Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
2,305 results
0.78s
STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. BAILEY
2023 OK 34 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 4, 2023
The panel found the allegations on all counts to be established and recommended respondent be suspended for the practice of law for two years and one day. … Collins clearly had an impression respondent could influence the prosecutors.
Cited 1 timesPublished422 P.3d 143 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 26, 2018
The mother moved for partial summary adjudication in the case, arguing that Phillips's conviction for the crimes establishes his liability for the torts. … If the court must qualify an Alford plea as one or the other, as the majority suggests, I would find that an Alford plea more closely resembles a plea of nolo contendere .
Cited 11 timesPublishedUnited States ex rel. Search v. Choctaw, Oklahoma & Gulf Railroad
3 Okla. 404 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 15, 1895
that where relief is sought merely for the pro *471 tection of private rights, the relator must show some separate and distinct personal interest in the matter, since he is regarded as the real party and his rights must clearly … The power given by these acts was by the act of August 24, 1894, vested in the defendant railroad company with “all the powers, rights, immunities, *488 privileges and franchises which have been heretofore granted to, or
Cited 6 timesPublished394 P.3d 1224 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 2, 2017
The former practice in Oklahoma of using a demurrer to challenge a petition allowed laches to be raised by demurrer when laches clearly appeared on the face of the petition. May v. City Nat. … standing is when plaintiff sues to secure judicial relief that would benefit a public entity or the community as a whole, but Hohfeldian standing is when a plaintiff seeks to adjudicate his or her claimed right, privilege, immunity
Cited 41 timesPublished143 Okla. 147 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 4, 1930
S. 1921, omits the qualifying words “as the court may deem proper.” … Justice Harrison, to concur in the establishment of a rule of law by this court to permit infants “like bleating lambs to be led to slaughter” and gutted of their property, with posting of notice directed to their parents
Cited 12 timesPublished164 Okla. 273 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 22, 1932
I regard no rule of law founded on sounder grounds nor more firmly established than that announced by this court in Hill v. … And plaintiffs’ suit in ejectment was clearly at law.
Cited 8 timesPublishedSTATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. BEDNAR
441 P.3d 91 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 12, 2019
Learning about the lawsuit on their own, each of the judges moved to dismiss the case on June 8, 2016, through private counsel and the Attorney General's Office, based on failure to state a claim and judicial immunity. ¶ … It was later established that Respondent had in fact been notified of the deposition and had even exchanged several e-mails with opposing counsel attempting to reschedule it.
Cited 8 timesPublishedSTATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. BEDNAR
2019 OK 12 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 12, 2019
Learning about the lawsuit on their own, each of the judges moved to dismiss the case on June 8, 2016, through private counsel and the Attorney General's Office, based on failure to state a claim and judicial immunity. … It was later established that Respondent had in fact been notified of the deposition and had even exchanged several e-mails with opposing counsel attempting to reschedule it.
Cited 5 timesPublishedSTATE OF OKLAHOMA ex rel OBA v. DURBIN
2025 OK 77 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 21, 2025
Respondent did not make a record of facts at his trial panel hearing concerning the motions to quash, and he cannot rely upon allegations of fact raised in a post-hearing motion as if they qualify as facts shown of record … If Hirstov was respondent's client then respondent clearly violated the ORPC and RGDP as indicated by the trial panel.
Cited 1 timesPublished9 Okla. 156 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 7, 1899
It was clearly the intention of the appellant to take the money only upon failure to reverse the judgment on appeal. * * When the offer was made to allow a judgment to be entered for the refunding of the money paid in discharge … Latham, 143 U.S. 556 , that: "We have no desire to weaken or qualify in any way the wholesome doctrine laid down by this court in the case of Michoud v.
Cited 61 timesPublishedSTATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. BAILEY
2023 OK 34 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 4, 2023
Collins clearly had an impression respondent could influence the prosecutors. … Gassaway , 2008 OK 60 , ¶ 56, 196 P.3d 495 , 507 ("evidence clearly contradicted several of [a person's] versions of events ...
Cited 0 timesPublished2024 OK 28 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 23, 2024
Mother contends that M.R. did not have any physical damage and therefore the State did not meet its burden of establishing heinous and shocking abuse. Dr. … Here the grounds found in § 1-4-809 were clearly established in the order, regardless if the box was not checked. Further, paragraphs 2 and 3 of 10A O.S. § 1-4-707(C) are both conditional determinations.
Cited 4 timesPublished151 Okla. 12 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 21, 1931
Walter Gray: To which the defendants object for the reason that this witness is not shown qualified to answer this question; and the question is wholly incompetent, irrelevant, and immaterial. … This and the next instruction clearly call into prominence things calculated to arouse prejudice.
Cited 6 timesPublishedCox v. Oklahoma Tax Commission
197 Okla. 12 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 16, 1946
Cas. 1918E, 81; English on Interpretation of Statutes, par. 414, or, more aptly stated, “by what is known as the doctrine of ‘last antecedent’, relative and qualifying words, phrases, and clauses are to be applied to the … The Referendum Act was clearly designed as one of suppression and not of supervision. It relaxed merely the alcoholic content of those things capable of being used as a beverage.
Cited 7 timesPublishedSTATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. BAILEY
2023 OK 34 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 4, 2023
The panel found the allegations on all counts to be established and recommended respondent be suspended for the practice of law for two years and one day. … Collins clearly had an impression respondent could influence the prosecutors.
Cited 0 timesPublished50 Okla. 710 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 13, 1915
Jones as three disinterested householders of said McAlester township to appraise said property, who on the 4th day of September, 1909, qualified as such appraisers, and on said date made a return of their appraisement on … We simply pass upon the case as presented to us by the petition and demurrers, which to our mind clearly present a case in which the plaintiff is entitled to be heard upon its merits.
Cited 4 timesPublishedSTATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. BAILEY
2023 OK 34 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 4, 2023
The panel found the allegations on all counts to be established and recommended respondent be suspended for the practice of law for two years and one day. … Collins clearly had an impression respondent could influence the prosecutors.
Cited 0 timesPublishedSTATE ex rel. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF OKLAHOMA v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON
499 P.3d 719 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 9, 2021
It must be clearly and plainly expressed.") … Officers Cite Name Level 51 O.S. 1 , Beginning of Term - Time of Qualifying Cited Title 63.
Cited 13 timesPublishedDON KEENAN v. TODD RUSS, in his capacity as the Treasurer of the State of Oklahoma
2026 OK 20 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 7, 2026
." ¶27 Appellate review of an order granting a preliminary injunction examines whether an abuse of discretion occurred, "when a decision is clearly against the weight of the evidence, contrary to law, or contrary to established … Not later than the ninetieth day after the date the financial company receives notice under paragraph 1 of this subsection, the financial company shall cease boycotting energy companies to avoid qualifying for divestment
Cited 1 timesPublishedState Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Association v. Pacenza
136 P.3d 616 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 18, 2006
Rule 1.3, Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings, 5 O.S.2001, Ch. 1, App. 1-A clearly provides that a lawyer committing any act contrary to prescribed standards of conduct, whether in the course of professional capacity … paperwork on the place during the repossession and had brought the title opinion up to date and everything was current and he was a real estate attorney and he would take care of everything with the house and he was very qualified
Cited 34 timesPublished
Ask Donna