Case law

McNac v. Brown

87 Okla. 51 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 9, 1922

The price paid by Louis Brown for the land was $1,150, and Brown paid Taylor Timothy $100 for his service in negotiating ‘the deal. … This principle has been laid down in the very able opinion by Kane, J., in First National Bank of Watonga v. Wade et al., 27 Okla. 102 , 111 Pac. 205 .

Korte v. Brown

124 Okla. 282 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 10, 1925

Brown and C. Robert Bellati, and against the plaintiff, Antonie Korte, which judgment denied the right of plaintiff to the recovery sought. … In re Cooper, 135 Fed. 196 ; Frowley v. Modoc et al. (Cal.) 110 Pac. 817 ; Hallum v. Coulter (Ky.) 73 S. W. 772 ; Smith v. Cunningham (Kan.) 53 Pac. 760 ; Trancre v. Pullman (Minn.) 29 N. W. 171 ; Dockery v.

Higgins v. Brown, Judge

20 Okla. 355 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 9, 1908

Co. v. Canter, 1 Pet. (H. S.) 511-542, 7 L. Ed. 242 ; Case v. Toftus (C. C.) 39 Fed. 733 , 5 L. R. A. 684; Territory v. Lee, 2 Mont. 130 ; Murphy *400 v. Ramsey, 114 U. S. 15 , 5 Sup. Ct. 747, 29 L. Ed. 47 ; Thompson v. … • “United States v.

Brown v. Bolen

189 Okla. 483 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 14, 1941

Long v. Brown, 186 Okla. 407 , 98 P. 2d 28 . … Long v. Brown, supra; Yaholar v. Autry, 156 Okla. 257 , 10 P. 2d 676 .

Brown v. Howard

139 Okla. 202 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 29, 1929

Brown, commenced this action in the district court of Pontotoc county on the 6th day of October, 1924, to foreclose a real estate mortgage. The defendants C. S. … In the case of Perry v.

Brown v. Benbow

36 Okla. 716 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 21, 1913

Brown against the defendants for the sum of $2,000, alleged to be due on a promissory note executed by defendants, Georgiana Ben-bow and John Benbow to Elizabeth Dean, which note was alleged to have been assigned before maturity

Brown v. Winne

92 Okla. 289 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 9, 1923

It is said by counsel for Winne and Mult-aren that the judgment of the lower court is correct because Brown’s answer disclosed a partnership, and that under the rule announced in the case of Baughman v. … The case of Baughman v.

Davis v. Brown

163 Okla. 7 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 21, 1933

Brown obtained a judgment upon a promissory note for $2,-900, on April 25, 1930, and foreclosure of a mortgage was ordered therein. December 18, 1930, plaintiff in error filed petition to vacate judgment.

Brown v. Dixon

156 Okla. 11 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 22, 1932

This is an action brought in the district court of Seminole county by Billie Brown and Robert Brown, incompetents, by their guardian, Charley Brown, against W. E. and J. L. … J., CLARK, V. C. J., and RILEY, OULLISON, SWINDALL, ANDREWS, and KORNBGAY, JJ., concur. MC-NEILL, J., absent.

Brown v. Rogers

163 Okla. 196 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 2, 1933

Guthrie v. Brown

130 Okla. 87 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 13, 1928

Brown, O, H. Toalson, and H. B. Rodecker, wbo were, on July 4, 1924, county commissioners of Washington county, and W. F. … The separate demurrers of Brown, Toalson, Rodecker, and Froebe were sustained, and that of the Road Surfacing Company was overruled.

Brown v. Taliaferro

161 Okla. 284 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 24, 1933

Coker v. Brown

206 Okla. 88 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 26, 1952

In Jones v. … HALLEY, V. C. J.', and WELCH, CORN, "GIBSON, DAVISON, JOHNSON, -and O’NEAL, JJ., concur.

Starnes v. Brown

155 Okla. 189 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 23, 1932

Fidelity & Guaranty Company did not get sufficient notice, and further complain that Brown was not an employee of Starnes at the time of the injury, but was employed by a Mr. McPeek. … J., CLARK, V. O. J.. and HEENER, OULLISON, .SWINDALL, .and ANDREWS, JJ., concur. RILE)?, J., concurs in conclusions. McNEILL, J., absent.

French v. Brown

73 Okla. 32 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 13, 1918

Brown and Mrs.' M. C. … First State Bank of Mannsville v. Howell et al. 41 Okla. 216 , 137 Pac. 657 ; Williams v. Gibson, 60 Okla. 147 , 159 Pac. 649 .

Brown Bros. v. Parks

176 Okla. 615 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 17, 1936

In Brown Bros. v. … Bros. v.

Turner v. Brown

197 Okla. 638 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 8, 1946

The trial court’s judgment reads in part: “That the V-8 Ford combination ambulance and hearse is exempt . . . for the reason that it is an ‘apparatus’ of the profession of the owner, Jesse Brown, who is a professional undertaker … . . . that the Ford V-8 automobile hearse and combination ambulance be . . . discharged from said execution levy, as exempt property, ...”

Brown v. West

28 Okla. 648 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 9, 1911

Election Board v. Elliott, 26 Okla. 546 , 109 Pac. 731 ; Miller et al. v. Ury, 23 Okla. 546 , 102 Pac. 112 . The petition is dismissed. All the Justices concur.

Brown v. Savage

78 Okla. 89 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 20, 1920

Brown and M. … Brown and M.

Brown v. Van Pelt

64 Okla. 109 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 19, 1917

Brown, W. H. Brown, and Rhoda Yarhola, as defendants. … Sussex v. Worth, Cro. Eliz. pt. 1, p. 5; Shecomb v. Hawkins, Cro. Jac. 318, Velv. 222; Winter v. Loveday, 1 Comyns Rep. 37; Sugden, Powers, p. 749 ; 4 Greenlief’s Cruise’s Dig. 165, 166; Taussig v.