Case law

Brown v. Kemmerer

140 Okla. 140 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 12, 1929

Hereinafter, Barbara Kemmerer will be referred to as plaintiff, and Davis Brown, Betty Brown, and Clay Brown as defendants. … Citizens State Bank, 23 Okla. 723 , 102 Pac. 800 ; Richmond v. Robertson, 50 Okla. 635 , 151 Pac. 203 ; Martin v. Hostetter, 59 Okla. 246 , 158 Pac. 1174 ; Johnson v.

Brown v. Holt

174 Okla. 319 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 9, 1935

The movant cites in support thereof Durant et al. v. Nesbit, 59 Okla. 11 , 157 P. 353 , and related cases. This motion is not contested. A response was ordered on November 13, 1933, but none has been filed.

Hamilton, Sheriff v. Brown

31 Okla. 213 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 9, 1912

Wattenbarger v. Hall, 26 Okla. 815 , 110 Pac. 911 ; Harris v. First Nat. Bank of Bokchito, 21 Okla. 189 , 95 Pac. 781 ; Border et al. v. … Section 115, Freeman on Executions; Burke v. *217 Johnson, 37 Kan. 337, 15 Pac. 204 , 1 Am. St. Rep. 252 ; Roberts v. Robinson, 49 Neb. 717 , 68 N. W. 1035 , 59 Am. St. Rep. 567 ; Perkins v. Meighan, 147 Mo. 617 , 49 S.

Brown v. McKinney

279 P.2d 343 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 30, 1954

In Davis v. … In Silmon v.

Leedy v. Brown, Judge

27 Okla. 489 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 16, 1910

State ex rel. v. Brown, Judge, 24 Okla. 435 , 103 Pac. 762 . (d) Does section 23 of said act violate sec. 1, of art. 4, of the Constitution? … Morrison v. Brown, Judge, et al., 26 Okla. 201 , 109 Pac. 25 ; Hill v. Tarver, 130 Ala. 592 . Assuming that Ered S. Caldwell, as counsel to the Governor, and J. M.

Brown Ex Rel. Brown v. Oklahoma Secondary School Activities Ass'n

125 P.3d 1219 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 8, 2005

.]; Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma v. … Morrison v. Roberts, see note 13 at ¶ 5, supra. 29 . Mahan v. Agee, see note 16, supra; Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma v.

Swift & Co. v. Brown

202 Okla. 572 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 14, 1950

Brown at about 1 A. M. on November 10th. I was called by Dr. Oglesby and Mr. Brown was confined to The Muskogee General Hospital. Mr. Brown was stuperious but not in coma and when roused was rational. … It is announced to sustain the finding as in Hollis v. Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp. and Skelly Oil Co. v. Rose, supra, and to vacate an award as in Texas Co. v. Fox, supra.

Brown v. Oklahoma City

107 Okla. 252 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 16, 1924

Shipman, Adm'r v. Brown

36 Okla. 623 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 7, 1913

Thus in Williams v. … In Finn v.

Brown v. Thompson, Treasurer

46 Okla. 446 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 18, 1915

Under the authority of Turner Hardware Co. v. John Deere Plow Co., 39 Okla. 638 , 136 Pac. 417 , the appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution. We therefore recommend that this appeal be dismissed.

Parks v. Brown Bros.

166 Okla. 204 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 14, 1933

This court, in its opinion, Brown Bros. v. … This court in its former opinion, *206 Brown v.

Brown Bros. v. Parks

155 Okla. 16 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 2, 1932

Marland Production Co. v. Hogan, 146 Okla. 220 , 294 P. 115 ; Roxana Petroleum Corporation v. Hornberger, 150 Okla. 257 , 1 P. (2d) 393 ; Southern Fuel Co. v. … In American Oil & Refining Co. v.

Board of Adjustment v. Board of Education

326 P.2d 800 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 1, 1958

Thereafter, the Board, hereinafter referred to as Applicant, appealed from said decision to the City’s Board of Adjustment, and, after a hearing before said Board, at which various owners of residential property in the same … Magnolia Petroleum Co., 206 Okl. 510, 514 , 244 P.2d 852, 857 ; Simmons v. Benson, 206 Okl. 539 , 244 P.2d 1126 ; Jones v.

Howell v. Board

185 Okla. 513 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 10, 1939

Board and M. Board, a copartnership, doing business as the Liberty Investment Company, as plaintiff, against Roy E. Howell and Chris Grenshaw, as defendants.. … In Carr v.

Board of Education v. Baldwin

192 Okla. 531 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 25, 1943

L. 1937, boards of education in independent school districts in cities of the first class possess the power and authority to maintain and operate a complete public school system of such character as the board of education … J., GIBSON, V. C. J., and OSBORN, BAYLESS, WELCH, HURST, and ARNOLD, JJ., concur. RILEY and DAVISON, JJ., absent.

Ward v. Co. Comr's. Logan Co.

12 Okla. 267 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 4, 1902

That thereafter, Rosetta Ward, Charles Hart, Ella Brown Hazzard, John V. Brown, Earl D. Brown and Merten Brown, the plaintiffs in this action, duly filed in said court their objections to the probate of said will. … Again in Keith v.

Board of Education v. Board of County Commissioners

14 Okla. 322 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 2, 1904

S. v. Buntin, 10 Fed. 730 : State v. McCain, 21 Ohio, St. 198; Ward v. Flood, 48 Cal. 36 ; Cory v. Carter, 48 Ind. 327 ; County Court of Union County v. Robinson, 27 Ark. 116 ; *332 City of Boston v. … Roberts, 5 Cush. 198 ; State v. Duffey, 7 Nev. 342 ; Clark v. Board of Directors, 24 Iowa, 256 ; Dallas v. Fosdick, 40 How. P. R. 249.

Brown v. Midwest City

380 P.2d 92 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 19, 1963

LaVoie v. Building Commission Of Trumbull, 135 Conn. 415 , 65 A.2d 165 , show that they are distinguishable from the present one. … See Bekins v. City of Tulsa, Okl., 299 P.2d 792, 794 , citing Jones v. Bayless, 208 Okl. 270, 276 , 255 P.2d 506, 513 .

Brown v. Sinclair Refining Co.

86 Okla. 143 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 2, 1922

PITCHEORD, V. C. J. … The Court of Appeals of England appears to have taken the same view in the cases of Humber Towing Co., Ltd., v. Barclay, 5 B. W. C. C. 142, and Della Rocca v. Stanley Jones & Co., 6 Neg. C. C.

Ward v. Board of County Commissioners

12 Okla. 267 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 4, 1902

That thereafter, Rosetta Ward, Charles Hart, Ella Brown Haz-zard, John V. Brown, Earl D. Brown and Merten Brown, the plaintiffs in this action, duly filed in said court their objections, to the probate of said will. … Again in Keith v.