Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersokla

2,305 results

0.13s

  • Simons v. McDaniel

    154 Okla. 168 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 19, 1932

    In either event the right to drill is restricted to the term of the lease as established by the habendum clause. … The latter alternative is becoming an established custom in the business.

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • HENSLEY v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY CO.

    398 P.3d 11 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 20, 2017

    of the United States, 55 the court stated where evidence is introduced concerning a doubt as to what party is to receive the benefit of an insurance policy, parol evidence is admissible; and although the insurance policy clearly … May, 2006 OK 100, ¶ 25 , 151 P.3d at 141 ("One to whom, by the express terms of a contract, no obligation is due from its promissor, cannot qualify for the status of an intended or impjied third-party beneficiary.''). 22

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • In Re Skelton Lead & Zinc Co.'s Gross Production Tax for 1919

    81 Okla. 134 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 5, 1921

    the same rate of “property tax,” to which other property within the state is subject, or whether, being fortunate enough to have obtained a lease upon Indian lands, his personal property, by reason of such fact, shall be immune … So are steamboats, horses, stage coaches, foundries, ship yards,- and multitudes, of manufacturing establishments.

    Cited 31 timesPublished
  • Skelly Oil Co. v. Johnson

    157 Okla. 278 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 31, 1932

    The Chief Executive appoints the Commissioners, and any layman is qualified to sit upon the Commission if he holds the Governor’s commission giving him authority. … Most clearly, at the time of the injury, Bice was the foreman under whom the boy was working, whether he be strictly a gang pusher or one with superintending power.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • OSAGE NATION v. BD. OF COMMISSIONERS OF OSAGE COUNTY and OSAGE NATION v. OSAGE COUNTY BD. OF ADJUSTMENT

    2017 OK 34 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 2, 2017

    The Baptist Foundation of Oklahoma , 2002 OK 57, ¶ 9, 50 P.3d 1132, 1138. 31 The former practice in Oklahoma of using a demurrer to challenge a petition allowed laches to be raised by demurrer when laches clearly appeared … standing is when plaintiff sues to secure judicial relief that would benefit a public entity or the community as a whole, but Hohfeldian standing is when a plaintiff seeks to adjudicate his or her claimed right, privilege, immunity

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • HENSLEY v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY CO.

    398 P.3d 11 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 20, 2017

    the United States , 55 the court stated where evidence is introduced concerning a doubt as to what party is to receive the benefit of an insurance policy, parol evidence is admissible; and although the insurance policy clearly … FOOTNOTES 1 16 O.S.2011 § 11A states in part: All contracts for deed for purchase and sale of real property made for the purpose or with the intention of receiving the payment of money and made for the purpose of establishing

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.