Case law

Brown v. March

111 Okla. 288 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 21, 1925

As was said in Allred v. Smith, 135 N. C. 443 : “No one can be bound by or take advantage of the estoppel of another who does not succeed or hold subordinately to his position.’’ In Butler v. … As is said in Bigelow on Estoppel, page 142, approved in Seymour v.

Brown v. Goulding

55 Okla. 320 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 8, 1916

Brown defaulted. There was trial to a jury upon the issues presented by the answer of E. M. Brown, resulting in a verdict for defendant. … (Bennett v. Kiowa County Bank, 44 Okla. 575 , 145 Pac. 807 .) The judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. By the Court: It is so ordered.

Sims v. Brown

46 Okla. 767 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 25, 1915

Laws 1910), void as to said Brown. In the case of Miller v. Fryer, 35 Okla. 145 , 128 Pac. 713 . … The Supreme Court of the United States, in McDougal v. McKay et al., 237 U. S. 372 , 35 Sup. Ct. 605, 59 L. Ed. —, Pigeon et al. v. Buck et al., and Roberts v. Underwood et al., 237 U. S. 386 , 35 Sup. Ct. 608, 59 L.

Livingston v. Brown

100 Okla. 17 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 18, 1924

Bishop on Contracts, page 50, section 116; Campbell v. Rotaring, 42 Minn. 115 , 43 N. W. 795 , 12 L. R. A. 278; Dair v. U. S. 16 Wall. 1 , 21 L. Ed. 492 ; Bishop on Contracts, sections 382, 383. … Selsor v. Arnbrecht, 57 Okla. 732 , 157 Pac. 908 ; First Natl. Bank of Addington v. Shell, 57 Okla. 425 , 157 Pac. 317 .

Brown v. Goldsmith

437 P.2d 247 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 23, 1968

Wilson v. Crutcher, 176 Okl. 481 , 56 P.2d 416 ; Lorimer v. Julius Knack Coal Co., 246 Mich. 214 , 224 N.W. 362 , 64 A.L.R. 210 . … Greene v. Anderson, 102 Ky. 216 , 43 S.W. 195 ; Maresh v. Jennings, Tex.Civ.App., 38 S.W.2d 406 . The court in Reel v.

Brown v. Peck

335 P.2d 907 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 17, 1959

court in *910 the case of Jent v. … Dowell v. McNeill, Okl., 285 P.2d 856, 859 ; Little v. Echols, Okl., 269 P.2d 984 .

Brown v. State

178 Okla. 506 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 14, 1936

See Abernathy, Agt., et al. v. Huston, Co. Treas., 166 Okla. 184 , 26 P. (2d) 939 . … J„ OSBORN, V. O. J., and RILET and GIBSON, JJ., concur.

Brown v. Giblet

161 Okla. 262 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 24, 1933

Co. v. Weaver, 67 Okla. 293 , 171 P. 34 ; City National Bank v. Coatney, 122 Okla. 233 , 253 P. 481 .

Jones v. Brown

516 P.2d 546 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 31, 1973

Hiner v. Hugh Breeding, Inc., Okl., 355 P.2d 549 (1960). See also Gulf Oil Company v. Woodson, Okl., 505 P.2d 484, 489 (1972). … Brown, District Judge of Cleveland County is granted and he is prohibited from undertaking further proceedings in the action now pending in his court. DAVISON, C. J., WILLIAMS, V. C.

Webb v. Brown

195 Okla. 256 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 20, 1945

Willie Webb et al., describing themselves respectively as trustees and officers of the Antioch Baptist Church, an unincorporated religious association, filed action against Vada Brown, Pearl Gentry, and Henry Langston, describing … Under Elliott v.

McCleary v. Brown

190 Okla. 19 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 2, 1941

Prince v. Gosnell, 47 Okla. 570 , 149 P. 1162 ; McIntosh v. Board of Com’rs, 179 Okla. 610 , 67 P. 2d 10 . … Continental Insurance Co. v. Portwood, 184 Okla. 22 , 84 P. 2d 435 ; Ketcham v. Oil Field Supply Co., 99 Okla. 201 , 226 P. 93 ; Farris v. Commercial Union Fire Ins. Co., 176 Okla. 331 , 55 P. 2d 432 .

Brown v. Turner

201 Okla. 570 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 28, 1949

time plaintiff obtained a divorce from Cora Brown; that thereafter Cora Brown moved to Chicago. … Co. v. Stupart, 152 Okla. 144 , 4 P. 2d 77 ; Russell v. Key, 195 Okla. 49 , 155 P. 2d 238 ; Cooper v. Kiester, 199 Okla. 238 , 185 P. 2d 458 .

Carney v. Brown

110 Okla. 165 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 2, 1925

Brown, defendant in error, defendant below, to -remove H. R. Brown as guardian of Walton Carney, an incompetent. The parties will be referred to as plaintiffs and defendant as they appeared in the lower court. … Blasdell et al. v. Gower, 70 Okla. 178 , 173 Pac. 644 ; Cromwell v. Hamilton, 89 Okla. 225 , 214 Pac. 694 ; West v. Oakey, 84 Okla. 59 , 202 Pac. 318 ; Okla., K. & M. Ry. Co. v.

Brown v. Magers

359 P.2d 321 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 31, 1961

McClure, to sue as a co-partner in Brown-McClure Lumber Company. … He purchased the materials from Brown-McClure Lumber Company on invoices bearing both its name and the names of Roy Brown and Melvin McClure.

Brown v. Holden

410 P.2d 528 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 19, 1965

See also Tiger v. Sellers, 10 Cir., 145 F.2d 920 ; Conservative Loan Co. v. Sarkey, 92 Okl. 257 , 219 P. 107 . And in Wood & Co. v. … Co. v.

Brown v. Nichols

117 Okla. 233 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 27, 1925

Brown for $2,160 for fraud. … Association v. Lloyd, 97 Okla. 39 , 222 Pac. 544 ; Hornstein v. Yarrington, 110 Okla. 175 , 237 Pac. 73 .

Brown v. Thompson

73 Okla. 238 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 29, 1918

In the case of Alexander et al. v. Brown, 1 Pet. 683 , 7 L. Ed. 680 , the question of the sufficiency of a notice was before the Supreme Court of the United States for consideration. … Estate of Toady Standwaitie, 73 Okla. 255 , 175 Pac. 542 ; King v. Gunnison, 5 Pa. St. 171; Lewark v. Carter, 117 Ind. 206 , 20 N. E. 119 , 3 L. R. A. 440, 10 Am. St. Rep. 40 ; Stonerock v. Wisner, L. R.

Brown v. Minshall

83 Okla. 98 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 13, 1921

Smith v. Williams et al., 78 Okla. 297 , 190 Pac. 555 ; Patterson et al. v. Carter, 83 Okla. 70 , 200 Pac. 855 ; Starr v. Long Jim. 227 U. S. 613 , 57 L. Ed. 670 ; U. S. v. Hemmer (D. C.) 195 Fed. 790 ; Goodrum v. … Franklyn v. Lynch, 233 U. S. 269 , 58 L. Ed. 954 , affirming 37 Okla. 60 ; Mullen v. Pickens, 250 U. S. 590 , 63 L. Ed. 1158 ; Whitmire v. Levine, 80 Okla. 21 , 193 Pac. 884 . In the case Bank of America v.

Hendrickson v. Brown

11 Okla. 41 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 6, 1901

That as consideration for said real estate he paid said Brown the sum of twelve hundred ($1,200) dollars cash, and endorsed and delivered to Brown two promissory notes executed by one Samuel 0. … In Martin v.

Hummell v. Brown

93 Okla. 256 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 20, 1923

Brown, for a good and valuable consideration, purchased said notes and mortgage, prior to June 6, 1919, which was before any of said notes secured by said mortgage had become due; that the plaintiff herein has made due demand … Brown.” All the others of the series bear the following indorsement: “5-21-19. Pay to the order of E. M. Brown. Charles P. Yadon.”