Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersokla

10,000+ results

1.74s

  • Board of Ed. of Independent School Dist. No. 15 v. Castle

    168 Okla. 399 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 22, 1934

    In the cases of Board of Commissioners of Carter County v. First National Bank of Berwsrn, 159 Okla. 283 , 15 P. (2d) 7 , and Dodd, Mead & Co. v. … Co. v. Schmidt, 177 U. S. 230 , 20 S. Ct. 620, 622 , 44 L. Ed. 747 ; Iowa Cent. Ry. Co. v. Iowa, 160 U. S. 389 , 16 S. Ct. 344 , 40 L. Ed. 467 ; Wilson v. North Carolina, 169 U. S. 586 , 18 S. Ct. 435 , 42 L. Ed. 865 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • National Surety Co. v. Board of Edu. of City of Hugo

    62 Okla. 259 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 23, 1917

    United States v. Walsh, 115 Fed. 697 , 52 C. C. A. *262 419; Cannon v. Hunt, 116 Ga. 452 , 42 S. E. 734 ; and Ludlow Lumber Co. v. Kuhling, 119 Ky. 251 , 83 SW 634 , 115 Am. St. Rep. 254 . … Callahan & Co. v. Chickasha Cotton Oil Co., 17 Okla. 544 , 87 Pac. 331 ; Wiebener v. Peoples, 44 Okla. 32 , 142 Pac. 1036 , Ann. Cas. 1916E, 748.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Bert Smith Road Machinery Co. v. Board of County Commissioners

    486 P.2d 639 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 25, 1971

    Oklahoma City v. Green Construction Co., 184 Okl. 98 , 84 P.2d 623 ; Mid-Continent Pipe Line Co. v. Seminole County Excise Board, 194 Okl. 40 , 146 P.2d 996 . … Co., 157 Okl. 131 , 11 P.2d 189 .” *643 See also Mid-Continent Pipe Line Co. v. Seminole County Excise Board, 194 Okl. 40 , 146 P.2d 996 (1944).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Lowden v. Alfalfa County Excise Board

    182 Okla. 607 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 3, 1938

    Excise Board of Carter County, 164 Okla. 126 , 23 P.2d 189 . There is nothing contained in article 7, chapter 50, or article 9, chapter 66, S. … BAYLESS, V. C. J., and RILEY, PHELPS, CORN, and HURST, JX, concur. GIBSON, X, dissents. OSBORN, C. J., and DAVISON, J., absent.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Board of Educ., Ind. Sch. Dist. No. One

    339 P.2d 534 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 5, 1959

    In the first paragraph of the syllabus to Board of Education of City of Ardmore v. State ex rel. … Friend v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Messer-Bowers Co. v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Water Resources Board

    71 O.B.A.J. 1775 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 5, 2000

    Further, this Court held in Oklahoma Water Resources Board v. … Board v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Brisco v. State Ex Rel. Board of Regents of Agricultural & Mechanical Colleges

    394 P.3d 1251 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 2, 2017

    . ¶ 3 Brisco brought a claim for breach of contract against the appellants, the State of Oklahoma and the Board of Regents of Agricultural and Mechanical Colleges. … Boatman v. Boatman, 2017 OK 27, ¶ 16 , — P.3d —; Eagle Bluff, L.L.C. v. Taylor, 2010 OK 47, ¶ 16 , 237 P.3d 173 (quoting Kay v. Venezuelan Sun Oil Co., 1991 OK 16, ¶ 5 , 806 P.2d 648, 650 ). 11 . Beard v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • St. Louis-San Francisco R. Co. v. Bryan County Excise Board

    271 P.2d 389 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 1, 1954

    In its present appeal from said decision, protestant recognizes, on authority of Oklahoma County Excise Board v. Kurn, 189 Okl. 203 , 115 P.2d 113 , and Protest of Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. … Co. v. Pourron, 118 Okl. 80 , 246 P. 835 , quoted from extensively therein, was an increase by the Excise Board of a township’s estimate.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Board of County Commissioners v. Daneley

    17 Okla. 200 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 5, 1906

    Such clerk shall be allowed by the board a reasonable compensation for such services.” … Harris Finley v. The Territory of Oklahoma, 12 Okla. 621 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Texas County Irrigation & Water Resources Ass'n v. Dunnett

    527 P.2d 578 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 15, 1974

    The application of this rule has recently been modified by Brown v. Banking Board, 512 P.2d 166, 167 (Okl. 1973). … The Brown decision recognized the substantial evidence rule as promulgated by the U.S. Supreme Court in Universal Camera Corp. v. National L. R.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Stillwater Industrial Foundation, Inc. v. State ex rel. Board of Regents

    541 P.2d 173 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 23, 1975

    The Choctaw and Chickasaw Nations v. Board of County Commissioners, 10 Cir., 361 F.2d 932 . In Palmer v. … In the case of Stewart v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Gilchrist v. Board of Review of the Oklahoma Employment Security Commission

    75 O.B.A.J. 1765 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 15, 2004

    Vester v. … Board of Review of Oklahoma Employment Securities Commission, 1985 OK 21, ¶ 15 , 697 P.2d 533, 538 . Gilchrist’s testimony in the criminal prosecutions described in Mitchell v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • J. B. Klein Iron & Foundry Co. v. Board of County Com'rs

    178 Okla. 72 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 27, 1936

    In the ease of Board of County Commissioners of McCurtain County v. … Fairbanks-Morse Company v. City of Geary, supra.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Oklahoma State Board of Examiners of Certified Shorthand Reporters v. Thompson

    75 O.B.A.J. 3220 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 14, 2004

    DISCUSSION {8 Respondent testified that she was called to appear at a hearing before Judge Haney with regard to her work in Conover v. State, for the purpose of correcting the transcripts. … Supp.1980, Section 106.4, or any other duties prescribed by law or rule of the Board. . The Court of Criminal Appeals referred this matter to the Board in Conover v. State of Oklahoma, 1999 OK CR 26 , 990 P.2d 291 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Lowden v. Stephens County Excise Board

    177 Okla. 33 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 5, 1936

    The protest questioning the authority of the excise board to so act was denied. In St. Louis S. F. Ry. Co. v. … Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • School Dist. No. 65 v. Board of Com'rs of Payne County

    148 Okla. 5 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 10, 1931

    No. 49 v. Wolfe, 94 Okla. 87 . 221 Pac. 42 ; Fowler v. Green, 73 Okla. 319 . 176 Pac. 222 ; School Dist. No. 9, Tulsa County, v. Board,, etc., 138 Okla. 254 , 280 Pac. 807 . … Board of Education of the City of Pond Creek v. Francis Boyer, etc., 5 Okla. 225 , 47 Pac. 1090 .

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Summers v. State ex rel. Board of Examiners in Optometry

    487 P.2d 706 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 13, 1971

    Boydston v. State, Okl., 277 P.2d 138 (1954); Oliver v. Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, Okl., 359 P.2d 183 (1965). The evidence does not support the Board’s finding of collusion between Dr. … Dunbar v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Wood v. Lydick

    523 P.2d 1082 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 18, 1974

    Lydick v. Brown, 516 P.2d 239 (1973). Recount is therefore a creature of the statutory law and is provided only for candidates for elective office and this by virtue of 26 O. S.1971 §§ 391 and 392. … Lydick v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • City of Picher v. Board of Com'rs of Ottawa County

    166 Okla. 183 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 14, 1933

    Briefs were filed before the decision of this court in Brown, County Treas., v. Board of Ed. of City of Duncan, 148 Okla. 97 , 298 P. 249 ; and Board of Co. Com’rs v. City of Marlow, 148 Okla. 126 , 298 P. 255 . … CULLISON, V. O. X, and S WIND ALL, ANDREWS, McNEILL, OSBORN, and BUSBY, XL, concur. BAYLESS and WELCH, XL, absent.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • First American Bank & Trust Co. v. Board of County Commissioners

    530 P.2d 121 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 5, 1974

    See also Jones v. Blaine, 149 Okl. 153 , 300 P. 369, 370 (1931). … The Board should compute the levy and advertise the estimate as set forth in 68 O.S.1971, § 2487(3) which states that the Board shall: “Examine the content of the estimate of needs, and if the governing board has failed to

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.