Case law

Board of Ed. of School Dist. No. 16 v. Barrow

139 Okla. 109 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 17, 1929

The requirement that the board of education shall not pay any teacher for his services except upon written contract by the board and teacher, approved by the county superintendent, cannot be circumvented by such procedure … The law of this case has been found by this court in the case of Means, Supt., v. Vernon, 108 Okla. 123 , 235 Pae. 163.

RE: SUSPENSION OF CERTIFICATES OF CERTIFIED SHORTHAND REPORTERS

2017 OK 21 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 20, 2017

ORDER The Oklahoma Board of Examiners of Certified Shorthand Reporters has recommended to the Supreme Court of the State of Oklahoma the suspension of the certificate of each of the Oklahoma Certified Shorthand Court Reporters … /S/CHIEF JUSTICE ALL JUSTICES CONCUR Exhibit Name CSR # Reason Shelly Brown 1669 Continuing Education Sherri Brown 1925 Continuing Education/Renewal Rebecca Coffman 1018 Continuing Education/Renewal Kelley Dalton 1919 Continuing

Cleal v. Higginbotham

49 Okla. 362 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 16, 1915

Counsel for plaintiffs in error rely upon Woolsey et al. v. Nelson et al., 43 Okla. 97 , 141 Pac. 436 , and State ex rel. West, Atty. Gen., v. Balzar, 43 Okla. 200 , 141 Pac. 777 , to support their contention. … Brown v. Hallaway’s Estate, 47 Colo. 461 , 108 Pac. 25 ; Ex Parte Sharp, 15 Idaho, 120 , 96 Pac. 563 , 18 L. R. A. (N. S.) 886; State v. District Court, 38 Mont. *365 119, 99 Pac. 139 ; Garcia v.

L. S. Cogswell Lbr. Co. v. Foltz

135 Okla. 242 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 29, 1929

Foltz, for one Lamar Brown, situated elsewhere in the city of Tulsa. The proof was reasonably satisfactory that the material was used on the Lamar Brown job. … Klein Iron & Foundry Co., 104 Okla. 125 , 230 Pac. 734 ; Board of Education of Oklahoma City v. Thurman, 121 Okla. 108 , 247 Pac. 996 . The argument presented by counsel for defendants is not entirely without merit.

Territory of Oklahoma Ex Rel. Stevens v. Brown

14 Okla. 380 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 3, 1904

Brown, as probate judge of the county of Comanche, Territory of Oklahoma, to ■ compel the said defendant, as such probate judge, to report to the board of county commissioners all fees received and collected by him in entering … Crum, 13 Okla. 9 , 73 Pac. 297 ; and Finley v. Territory, 12 Okla. 621 , 73 Pac. 273 . The petition for a peremptory writ of mandamus is therefore denied, and the case is dismissed. Burford, 0.

Muskogee County Excise Board v. Kurn

192 Okla. 701 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 3, 1943

This is an appeal by Muskogee County Excise Board against J. M. Kurn and John G. Lonsdale, trustees, St. … The appeal is dismissed on the authority of Harper County, Okla., Excise Board v.

School Dist. No. 9 of Tulsa County v. Board of Com'rs

138 Okla. 254 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 24, 1929

Riley v. City of Lawton, 101 Okla. 176 , 224 Pac. 347 ; Mills v. Lynch, 121 Okla. 101 , 247 Pac. 981 ; Consolidated School Dist. No. 72 v. Board, etc., 113 Okla. 217 , 242 Pac. 173 ; School Dist. … No. 39 v. Wolfe, Co.

Brown v. American Surety Co. of New York

110 Okla. 253 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 16, 1925

Gillespie v. Frisbie, 46 Okla. 438 , 148 Pac. 991 ; U. S. v. Hobson et al., 10 Wall, 395, 19, L. Ed. 937. … In the case of National Surety Company v.

State v. Board of Educ., Ind. Sch. Dist. No. One

339 P.2d 534 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 5, 1959

In the first paragraph of the syllabus to Board of Education of City of Ardmore v. State ex rel. … Friend v.

Board of Com'rs v. City Nat. Bank of Ft. Smith

183 Okla. 137 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 14, 1938

Plaintiff recovered judgment; against the “board of county commissioners *138 of Pushmataha county” for violation of a garnishment order, on the ground that monies were paid to the defendant by said board., after it had been … of education, school board or any municipal subdivision of the state under the provisions of this act.-’ The statute is plain and unambiguous.

Neel v. BOARD OF CTY. COM'RS OF CHEROKEE CTY.

617 P.2d 201 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 9, 1980

617 P.2d 201 (1980) Betty NEEL, County Treasurer of Cherokee County, Oklahoma, suing for herself and for those County Employees similarly situated, Appellants, v. … The case of Federal Corporation v.

Bean v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Board of Bar Examiners

766 P.2d 955 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 4, 1988

Mid-Continent Pipe Line Co. v. Creek County Excise Board

197 Okla. 217 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 4, 1946

The excise board levied a tax of 15.5 mills for school district No. 12. Protestants attack 2.5 mills of the levy as being illegal. … The governing board did certify, as above shown, but that certificate, in the absence of a proper resolution, is wholly insufficient to require the excise board to “refund” the money. The protest was properly denied.

Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Board of Com'rs

121 Okla. 294 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 19, 1926

McMillian v. Holcomb

66 O.B.A.J. 3471 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 31, 1995

City, Inc. v. Board of Education of Ind. School Dist., etc., 576 P.2d 1157 (Okla.1978). … Plaintiffs cite Board of County Commissioners of Creek County v.

St. Louis-San Francisco R. Co. v. Bryan County Excise Board

271 P.2d 389 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 1, 1954

In its present appeal from said decision, protestant recognizes, on authority of Oklahoma County Excise Board v. Kurn, 189 Okl. 203 , 115 P.2d 113 , and Protest of Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. … Co. v. Pourron, 118 Okl. 80 , 246 P. 835 , quoted from extensively therein, was an increase by the Excise Board of a township’s estimate.

Oklahoma City Zoological Trust v. State Ex Rel. Public Employees Relations Board

158 P.3d 461 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 10, 2007

See Id.; Brown ex rel. Brown v. Oklahoma Secondary School Activities Ass'n., 2005 OK 88, ¶ 11 , 125 P.3d 1219, 1225 . 5 . Star Fruits S.N.C. v. U.S., 393 F.3d 1277, 1281 (Fed.Cir.2005). 6 . … See McGee v. Alexander, 2001 OK 78, ¶ 29 , 37 P.3d 800, 807 (citing Garrison v.

Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad v. Haynes

8 Okla. 576 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 25, 1899

(Goodson v. U. S. 7 Okla. 117 , 54 Pac. 423 ; U. S. v. Berry, 4 Fed. 785 ; State v. Mayor, etc., of Village of Perrysburg, 14 Ohio St. 472 ; Brown v. Commissioners, 21 Pa. St. 43; Van Denburgh v. President, etc., 66 N. … Colgan, [Cal.] 44 Pac. 238 ; State v. La Grave, [Nev.] 48 Pac. 195 ; Bartlett v. Inhabitants of City of Trenton, 38 N. J. Law, 67; Hoey v. Gilroy, 129 N. Y. 132 , 29 N. E. 85 ; Wormser v. Brown, 149 N. Y. 163 , 43 N.

State ex rel. Board of Regents v. Oklahoma Merit Protection Commission

72 O.B.A.J. 639 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 12, 2001

Let the writ issue to prohibit the Oklahoma Merit Protection Commission, a legislatively created agency, from exercising jurisdiction over petitioners (the Board of Regents for Oklahoma State University and the Agricultural … See, e.g., Workers' Compensation Court v.

Board of Regents of Oklahoma Colleges v. Walter Nashert & Sons, Inc.

456 P.2d 524 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 1, 1969

This rule is stated as follows in Freeling v. … In Lippert Bros. v.