Case law

Brown v. Sinclair Refining Co.

86 Okla. 143 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 2, 1922

PITCHEORD, V. C. J. … The Court of Appeals of England appears to have taken the same view in the cases of Humber Towing Co., Ltd., v. Barclay, 5 B. W. C. C. 142, and Della Rocca v. Stanley Jones & Co., 6 Neg. C. C.

Board v. Dill

26 Okla. 104 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 19, 1910

One of these, Ball v. … The Court of Appeals of New York, in the case of People ex rel. v. Board of Canvassers, etc., 129 N.

McFadyen and Brown v. Masters

11 Okla. 16 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 6, 1901

The supreme court of Michigan, in Dixon v. … Green, 36 Ind. 10 ; Dugan v. Valtier, 3 Blackf. 245 ; Parkinson v. Hanna, 7 Blackf. 81 ; Minor v. Willoughby, 3 Minn. 239 ; Jewett v. Palmor, 7 John Ch. 67; Mossie v. Enquart, 32 Ark. 251 ; Burnham v.

Board of Ed. v. Board of Com'rs

168 Okla. 548 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 23, 1934

Board of Com’rs, 143 Okla. 1 , 286 P. 902 . A jury was waived and the cause was tried to the court. There was no request for finding of fact. … Hatfield v. Aioreland, 152 Okla. 37 , 3 P. (2d) 803 , and other decision’s of this court pertaining to sinking funds.

Brown & Root, Inc. v. Dunkelberger

196 Okla. 116 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 6, 1945

This is an original proceeding brought by petitioners, Brown and Root, Inc., W. S. … Hecht, 105 Cal. 621 , 38 P. 941 , the court held that the action of a quorum of a duly elected board was the act of the board, where a majority of the quorum voted for the action taken.

Brown v. Capital Townsite Co.

21 Okla. 586 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 25, 1908

Brown, and defendants in error. Therefore said suit was prematurely brought, and the court acquired no jurisdiction.” … Dec. 427 ; Smith v. Taylor, 82 Cal. 533 , 23 Pac. 217 ; Levy et al. v. Chittenden et al., 120 Ind. 37 , 22 N. E. 92 ; Hilgenberq v. Northup et al., 134 Ind. 92 ; 33 N. E. 786 .

Fullwood v. Brown

199 Okla. 324 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 30, 1947

See Bird v. Palmer, 152 Okla. 3 , 3 P. 2d 890 ; Adams v. Carson, 165 Okla. 161 , 25 P. 2d 653 . … The general rule is well exemplified in Renner v. Black, 150 Kan. 834 , 96 P.2d 626 .

Brown v. Burris

172 Okla. 580 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 11, 1935

Hunter v. Battiest, 79 Okla. 248 , 192 P. 575 ; Sutton v. Delancy, 160 Okla. 57 , 15 P. (2d) 815 . … See Lena v. Patterson, 113 Okla. 156 , 242 P. 238 , and cases cited therein.

Brown v. Massey

19 Okla. 482 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 20, 1907

It is the facts set up in the pleadings which make it an answer or cross-petition.” *488 And in Kimball v. … In the case of Venable v. Dutch, 37 Kan. 515 , 15 Pac. 520 , the Kansas supreme court say in the syllabus-: “1.

Mizel v. Brown

204 Okla. 491 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 15, 1951

One of the parties representing plaintiffs asked defendant, Brown, if this particular pipe was for sale. … The conclusion thus reached finds support in Snipes Mountain Co. v. Benz Bros. & Co., 162 Wash. 334 , 298 P. 714 ; Midland Steel & Equipment Co. v. Douglas Auto Parts Co., Inc., 315 Ill. App. 207 , 42 N. E. 2d 550 .

Board of Education v. State Board of Education

197 Okla. 141 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 16, 1946

Board of Commissioners of Creek County v. Alexander, 58 Okla. 128 , 159 P. 311 . … Section 8 of the 1943 act, supra, does not authorize the State Board of Education to consider separate schools as separate school districts in considering the minimum program income provisions of the acts, nor were they so

Oklahoma City v. Brown

148 Okla. 148 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 7, 1931

Brown, defendant in error. … J., Clark:, V. C. .T., and RILEY. HEENER, CTJLLISON, SWINDALL, ANDREWS, and McNEILL, J.I., concur.

Brown v. Hennessey State Bank

78 Okla. 141 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 13, 1920

The exact- question was presented and decided by this court in the case of Board of Equalization of Oklahoma Co. v. … Chief Justice Owen in the case of Board of Equalization v. First State Bank, supra. Counsel further contend that this holding is contrary to the case of Iowa Loan and Trust Co. v.

Brown v. Territory of Oklahoma

15 Okla. 362 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 5, 1905

At the succeeding term of court an indictment was returned against Brown charging him with the crime, of perjury. … It was held in Sproat v.

Sooner Construction Company v. Brown

544 P.2d 500 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 23, 1975

Brown became ill, quit work, and went home and to bed. The next day his wife, claimant herein, took him to the family physician, who recommended hospitalization. … Co. v.

Evans v. Brown Et Ux.

33 Okla. 323 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 23, 1912

Hunter Realty Co. et al. v. Spencer et al., 21 Okla. 155 , 95 Pac. 757 , 17 L. R. A. (N. S.) 622; Ferguson v. Gooch, 94 Va. 1 , 26 S. E. 397 , 40 L. R. A. 234; Conkey v. Bond, 36 N. Y. 427 ; Davis v. … Rep. 541 ; Henderson et al. v. Vin *328 cent, 84 Ala. 99 , 4 South. 180 . In Hunter Realty Co. et al. v.

Colonial Jewelry Co. v. Brown

38 Okla. 44 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 22, 1913

Tovera v. Parker, 34 Okla. 74 , 128 Pac. 101 ; Horton v. Birdsong, 35 Okla. 275 , 129 Pac. 701 . In Lyons v. Stills, 97 Tenn. 514 , 37 S.

Brown Investment Company v. Hickox

369 P.2d 807 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 13, 1962

referring this issue to the trial court as was done in Jones v. … J., BLACKBIRD, V. C. J., and JOHNSON, JACKSON, IRWIN and BERRY, JJ., concur.

Board of Com'rs v. State Board of Equalization

155 Okla. 183 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 23, 1932

CLARK, V. O. J. … In the case of City State Bank of Oklahoma City v.

Galt-Brown Co. v. Lay

183 Okla. 87 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 7, 1938

Lay, damages against the plaintiffs in error, the Galt-Brown Company, a foreign corporation, and Harry J. … Shobe v. Sykes, 169 Okla. 491 , 37 P.2d 908 ; Keener Oil & Gas Co. v. Stewart et al., 172 Okla. 143 , 45 P.2d 121 .