Case law

Austin, Nichols & Co. v. Oklahoma County Board of Tax-Roll Corrections

578 P.2d 1200 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 9, 1978

On July 5, 1977, the Trial Court rendered its decision affirming the Board. … London Square Village v. Oklahoma County Equalization and Excise Board, 559 P.2d 1224 (Okl.1976).

State Ex Rel. v. Board of Com'rs of Lincoln County

197 Okla. 605 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 22, 1946

Schilling v. Oklahoma City, 67 Okla. 18 , 168 P. 227 . Defendants rely upon Estill v. Board of Com’rs of Pontotoc County, 119 Okla. 215 , 249 P. 394 , and Gooch v. Drumright, 88 Okla. 244 , 212 P. 991 . … J., HURST, V. C. J., and RILEY, OSBORN, BAYLESS, and DAVISON, JJ., concur.

Oklahoma Operating Co. v. State Dry Cleaners Board of Oklahoma

306 P.2d 295 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 15, 1957

In the case of Jack Lincoln Shops, Inc., v. … See, also, State Dry Cleaners’ Board v. Compton, 201 Okl. 284 , 205 P.2d 286 .

Kay County, Excise Board v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.

185 Okla. 327 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 27, 1939

WELCH, V. C. J. The excise board approved the annual budget of this independent school district, including an item appropriated to buy band uniforms. … Koetteritz v. Board of Sup’rs of Herkimer County, 132 N. Y. Supp. 808, 810 ) 148 App. Div. 392 .” 3 Words & Phrases (2d Series) 541.

Board of Trustees of the Police Pension & Retirement System v. Kern

366 P.2d 415 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 7, 1961

See the discussions in Police Pension and Relief Board of City and County of Denver v. McPhail, 139 Colo. 330 , 338 P.2d 694 ; Robinson v. … Police Pension Board, 85 Ariz. 384 , 339 P.2d 739 ; Police Pension Board for City of Tucson v. Denney, 84 Ariz. 394 , 330 P.2d 1 ; Terry v. City Of Berkeley, 41 Cal.2d 698 , 263 P.2d 833, 836 ; State ex rel. Stringer v.

Skouby v. Board of Ed. of School Dist. No. 60

143 Okla. 272 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 27, 1930

Doctors Oil Co. v. Adair, 83 Okla. 53 , 200 Pac. 858 ; Teter v. Board of Education, 85 Okla. 16 , 204 Pac. 129 ; Drummond v. City of Ada, 86 Okla. 32 , 206 Pac. 200 ; Atkins v. Page, 86 Okla. 308 , 208 Pac. 824 . … Teter v. Board of Education; Drummond v. City of Ada, supra.” That rule has been followed by this court, and in Simms v.

Board of Trustees of Pol. Pen. Ret. Sys v. Faris

470 P.2d 981 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 12, 1970

referred to merely as the “Board”. … BERRY, V. C. J., and DAVISON, WILLIAMS, HODGES, LAVENDER and McINERNEY, JJ., concur. IRWIN, C. J., and JACKSON, J., concur in result.

Board of Ed. of City of Sapulpa v. American Nat.

105 Okla. 120 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 30, 1924

Title Guaranty & Surety Co. v. Slinker, 35 Okla. 128 , 128 Pac. 696 ; Pauls Valley Compress & Storage Co. v. … Bison v. Walker. SO Okla. 237, 195 Pac. 899 ; Morris v. Purcell B. & T. Co., 85 Okla. 45 ; 204 Pile. 436.

Board of Trustees of the Firemen's Relief & Pension Fund v. Brooks

179 Okla. 600 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 13, 1937

Parker v. Lynch, 7 Okla. 631 , 56 P. 1082 ; Bockfinger v. Foster, 10 Okla. 488 , 62 P. 709 ; Fehr v. Black Pet. Corp., 103 Okla. 241 , 229 P. 1049 . … In the case of Wilson v.

Board of Education of Independent School District Number One v. Clendenning

431 P.2d 382 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 18, 1967

In Duncan v. … State v. Williams, 40 S.C. 373 , 19 S.E. 5 ; State v. Brown, 14 S.C. 380 ; Caldwell v. State, 12 Wyo. 206 , 74 P. 496 .”

Muskogee Urban Renewal Authority v. Excise Board of Muskogee County

66 O.B.A.J. 2124 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 27, 1995

V. CONCLUSION The legislation authorizing tax increment financing is constitutional on its face. It does not usurp the power of the county excise board, Okla. … Reherman v. Oklahoma Resources Bd., 679 P.2d 1296 (Okla.1984). 22 . We recognize that the functions of the county excise board in approving estimated needs and apportioning tax millage are discretionary. Summey v.

Craig County Excise Board v. Texas-Empire Pipe Line Co.

195 Okla. 627 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 3, 1945

Board of Commissioners of Harmon Co. v. Oklahoma Tax Commission, 191 Okla. 155 , 127 P. 2d 1052 . In the case of Delaware County Excise Board v. St. … Protestant also cites Aaronson v. Smiley, County Treasurer, supra; Gallion v. Excise Board of Oklahoma County, 171 Okla. 76 , 42 P. 2d 508 ; Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Excise Board of Love Co., supra; Keith v.

Sinclair Prairie Pipe Line Co. v. Excise Board of Tulsa County

173 Okla. 375 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 18, 1935

Faught v. City of Sapulpa, supra. It is contended by the protestee that the holding in the case of Board of County Commissioners of Rogers County v. … Wood et al. v. Kimbrell et al., 152 Okla. 239 , 5 P. (2d) 366 ; Board of Com’rs of Carter County v. First Nat. Bank of Berwyn et al., 159 Okla. 283 , 15 P. (2d) 6 .

Board of County Com'rs v. City of Wewoka Ex Rel. North

191 Okla. 142 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 30, 1942

The bondholder relies on Schuman v. Board of County Commissioners, 184 Okla. 339 , 87 P. 2d 151 , which holds that a valid resale to the county extinguishes the ad valorem tax lien. … S. 1941 §1; State v. Passmore, above.

Texas County Irrigation & Water Resources Ass'n v. Oklahoma Water Resources Board

61 O.B.A.J. 3027 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 13, 1990

For the earlier appeal see Oklahoma Water Resources Board v. … See Magnolia Pipeline Company v. Oklahoma Tax Commission, infra note 14, 167 P.2d at 888; Board of Educ., Vici Pub. Schools v. Morris, Okl., 656 P.2d 258, 261 [1983], . Magnolia Pipeline Company v.

Kiowa County Excise Board v. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co.

301 P.2d 677 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 31, 1956

Board of Com’rs of Marshall County v. Shaw, 199 Okl. 66 , 182 P.2d 507, 513 . … « ⅝ ⅝ » In Excise Board of Oklahoma County v.

Atlas Life Ins. v. Board of Education of City of Tulsa

83 Okla. 12 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 2, 1921

In Davidson v. … In French v.

School Dist. No. 7 v. Board of Com'rs of Creek County

135 Okla. 1 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 7, 1928

S. 1921; Railway Co. v. … The contentions herein by the plaintiff have Keen recently decided against it in the case of Board of Education of City of Sapulpa v. Board of Commissioners of Creek County, 127 Okla. 132 , 260 Pac. 22 .

Empire Pipe Line Co. v. Excise Board of Carter County

164 Okla. 126 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 13, 1933

X, CULLISON, V. O. X, and SWINDALL, McNE'ILL, BAYLESS, BUSBY, and WELCH, JX, concur. OSBORN, J., absent.

CHILDERS v. ARROWOOD

2023 OK 74 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 20, 2023

Fanning v. Brown , , ¶ 8, , 845. Likewise, legal questions involving statutory interpretation are subject to de novo review. Cole v. Josey , , ¶ 3, , 1009. … Second, the Arrowoods cite Brown v. McAnally , 644 P.2d 1153 (Wash. 1982).