Case law

Strong v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement Board

76 O.B.A.J. 1399 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 21, 2005

McCarty, 76 Idaho 153 , 279 P.2d 879 -80 (1955); Board of Control of the Employees' Retirement Sys. of Alabama v. Had-den, 854 So.2d 1165, 1169 (Ala.Civ.App.2002); City of Oakland v. … Board of Trustees of the Police & Firemen's Retirement Sys., 340 N.J.Super. 473 , 774 A.2d 680, 688-89 (2001); Wallace v.

Board of County Com'rs of Garvin Co. v. Hamm

175 Okla. 443 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 7, 1936

In McEwen Manufacturing Co. v. … Plaintiff suggests that the statutory provisions herein under discussion and construed in McEwen Manufacturing Co. v.

Independent School District No. 4 v. State Board of Education

451 P.2d 684 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 4, 1969

Green v. Condren, 178 Okl. 236 , 62 P.2d 635 . … We adopt instead the equitable principle expounded in Greenup County Board of Education v. Savage, 256 Ky. 259 , 75 S.W.2d 768 .

State Ex Rel. Board of Com'rs v. Oklahoma Tax Commission

191 Okla. 155 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 30, 1942

J. 1521; Board of Education v. Commissioners, 137 N. C. 310 , 49 S. E. 353 ; State v. Osborne, 195 S. C. 295, 11 S. E. 2d 260, 266 ; Collins v. Humphrey, 181 Ark. 609 , 27 S. W. 2d 102 ; State v. … CORN, V. C. J., concurs in result. RILEY, GIBSON, and DAVISON, JJ., dissent.

Mid-Continent Pipe Line Co. v. Seminole County Excise Board

194 Okla. 40 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 15, 1944

Standish Pipe Line Co. et al. v. Oklahoma County Excise Board, 187 Okla. 245 , 102 P. 2d 606 ; Sinclair Prairie Pipe Line Co. v. Excise Board of Tulsa Co., 173 Okla. 375 , 49 P. 2d 114 ; Faught v. … In Excise Board of LeFlore County v. Kansas City Southern Ry.

Lemen v. Board of County Com'rs of Garfield County

194 Okla. 248 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 29, 1944

Vahlberg, 185 Okla. 28 , 89 P. 2d 962 , and Board of Com’rs of Seminole Co. v. City of Wewoka, 191 Okla. 142 , 127 P. *250 2d 826. … GIBSON, V. C. J., dissents.

Barnett v. Board of Education

179 Okla. 288 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 2, 1937

After thp claim was filed, the board of education realized $14,868.20 on the assets so held as security for the deposit, leaving a 'balance due the board of $771.09. … J. 750; Chemical National Bank v. Armstrong, supra; Merrill v. National Bank, supra; L. R.

Neel v. Board of Cty. Com'rs of Cherokee Cty.

617 P.2d 201 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 9, 1980

The act of the Excise Board appropriating highway funds to pay the salaries of the Board of County Commissioners is thereby held invalid. … The case of Federal Corporation v.

Raburn v. Board of County Com'rs of McIntosh County

168 Okla. 4 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 10, 1934

CULLISON, V. C. J. Henry H. … HI, or IV; and shall be exempt from all taxation. * * *” The United States statute just quoted was passed upon very recently by the United States Supreme Court, in the case of Trotter, G’dn, v. State of Tennessee, 78 L.

Maryland Casualty Co. v. Board of Com'rs of Okmulgee County

128 Okla. 58 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 14, 1926

Kuchler v. Weaver, 23 Okla. 420 , 100 Pac. 915 ; Union Savings Assoc. v. Burns, 74 Okla. 1 , 176 Pac. 227 ; Priddy v. Thompson, 204 Fed. 955 , 123 C. C. A. 277 ; Citizens State Bank v. … It was said by this court in the case of Beams v.

Standish Pipe Line Co. v. Oklahoma County Excise Board

187 Okla. 245 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 7, 1940

Allen v. City of Oklahoma City. … Excise Board, 168 Okla. 408 , 33 P. 2d 493 ; County Excise Board v. Gulf Pipe Line Co., 156 Okla. 103 , 9 P. 2d 460 .

Okmulgee County, Excise Board v. Consolidated Pipe Line Co.

189 Okla. 80 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 27, 1941

Co. v. Johnson, County Treas., 85 Okla. 161 , 204 P. 910 ; Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. McCurdy, County Treas., 86 Okla. 148 , 207 P. 321 ; Protest of Bledsoe, 161 Okla. 227 , 17 P. 2d 979 . … The taxing officials cite Excise Board of Woodward County v. Reid, 143 Okla. 204 , 288 P. 458 , and City of Yale v.

Excise Board of Cheek County v. Gulf Pipe Line Co.

156 Okla. 103 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 22, 1931

The actions were based upon the warrants thus issued and not upon an alleged contract based upon claims filed and disallowed by the board. In Faught v. … In Pettis v.

General Insurance Co. of America v. State Insurance Board

189 Okla. 524 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 21, 1941

The board relies largely on General Insurance Co. v. Ham, 49 Wyo. 525 , 57 P. 2d 671 . On the other hand, appellant largely relies on American Druggists’ Fire Insurance Co. v. … Associated Industries of Oklahoma v. State Insurance Board, 173 Okla. 41 , 46 P. 2d 361 .

STATE EX REL. BOARD OF EXAMINERS IN OPTOMETRY v. Lawton

523 P.2d 1064 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 11, 1974

We agree with the Colorado court which, after citing numerous authorities from various jurisdictions, in Colorado State Board of Optometric Examiners v. … Lawton under Senate Bill 173 the Board would bear the burden of proving that inducement does not in fact occur by his proximity to Lee Optical.” The Board relies on Williamson v.

Board of Ed. v. Consolidated School Dist. No. 72

113 Okla. 216 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 8, 1925

This action was begun in the district court of Carter county, Okla., by consolidated school district No. 72, Carter county, Okla., against the board of education of the city of Wilson (school district No. 43 independent). … An appeal was taken to the board of county commissioners of Carter county, who affirmed the action of the county superintendent.

School Dist. No. 160, Caddo County v. Alcott

31 Okla. 122 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 9, 1912

Brown v. Parker, 2 Okla. 258 , 39 Pac. 567 . After diligent search we have been unable' to find any statute, state or federal, upon which the contentions of either party can be sustained. … Brown v. Parker, supra; Winfield Town Co. v. Maris et al., 11 Kan. 128 . It also follows that the school district is not and cannot be interested in the lots in question, and cannot, therefore, maintain this action.

Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma v. Baker

638 P.2d 464 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 22, 1981

In Board of Regents of Higher Education v. … Regents of Univ. of Neb. v.

Tulsa County Excise Board v. Texas-Empire Pipe Line Co.

180 Okla. 287 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 18, 1937

Co. v. Excise Board of Washington County, 168 Okla. 619 , 35 P. (2d) 274 . … Co. v. Excise Board of Washington County, 168 Okla. 619 , 35 P. (2d) 274 . School district No. 26 had a valuation less than fifty million dollars. It had a town within its bounds, but no levy w'as made for the town.

Phillips v. Ladd

399 P.2d 501 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 9, 1965

See Brown v. Brown, Okl., . 365 P.2d 385 . … Therefore, under the rule followed in Brown v. Brown, supra, this feature of the trial will not be •considered.