Case law

BROWN v. CLAIMS MANAGEMENT RESOURCES INC.

391 P.3d 111 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 22, 2017

Dept. of Public Safety v. … TWA v.

Board of County Commissioners v. State Board of Equalization

363 P.2d 242 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 13, 1961

v. … Kurn, 189 Okl. 203 , 115 P.2d 113, 115 , and Williams v.

Board of Education v. Board of Logan County

155 Okla. 214 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 16, 1932

This is an original action in mandamus brought in this court by the board of education oi^ school district No. 60, Logan county, against the county excise board of that county, and others, seeking to compel the excise board … Board of Education, School Dist. No. 16, v. Excise Board Payne Co., No. 23153, decided Jan. 26, 1932, 155 Okla. 227 , 7 P. (2d) 473 .

City of Duncan v. Brown

69 Okla. 246 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 9, 1918

Lynn v. Jacksoon, 26 Okla. 852 , 110 Pac. 727 ; Jantzen v. Emanuel German Baptist Church, 27 Okla. 473 , 112 Pac. 1127 , Ann. Cas. 1912C, 659; Reynolds v. Hill, 28 Okla. 533 , 114 Pac. 1108 ; Seaver v. … In the City of Woodward v.

Brown v. Triangle Motor Co.

187 Okla. 11 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 26, 1940

The authorities cited in the brief reasonably sustain the allegations of error, and as stated in Osborne v. … J., WELCH, V. C. J., and RILEY, OSBORN, CORN, GIBSON, HURST, DAVISON, and DANNER, JJ., concur.

Kelly Et Ux. v. Brown

55 Okla. 628 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 15, 1916

Brown. Third, that defendants did borrow and receive from Charles Bryan about the sum of $260, and that ■ Charles Bryan, without the knowledge or consent of defendants, made the note and mortgage payable to E. M. … Co. v. Calhoun, 18 Okla. 75 , 89 Pac. 207 , 11 Ann. Cas. 681 this court says: “A verdict will not be reviewed as to the facts on appeal, if there is sufficient evidence to support it.”

Nettograph MacH. Co. v. Brown

28 Okla. 436 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 21, 1911

On March 6, 1904, the Nettograph Machine Company, plaintiff in error, sued Jennie Brown and A. J. … Wilt, 86 Ind. 367 ; Brown v. Weldon, 27 Mo. App. 251 . There is a total absence of consideration for either of the notes.” Smith v. Hightower, supra, was a suit on a promissory note.

Brown v. International Land Co.

29 Okla. 341 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 11, 1911

Hall, the original lessee, paid the rental for the year 1906, and Brown, the plaintiff, for the year 1907. No further rentals were ever paid. … Some time before the 1st day of January, 190S, the subtenant of Brown, the plaintiff, whose sublease expired with the rental season of 1907, moved off the place, and the premises were entirely vacant and unoccupied, although

BROWN v. CLAIMS MANAGEMENT RESOURCES INC.

2017 OK 13 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 22, 2017

TWA v. … FENT v. STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA WATER RESOURCES BOARD Discussed 2006 OK 31, 136 P.3d 639, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF MUSKOGEE COUNTY v. LOWERY Discussed 2006 OK 58, 152 P.3d 165, GILBERT v.

Joe Brown Co. v. Melton

307 P.3d 342 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 2, 2013

T1 The claimant, Adrian Melton, was a truck driver for the employer, Joe Brown Company, Inc. … See Parks v. Norman Municipal Hospital, 1984 OK 53, ¶ 13 , 684 P.2d 548, 552 .

Brown-Beane Co. v. Rucker

36 Okla. 698 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 21, 1913

Eakin, 23 Okla. 321 , 100 Pac. 528 ; following Herren v. Merrilees, 7 Okla. 261 , 54 Pac. 467 ; Herring et al. v. Wiggins, 7 Okla. 312 , 54 Pac. 483 . … Craig v. Greer, Sheriff, 33 Okla. 302 , 124 Pac. 1096 ; Green et al. v. In *700 corporated Town of Yeager, 23 Okla. 128 , 99 Pac. 906 ; Lamb et al. v. Young et al., 24 Okla. 614, 104 Pac. 335 ; Nelson et al. v.

Davonian Oil Co. v. Brown

128 Okla. 149 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 4, 1927

This court in the case of Ctiy National Bank v. … Co. v. Weaver, 67 Okla. 293 , 171 Pac. 34 ; Lawton National Bank v. Ulrich et al., 81 Okla. 159 , 197 Pac. 167 .

Bradford v. Brennan and Brown

12 Okla. 333 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 5, 1903

Brown, two hundred: and sixteen dollars, value received, with 10 per cent interest per annum from date until paid, .and in case this note is'placed in. the-hands of an attorney for collection after maturity, I agree to-pay … Brown, two hundred and sixteen dollars, value received, with ten per cent interest per annum from date until pala, •and in case this note is placed in the hands of an attorney for collection after maturity I agree to pay

Brown-Beane Co. v. Rucker

36 Okla. 696 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 18, 1912

Haynes et al. v. Smith, 29 Okla. 703 , 119 Pac. 246 ; Thompson et al. v. Fulton, 29 Okla. 700 , 119 Pac. 244 ; Devault et al. v. Merchants’ Exchange Co., 22 Okla. 624 , 98 Pac. 342 ; Bettis v. … Cargile et al., 23 Okla. 301 , 100 Pac. 436 ; Bray v. Bray, 25 Okla. 71 , 105 Pac. 200 ; Carr v. Thompson et al., 27 Okla. 7 , 110 Pac. 667 ; Cowan v. Maxwell, 27 Okla. 87 , 111 Pac. 388 ; Lankford v.

Tulsa County Budget Board v. Tulsa County Excise Board

74 O.B.A.J. 3318 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 2, 2003

v. … Board of County Comm'rs of Tulsa County, 1988 OK 44, ¶ 13 , 959 P.2d 979 ; Carter v. City of Oklahoma City, 1993 OK 134, ¶ 11 , 862 P.2d 77 .

Excise Board of Oklahoma County v. Board of Educ.

178 Okla. 545 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 20, 1936

Board of Education of the City of Tulsa v. … See, also, Board of Education of Oklahoma County v. Excise Board of Oklahoma County, 175 Okla. 363 , 53 P. (2d) 565 .

Board of County Commissioners v. State Board of Equalization

363 P.2d 263 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 13, 1961

Crawford v. … J., BLACKBIRD, V. C. J., and WELCH, DAVISON, HALLEY, JOHNSON and BERRY, JJ., concur. IRWIN, J., concurs specially. JACKSON, J., dissents.

Brown v. State Nat. Bank

167 Okla. 366 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 20, 1934

died and the cause was revived; that this court reversed the judgment of the trial court (Brown v. … The decision in Turk v.

Conklin Service Station v. Brown

281 P.2d 754 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 29, 1955

Brown. … Co. v. State Industrial Commission, 207 Okl. 428 , 250 P.2d 221 . In determining this question it is therefore unnecessary to enter into a discussion of the evidence other than the medical evidence.

Reeves Realty Co. v. Brown

45 Okla. 737 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 2, 1915

Lundon v. Waddick, 98 Iowa, 478 , 67 N. W. 388 ; Keys v. Warner et al., 45 Cal. 60 . … Kansas Vitrified Brick Co., 70 Nan. 723, 79 Bac. 666; Main Street Bank v. Planters’ Nat. Bank of Richmond, 81 S. E. 24 ; Collier v. White, 67 Miss. 133 , 6 South. 618 ; Townsend v. Swallow et al., 91 Neb. 564 , 136 N.