Case law

Strahm v. Board of Trustees of the Benevolent & Protective Order

203 Okla. 635 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 21, 1950

The governing law is clearly stated in paragraph 1 of the editorial syllabus in Lacy v. … And on July 14, 1948, defendant appeared before the Board where the matter was discussed. Defendant had been paying the sum of $260 per month as rental.

Huckins Hotel Co. v. Board of Com'rs of Oklahoma County

64 Okla. 235 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 9, 1916

Carrico et al. v. Crocker et al., 38 Okla. 440 . 133 Pac. 181 ; Board of Com’rs v. Tinklepaugh, 49 Okla. 440 , 152 Pac. 1119 . … Mellon Co. v. McCafferty, 239 U. S. 134 , 36 Sup. Ct. 94, 60 L. Ed. 181 ; Stanley v. Board of Supervisors, supra.

Board of Education of City of Muskogee v. Valeur

71 Okla. 100 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 8, 1918

Valeur, who will be referred to as plaintiff, brought suit against the board of education of the city of Muskogee, who will be referred to as defendant, to recover the sum of $75 alleged to be due him as salary from August … It is admitted that plaintiff was employed by the board of education at a salary of $150 per month, and that on July 31st a resolution was adopted that his services be dispensed with on August 15th.

Estate of Crowell Ex Rel. Boen v. Board of County Commissioners

237 P.3d 134 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 26, 2010

Manley v. Brown, 1999 OK 79 , 1 22, 989 P.2d 448, 455 . … Wilson v.

Old Reliable Mutual Insurance Co. v. State Insurance Board

294 P.2d 294 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 21, 1956

The Board denied Company’s application. … The order of the Board is therefore affirmed. JOHNSON, C. J., and HALLEY, BLACKBIRD, JACKSON and HUNT, JJ-, concur.

Tulsa County, Excise Board v. Texas-Empire Pipe Line Co.

188 Okla. 128 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 17, 1940

WELCH, V. C. J. … See Gallion v. Excise Board of Oklahoma County, 171 Okla. 76 , 42 P. 2d 508 . We examine now to determine whether such funds become a part of the county general fund.

Texas Pipe Line Co. v. Tulsa County Excise Board

200 Okla. 679 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 16, 1948

contemplate such computation by a county excise board or that such information as is necessary in making such com- ■ putation will necessarily be compiled ' and available to the county board at ' the time such board is required … each 'governing board files its request for appropriations.

Linn v. Board of Education of City of Chickasha

40 Okla. 742 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 26, 1914

Linn, filed his motion and prayed a writ of mandamus in the district court of Grady county, h> require the defendants, the board of education of Ghickasha, a city of the first class, to recognize him as a member thereof. … The answer admits that the board had refused so to do, and further, that plaintiff was elected one of the five members thereof in 1913 to serve for two years, pursuant to Comp.

National Motor Club of Oklahoma, Inc. v. State Insurance Board

393 P.2d 511 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 23, 1964

In Love v. … In Arsenal Board of Trade v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, 166 Pa.

Roberts v. Board of Education

168 Okla. 414 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 15, 1934

State Election Board, 121 Okla. 119 , 248 P. 642 ; Board of Commissioners of Creek County v. Alexander, 58 Okla. 128 , 159 P. 311 . … Haskell v. Edmonds, 90 Okla. 44 , 215 P. 629 ; Brown v. Miller, 89 Okla. 287 , 215 P. 748 .

School Board of Cons. School Dist. No. 47 v. Monsey

198 Okla. 41 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 10, 1946

Board of Education v. Allen, 195 Okla. 209 , 156 P. 2d 596 . … Dowell v. Board of Education, 185 Okla. 342 , 91 P. 2d 771 . Since Senate Bill No. 5 does not require that the an *45 nexing district give its consent to the annexation, such consent is not required. Judgment affirmed.

Insurance Services Office v. State Board for Property & Casualty Rates

530 P.2d 1359 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 14, 1975

Co. v. State Ins. … Oliver v. Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, Okl., 359 P.2d 183 (1961), cited by the Board, is not in point.

Oklahoma Inspection Bureau v. State Board for Property & Casualty Rates

406 P.2d 458 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 28, 1965

This is a companion case to No. 41119, Oklahoma Inspection Bureau, et al. v. State Board for Property and Casualty Rates, in which an opinion was promulgated on this date. 406 P.2d 453 . … Our reasons' for this conclusion and the law sustaining the same are fully set forth in our opinion in No. 41119, Oklahoma Inspection Bureau v. State Board for Property and Casualty Rates, supra.

Mailath v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Board of Bar Examiners

752 P.2d 803 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 1, 1988

The Board allowed him to take the February 1987 examination but did not disclose the results. 10 . Cobb v. … Meinhard v. Salmon, supra note 15. 19 . See Konigsberg v.

Board of Com'rs of Tulsa County v. Colored Hospital Ass'n

181 Okla. 357 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 28, 1937

Nevertheless the ease is governed by the rules announced in the following eases: Board of Com’rs of Carter County v. Dowdy & Shivers, 133 Okla. 9 , 270 P. 836 ; Anadarko Funeral Home v. … In the case of Board of Garfield County v.

Grant County Excise Board v. Grant County Free Fair Ass'n

157 Okla. 300 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 24, 1932

J., CLARK, V. C. J., and RILEY, J., absent.

Board of Trustees of Town of Canton v. Gunning

191 Okla. 448 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 17, 1942

The rule is stated in Yale Theater Co. v. … In Stout v.

Baptist Health Care Corp. v. Okmulgee County Board of Equalization

750 P.2d 127 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 9, 1988

This question, too, is controlled by our opinion in Glass v. Oklahoma Methodist Home for the Aged, supra. … See, e.g., London Square Village, Inc. v. Okla. County Equalization and Excise Board, Okl., 559 P.2d 1224 (1976). This interpretation of 68 O.S.Supp.1987, § 2405, is also in harmony with our opinion in Glass, supra.

Gray v. Board of Education of Pawhuska Independent School District

389 P.2d 498 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 4, 1964

The Superintendent decided that the children’s school residence was in the Wynona District; and the Pawhuska School Board thereafter gave notice that they could be admitted to the Pawhuska schools for a new term, only upon … 1962, the minors, through their grandfather as their next friend, instituted the present action in the District Court (hereinafter referred to as the “trial court”) against the County Superintendent and the Pawhuska School Board

State ex rel. State Board of Medical Examiners v. Naifeh

598 P.2d 225 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 10, 1979

This Court is of the opinion that by virtue of 59 O.S.1971 § 513 and our holdings thereunder, Davis v. State Board of Medical Examiners, 181 Okl. 385 , 74 P.2d 610 (1937) and Choate v. … State, 204 Okl. 596 , 232 P.2d 634 (1951), all appeals from a decision of the Oklahoma Board of Medical Examiners lie exclusively to the Supreme Court of Oklahoma. LET THE WRIT ISSUE. LAVENDER, C. J., IRWIN, V. C.