Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
3.10s
152 Okla. 288 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 20, 1931
Co. v. … Sale v. French, 61 Miss. 170 -175; Yarnell v. Brown, 170 Ill. 362 , 48 N. E. 909 , 62 Am. St. Rep. 380 .
Cited 1 timesPublishedState Ex Rel. Freeling v. Brown
92 Okla. 137 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 18, 1923
It should be added that Rena Brown, wife of the defendant J. R. Brown, at the request of A. J. Welch, attorney for said J. R. Brown, was added as one of the movants without objection on the part of the state. … Street, 9 Okla. 422 , 60 Pac. 221 ; Powell v. Bank, 56 Okla. 44 , 155 Pac. 500 ; Bank v. Lowenstein, 52 Okla. 259 , 165 Pac. 1127 .
Cited 9 timesPublishedBrown Bridgeman v. Western Casket Co.
30 Okla. 144 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 14, 1911
Kuhlman v. Williams, 1 Okla. 136 , 28 Pac. 867 ; De Berry v. Smith, 2 Okla. 1 , 35 Pac. 578 ; Carson v. Butt, 4 Okla. 133 , 46 Pac. 596 ; Hardwick v. Atkinson, 8 Okla. 608 , 58 Pac. 747 ; Beperstein v. … Territory, 8 Okla. 467 , 58 Pac. 641 ; Boyd v. Bryan, 11 Okla. 56 , 65 Pac. 940 ; Osborne & Co. v. Case, 11 Okla. 479 , 69 Pac. 263 ; Menten v. Shuttee, 11 Okla. 381 , 67 Pac. 478 ; S. W. Cottonseed Oil Co. v.
Cited 10 timesPublished483 P.2d 731 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 9, 1971
which is defined in Yellow Transit Co. v. … Accord, Universal Camera Corp. v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedBrown v. United Services Automobile Ass'n
684 P.2d 1195 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 24, 1984
The Plaintiff, Barbara Brown, was a passenger in a vehicle insured by the policy of insurance, which vehicle was being driven by the wife of the named insured. While the vehicle was being driven by Ms. … Brown, another vehicle collided with the Beal vehicle, causing injury to Ms. Brown. The other vehicle left the scene of the accident without stopping.
Cited 17 timesPublished143 Okla. 204 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 6, 1930
Perrine v. Bonaparte, 140 Okla. 165 , 282 Pac. 332 , and under that holding the action of the excise board was without authority of law and was a wrongful usurpation of power. … X, LESTER, V. C. X, and RILEY, X, absent. Note. — See “Municipal Corporations,” 44 C.J. §4115, p. 1160, n. 39; §4116, p. 1160, n. 48; §4120, p. 1164, n. 33; §4369, p. 1312, n. 88.
Cited 4 timesPublishedPrairie Oil & Gas Co. v. Brown
150 Okla. 299 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 30, 1931
Brown, while he was at the house of Mr. Earbro. At page 85, the counsel puts to Mr. Earbro the question : “Q. Isn’t it a fact, Mr. … State Industrial Commission, 101 Okla. 283 , 225 Pac. 720 , and the decision of this court in Hogan v. State Industrial Commission, 86 Okla. 161 , 207 Pac. 303 , and Associated Employers’ Reciprocal v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedJohn A. Brown Company v. Shelton
391 P.2d 259 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 7, 1964
Brown Company, Inc., retailer of the product. … It is Bel v.
Cited 6 timesPublished169 Okla. 175 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 9, 1934
Cushing Gas Co. v. Hutchins, 93 Okla. 13 . 219 P. 408 . … Graves v. Graves, 132 Iowa, 199 . 109 N. W. 707 , 10 L. R. A. (N. S.) 210. The discussions of this court in the opinion in El Reno Mutual Fire Ins. Co. v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedSmith v. Graham Brown Shoe Co.
179 Okla. 559 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 6, 1937
Cited 5 timesPublishedBrotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Brown
170 Okla. 67 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 2, 1934
In Tanner v. … H. 217; Cosselmen v. Dunfee, 172 N. Y. 507 , 65 N. B. 494; Manigold v. Black River T. Co., 80 N. Y. Supp. 861 ; Eckhart & Swan M. Co. v. Schaefer, 101 Ill. App. 500 ; Herrin v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedLynde-Bowman-Darby Co. v. Brown
22 Okla. 216 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 12, 1908
In the case of De Graffenreid v. … Apptying the principles laid down in the cases of George v. Bobb et al. and De Graffenreid v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedPanther Oil & Gas Co. v. Brown
170 Okla. 210 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 4, 1934
In Harrah State Bank v. … Johnson et al. v. United Rys. Co. et al., 247 Mo. 326 , 152 S. W. 362 ; Pye v. Eagle Lake Lumber Co. (Cal.) 227 P. 193 . In White v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedHarris Meat & Produce Co. v. Brown
177 Okla. 317 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 30, 1936
Brown. … Co. v.
Cited 10 timesPublishedMagnolia Pipe Line Co. v. Brown
195 Okla. 345 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 13, 1945
In the case of Muskogee Electric Traction Co. v. … Ry. v. DeVore, 43 Okla. 534 , 143 P. 864 ; Oklahoma Union Ry. Co. v. Bartrand, 129 Okla. 263 , 264 P. 621 ; 46 A.L.R. 1230 .
Cited 6 timesPublishedSterling Milk Products Co. v. Brown
173 Okla. 452 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 10, 1935
(Sterling Milk Products Company v. Brown, 146 Okla. 302 , 294 P. 117 .) … This court, in Orwig et al. v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedFerguson v. Stephenson-Brown Lumber Co.
14 Okla. 148 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 8, 1904
In the case of Blanchard v. Schwartz, 7 Okla. 23 , this court says: “Mechanics Lien. Statement of Sufficiency. … Now in this case we find on page 11, the following statement: “Stephenson Brown Lbr.
Cited 4 timesPublishedHarness v. McKee-brown Lumber Co.
17 Okla. 624 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 13, 1907
.: This action was brought by' the McKee-Brown Lumber Company in the district court of Oklahoma county against I). E. … with Gillespie & Son,' contractors and builders, to erect a dwelling house for him at. the price and sum of $2,562.00; that said Gillespie & Son were to furnish all the material and construct said house; that the McKee-Brown
Cited 7 timesPublishedBrotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Brown
180 Okla. 489 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 30, 1937
BAYLESS, V. C. J. Maud L. Brown, formerly Garletts, claiming to be the bene-fici'ary named in a benefit certificate issued to her son, Fred O. … Clarke v. Lockstone, 170 Okla. 316 , 39 P. (2d) 971 ; Cromwell v. Ream, supra, and Gungoll v. Elsberry, 177 Okla. 301 . 58 P. (2d) 852 , and other cases.
Cited 6 timesPublishedChickasha Cotton Oil Co. v. Brown
39 Okla. 245 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 20, 1913
Brown against the Chickasha Cotton Oil Company to recover damages for injuries sustained by the plaintiff while attempting to apply some dressing to a belt in one of the defendant’s gins. *246 The defendant assigns as error … See Humphrey v. Morgan, 30 Okla. 343 , 120 Pac. 577 ; Dunlap v. Flowers, 21 Okla. 600 , 96 Pac. 643 ; Bales v. N. W. Consol. Milling Co., 21 Okla. 421 , 96 Pac. 599 .
Cited 5 timesPublished
Ask Donna