Case law

Bilby v. Brown

34 Okla. 738 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 20, 1912

She had two children by a former husband, Beulah Brown (now Beulah Brown Foster) and Ada Brown. … Kennard, 28 Okla. 457 , 114 Pac. 744 ; Barnett v. Way, 29 Okla. 780 , 119 Pac. 418 ; Divine v. Harmon, 30 Okla. 820 , 121 Pac. 219 ; Morley v. Fewel, 32 Okla. 452 , 122 Pac. 700 .

Brown v. Gardner

108 Okla. 199 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 14, 1925

Co. v. Bonham, 43 Okla. 637 , 143 Pac. 600 , it is said in the syllabus: “A case-made duly served, was filed in the clerk’s office on November 20, 1913. … In the case of School District No. 1, Pontotoc County, v.

Brown v. Wilson

386 P.2d 152 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 25, 1962

In Greenshaw v. Brown, 96 Okl. 11 , 219 P. 934 , we said: “ * * *, under the holding of this court in the case of Union Trust Co. v. … In discussing this problem in Gottsch v.

Hurst v. Brown

204 Okla. 697 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 1, 1951

Elm Oil Co. v. Clark Lbr. Co., 179 Okla. 341 , 65 P. 2d 1221 ; Lyons v. Stekoll, 186 Okla. 94 , 96 P. 2d 60 ; 58 C.J.S., Mines and Minerals, §246, sub. (c). … Elm Oil Co. v. Clark Lbr. Co., supra. However, the claim is properly a lien *700 against the Payne lease in favor of Brown, the mining partner, who paid the bill. Hatten v.

Phillips v. Williams

608 P.2d 1131 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 19, 1980

Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, supra note 4, 408 U.S. at 577, 92 S.Ct. at 2709. . In Board of Regents of State Colleges v. … Dean v. Crisp, Okl.Cr., 536 P.2d 961, 963 [1975]; Jones v. Lorenzen, Okl., 441 P.2d 986, 989 [1965]; Bruce v. Everston, 180 Okl. 111 , 68 P.2d 95, 97 [1937], . Greenholtz v.

Posey v. Brown

157 Okla. 210 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 24, 1932

Brown and tlie First National Bank of Bixby, Okla. … J., CLARK, V. O. J., and RILEY, J., absent. Note. — See under (1), annotation in 26 A. L. R. 37; 36 A. L. R. 61j0; 23 R. O. L. 10; R. 'Cl L. Perm. Supp. p. 5296.

Sunfield v. Brown

171 Okla. 395 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 11, 1934

Hall v. Johns, 17 Idaho, 224 , 105 P. 71 ; Edminston v. Smith, 13 Idaho, 645 , 92 P. 842 , 14 L. R. A. (N. S.) 871, 121 Am. St. Rep. 294 ; Bank v. Baldwin, 12 Idaho, 202 , 85 P. 497 ; Holt v. … Gridley, 7 Idaho, 416 , 63 P. 188 ; Strode v. Miller, 7 Idaho, 16 , 59 P. 893 ; Jaeckel v. Pease, 6 Idaho, 131 , 53 P. 399 ; Dernham v. Rowley, 4 Idaho, 753 , 44 P. 643 ; McFarland v.

Ryan v. Brown

19 Okla. 238 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 5, 1907

Wrightsman v. Brown

181 Okla. 142 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 2, 1937

E. 1050 , and Fields v. Brown (N. C.) 76 S. E. 8 . … The cases of Jordan v. Annex Corporation, supra, *144 and Fields v. Brown, supra, are likewise inapplicable.

Perryman v. Brown

25 Okla. 138 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 9, 1909

Wells on Replevin, § 658; First National Bank of Pond Creek v. Cochran, 17 Okla. 538 , 87 Pac. 855 . … Hoisington v. Armstrong, 22 Kan. 110 ; Crawford v. Furlong, 21 Kan. 698 . But when and how may defendant show it affirmatively is the question here submitted.

Brown v. Hillman

29 Okla. 205 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 9, 1911

In support of this contention counsel cite Healy v. Loofbourrow, 2 Okla. 458 , 37 Pac. 823 ; McDonald v. Carpenter, 11 Okla. 115 , 65 Pac. 942 ; Osborne & Co. v. Case et al., 11 Okla. 479 , 69 Pac. 263 ; Harris v. … Co. v. Quinn, 57 Kan. 737 [ 48 Pac. 132 ].” Other cases to the same effect are De Ford v. Furniss, 43 Miss. 132 ; Floyd v. Ritter’s Adm’rs, 65 Ala. 501 ; Wells et al. v. Amer. Mort. Co., 109 Ala. 430 , 20 South. 136 .

Oklahoma Hospital v. Brown

87 Okla. 46 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 30, 1922

Willett v. Johnson, 13 Okla. 563 , 76 Pac. 174 ; Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Melson, 40 Okla. 1 , 134 Pac. 388 ; Ft. Smith & Western Ry. Co. v. Jones, 63 Okla. 228 , 163 Pac. 1110 ; Ft. Smith & W. Ry. Co. v. … In Kali Inla Coal Co. v.

Johnson v. Brown

180 Okla. 148 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 25, 1937

On September 17, 1935, the school board of district No. 3 appeared before the county excise board and made the contention that the transfer was illegal and void and the county excise ¡board m'ade a finding to that effect … . *150 BATLESS, V. O. X, and BUSBY, PHELPS, and GIBSON, JX, concur.

McIndoo v. Brown

125 Okla. 88 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 8, 1927

The said Davis Brown will herein be referred to as plaintiff, Nettie M. McIndoo as defendant, and Davenport, Ratcliffe & Bethel as intervener. … Nellis et al. v. Menton, 91 Okla. 75 , 216 Pac. 147 ; Gibson v. Johnson, 73 Kan. 261 , 84 Pac. 982 ; Walters v. Chance, 73 Kan. 680 ; Whitehead v. Stevens, 54 Okla. 337 , 152 Pac. 445 ; Power & Irrigation Co. v.

Clement v. Brown

103 Okla. 108 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 30, 1924

Focht, 67 Okla. 275 , 171 Pac. 730 ; Vinson v. Cook, 76 Okla. 46 , 184 Pac. 97 ; In re Green’s Estate, 80 Okla. 256 , 196 Pac. 128 . … Monahawee et al. v. Hazelwood, Co.

Brown v. Blevins

69 O.B.A.J. 3611 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 21, 1998

See Higginbotham v. Jackson, 1994 OK 8 , 869 P.2d 319 . “The privilege is waived only to the extent of the condition claimed to have been caused by the negligence of the tortfeasor.” Nitzel v. … See Dobson v. Edwards, 1998 OK 62 , 958 P.2d 168 ; General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Carpenter, 1978 OK 39, ¶ 10 , 576 P.2d 1166, 1168 . All Justices Concur.

Brown v. Tucker

189 Okla. 615 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 18, 1941

Graf Packing Co. v. Palphrey, 178 Okla. 95 , 62 P. 2d 53 ; Boswell v. Ingram, 104 Okla. 240 , 230 P. 909 ; Southwestern Electric Co. v. Nunn Electric Co., 80 Okla. 6 , 193 P. 973 . … J., CORN, V. C. J., and HURST, DAVISON, and ARNOLD, JJ., concur. RILEY, OSBORN, BAYLESS, and GIBSON, JJ., absent.

Schuman v. Brown

180 Okla. 130 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 25, 1937

Brown to recover possession of real property under the Forcible Entry and Detainer Act (see. 917, O. S. 1931). … In Hart v.

Brown v. Eddings

88 Okla. 30 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 12, 1922

Co. v. Runkle, 81 Okla. 106 . 197 Pac. 153 ; Lawton National Bank v. Ulrich. 81 Okla. 159 , 197 Pac. 167 : Stinehcomb v. Oklahoma City. 81 Okla. 102 , 197 Pac. 437 ; Harrison v. M. … Koehler Co., 82 Okla. 26 , 198 Pac. 295 ; Obialero v. Henryetta Spelter Co., 82 Okla. 274 , 200 Pac. 143 ; Russell & Washington v. Robertson, 82 Okla. 283 , 200 Pac. 150 ; Incorporated Town of Kusa v.

Brown v. Minter

86 Okla. 268 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 27, 1922

Brown and Josephine ¡Brown, minor children of the said Joe Brown, filed a protest against admitting said will to probate, and upon hearing the protest was overruled, and the will admitted to probate. … The third bequest was the remainder of the estate to be divided equally beween his wife, Ella Brown, his son, Odis L. Brown, and his daughter, Josephine L. Brown.