Case law

Standish Pipe Line Co. v. Okmulgee County Excise Board

201 Okla. 207 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 15, 1949

ARNOLD, V. C. J. … of the need by such governing boards, without itemization and notice, casts upon the excise board the mandatory duty of making a levy for such purposes within the constitutional limitation of one (1) mill.

News-Dispatch Printing & Audit Co. v. Board of Com'rs

130 Okla. 152 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 22, 1927

A. 499 ; Board of County Commissioners v. Travelers Ins. Co., 128 Fed. 817 , 63 C. C. A. 467 ; Hirt v. City of Erie (Pa.) 49 Atl. 467 ; City of Mitchell v. Scmith, City Auditor (S. D.) 80 N. … W. 1077 ; Opinion of the Justices (Me.) 18 Atl. 291 ; Board of Com’rs Lake Co. v. Platt, 79 Fed. 567 , 25 C. C. A. 87 ; McQuillin, Municipal Corp. (1913 Ed.) sec. 2226, citing State ex rel. v.

Excise Board v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.

180 Okla. 626 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 29, 1937

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Court of Tax Review by the excise board of Blaine county, hereinafter referred to as protestee. … BAYLESS, V. C. J., and RILEY, PHELPS, and GIBSON, JJ., absent.

Staley v. Board of County Com'rs of Muskogee County

72 Okla. 147 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 11, 1919

Thereafter Staley duly presented bis claim for tbe full amount of tbe penalties authorized for making tbe arbitrary assessments to the board of county commissioners, which claim tbe board disallowed. … The matter was one in which the board was not concerned, and, though the agreement had been proved, it would have constituted no defense.

Board of County Com'rs of Garvin Co. v. Hamm

175 Okla. 443 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 7, 1936

In McEwen Manufacturing Co. v. … Plaintiff suggests that the statutory provisions herein under discussion and construed in McEwen Manufacturing Co. v.

Independent School District No. 4 v. State Board of Education

451 P.2d 684 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 4, 1969

Green v. Condren, 178 Okl. 236 , 62 P.2d 635 . … We adopt instead the equitable principle expounded in Greenup County Board of Education v. Savage, 256 Ky. 259 , 75 S.W.2d 768 .

Lemen v. Board of County Com'rs of Garfield County

194 Okla. 248 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 29, 1944

Vahlberg, 185 Okla. 28 , 89 P. 2d 962 , and Board of Com’rs of Seminole Co. v. City of Wewoka, 191 Okla. 142 , 127 P. *250 2d 826. … GIBSON, V. C. J., dissents.

Board of County Com'rs v. Carey, Lombard, Young & Co.

178 Okla. 13 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 20, 1936

In the case of Board of Commissioners of Garfield County v. … Board of County Com’rs v. Seawell, 3 Okla. 281 , 41 P. 592 ; Butler v. Board of County Com’rs, 57 Okla. 748 , 157 P. 912 ; Western Paint Co. v.

Excise Board of Kay County v. Chicago, R.I. P. Ry.

155 Okla. 34 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 2, 1932

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Court of Tax Review in favor of the protestant, Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company, and against the excise board of Kay county, Okla., involving appropriations and levies … made by the excise board of Kay county for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1931. *35 The parties hereto have stipulated and ■agreed that the decision of this court in cause No. 22128, Caddo County, Oklahoma, Company (this

State Ex Rel. v. Board of Com'rs of Pontotoc County

119 Okla. 215 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 14, 1926

Schilling v. … Gooch v. Drumright et al., 88 Okla. 244 , 212 Pac. 991 : “Counsel for the plaintiff contends that this question is settled in his favor in the case of State ex rel. Schilling v.

People's Nat. Bank v. Board of Com'rs of Kingfisher County

24 Okla. 145 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 13, 1909

In Gibbons v. *150 Mahon, 136 U. S. 557 , 10 Sup. Ct. 1058, 34 L. … Bryant v. Hawley, 7 Cal. App. xiii , 94 Pac. 850‘.

Board of Ed. v. Consolidated School Dist. No. 72

113 Okla. 216 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 8, 1925

This action was begun in the district court of Carter county, Okla., by consolidated school district No. 72, Carter county, Okla., against the board of education of the city of Wilson (school district No. 43 independent). … An appeal was taken to the board of county commissioners of Carter county, who affirmed the action of the county superintendent.

Excise Board of Marshall County v. School Dist. No. 34

156 Okla. 261 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 25, 1932

In the language of this court in Board of Education v. … Justice Lester in Simmons v. Stuckey, Co. Treas., 113 Okla. 200 , 241 P. 124 . In Board of Education of City of Guthrie v. Excise Board of Logan County, 86 Okla. 24 , 206 P. 517 , Mr.

Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad v. Board of County Commissioners

389 P.2d 476 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 4, 1964

We have expressly held it was applicable to a county in Board of Commissioners of Harmon County v. Keen, District Judge, 194 Okl. 593 , 153 P.2d 483 ; Hazlett v. … Board of Com’rs of Muskogee County et al., 168 Okl. 290 , 32 P.2d 940 ; Board of Commissioners of Stephens County v. Hancock, Adm’r, 96 Okl. 238 , 221 P. 429 . See also Whiteneck v.

Board of Education of City of Muskogee v. Valeur

71 Okla. 100 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 8, 1918

Valeur, who will be referred to as plaintiff, brought suit against the board of education of the city of Muskogee, who will be referred to as defendant, to recover the sum of $75 alleged to be due him as salary from August … It is admitted that plaintiff was employed by the board of education at a salary of $150 per month, and that on July 31st a resolution was adopted that his services be dispensed with on August 15th.

Fanning v. Board of Ed. of City of Tulsa

140 Okla. 252 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 10, 1929

In support of such argument, the plaintiff cites the case of Dove v. … Such rule is likewise set forth in Goldsmith v. City of Ardmore, 136 Okla. 201 , 277 Pac. 230 ; Simms v. Smith, 136 Okla. 144 , 276 Pac. 740 ; Teter v.

Bradford v. Brennan

15 Okla. 47 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 3, 1904

Brown and against the defendant, W. L. Bradford. From this judgment the defendant appeals. It appears from the record that no motion for a new trial was filed. … Mutual Life Insurance Co., 7 Okla., 285; Glasser v. Glasser, 13 Okla., 389 .) The judgment of the court below is therefore affirmed. All the -Justices concurring.

Board of Trustees of Firemen's Relief & Pension Fund v. Cotton

208 Okla. 421 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 7, 1953

See In re Gruber 89 Okla. 148 , 214 P. 690 ; Firemen’s Relief and Pension Board, of City of Holdenville, v. Lucas, 189 Okla. 328 , 117 P. 2d 112 . … Wilcox Oil & Gas Co. v. Walker, 168 Okla. 543 , 35 P. 2d 269 ; Board of County Com’rs of Carter County v. Dorough, 177 Okla. 346 , 59 P. 2d 273 ; Marland, Gov., v. Hoffman, 184 Okla. 591 , 89 P. 2d 287 .

White v. Board of County Com'rs of Tulsa County

267 P.2d 579 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 9, 1954

As applicable to the question of the construction of the statutes .here .involved the plaintiffs cite, a rule stated in-the case of Gardner v. School Dist. … J., JOHNSON, V. C. J., and CORN, DAVISON, O’NEAL and BLACKBIRD, JJ., concur. WILLIAMS, J., dissents.

Board of Com'rs of Craig County v. Germo Mfg. Co.

71 Okla. 237 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 10, 1918

Kingfisher County v. Graham, 40 Okla. 571 , 139 Pac. 1149 . In Commissioners, etc., v. Stoddard, 13 Kan. 208 , the district judge directed the sheriff to buy certain matting for the courtroom. … The board of county commissioners disallowed the claim, and the claimant appealed to the district court, where judgment was giv-in his favor.