Inc., retailer of the product. … It is Bel v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Exchange Trust Co.

    169 Okla. 175 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 9, 1934

    Cushing Gas Co. v. Hutchins, 93 Okla. 13 . 219 P. 408 . … Graves v. Graves, 132 Iowa, 199 . 109 N. W. 707 , 10 L. R. A. (N. S.) 210. The discussions of this court in the opinion in El Reno Mutual Fire Ins. Co. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Smith v. Graham Brown Shoe Co.

    179 Okla. 559 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 6, 1937

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Brown

    170 Okla. 67 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 2, 1934

    In Tanner v. … H. 217; Cosselmen v. Dunfee, 172 N. Y. 507 , 65 N. B. 494; Manigold v. Black River T. Co., 80 N. Y. Supp. 861 ; Eckhart & Swan M. Co. v. Schaefer, 101 Ill. App. 500 ; Herrin v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Lynde-Bowman-Darby Co. v. Brown

    22 Okla. 216 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 12, 1908

    In the case of De Graffenreid v. … Apptying the principles laid down in the cases of George v. Bobb et al. and De Graffenreid v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Panther Oil & Gas Co. v. Brown

    170 Okla. 210 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 4, 1934

    In Harrah State Bank v. … Johnson et al. v. United Rys. Co. et al., 247 Mo. 326 , 152 S. W. 362 ; Pye v. Eagle Lake Lumber Co. (Cal.) 227 P. 193 . In White v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Harris Meat & Produce Co. v. Brown

    177 Okla. 317 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 30, 1936

    Brown. … Co. v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Magnolia Pipe Line Co. v. Brown

    195 Okla. 345 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 13, 1945

    In the case of Muskogee Electric Traction Co. v. … Ry. v. DeVore, 43 Okla. 534 , 143 P. 864 ; Oklahoma Union Ry. Co. v. Bartrand, 129 Okla. 263 , 264 P. 621 ; 46 A.L.R. 1230 .

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Sterling Milk Products Co. v. Brown

    173 Okla. 452 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 10, 1935

    (Sterling Milk Products Company v. Brown, 146 Okla. 302 , 294 P. 117 .) … This court, in Orwig et al. v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Ferguson v. Stephenson-Brown Lumber Co.

    14 Okla. 148 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 8, 1904

    In the case of Blanchard v. Schwartz, 7 Okla. 23 , this court says: “Mechanics Lien. Statement of Sufficiency. … Now in this case we find on page 11, the following statement: “Stephenson Brown Lbr.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Harness v. McKee-brown Lumber Co.

    17 Okla. 624 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 13, 1907

    .: This action was brought by' the McKee-Brown Lumber Company in the district court of Oklahoma county against I). E. … with Gillespie & Son,' contractors and builders, to erect a dwelling house for him at. the price and sum of $2,562.00; that said Gillespie & Son were to furnish all the material and construct said house; that the McKee-Brown

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Brown

    180 Okla. 489 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 30, 1937

    BAYLESS, V. C. J. Maud L. Brown, formerly Garletts, claiming to be the bene-fici'ary named in a benefit certificate issued to her son, Fred O. … Clarke v. Lockstone, 170 Okla. 316 , 39 P. (2d) 971 ; Cromwell v. Ream, supra, and Gungoll v. Elsberry, 177 Okla. 301 . 58 P. (2d) 852 , and other cases.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Chickasha Cotton Oil Co. v. Brown

    39 Okla. 245 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 20, 1913

    Brown against the Chickasha Cotton Oil Company to recover damages for injuries sustained by the plaintiff while attempting to apply some dressing to a belt in one of the defendant’s gins. *246 The defendant assigns as error … See Humphrey v. Morgan, 30 Okla. 343 , 120 Pac. 577 ; Dunlap v. Flowers, 21 Okla. 600 , 96 Pac. 643 ; Bales v. N. W. Consol. Milling Co., 21 Okla. 421 , 96 Pac. 599 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.