Case law

Fishman Realty Inv. Co. v. Board of Trustees, Etc.

149 Okla. 293 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 16, 1931

City National Bank v. Coatney, 122 Okla. 233 , 253 Pac. 481 .

City of Tulsa v. Oklahoma State Pension & Retirement Board

674 P.2d 10 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 12, 1983

In City of Wilburton v. … In Oklahoma Railway Co. v.

Board of Com'rs v. Woodford Consolidated School Dist. No. 36

165 Okla. 227 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 28, 1933

Board of Education, 113 Okla. 217 , 242 P. 173 ; Chandler. Co. Supt., v. Barber, 113 Okla. 222 , 241 P. 145 ; Weathers v. Liebhart, 129 Okla. 185 , 263 P. 1108 ; School Dist. No. 9 v. … If the statute as construed by this court in Board of County Com’rs of Garfield County v.

Brusha Et Ux. v. Board of Education of Oklahoma City

41 Okla. 595 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 4, 1913

Co. v. Swinney, 38 Iowa, 182 ; Ottumwa, etc., R. *600 Co. v. McWilliams, 71 Iowa, 164 , 32 N. W. 315 ; Randall v. Texas Cen. R. Co., 63 Tex. 586 . … Kanaga v. Railroad, 76 Mo. 207 ; Provolt v. Railroad, 57 Mo. 257 ; Masterson v. Railroad, 72 Mo. 343 ; [Reichert v. St. L. & S. F. R. Co., 51 Ark. 491 , 11 S. W. 696 ] 5 L. R. A. 183, and trotes.

Board of Com'rs of Seminole County v. State Ex Rel.

31 Okla. 196 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 9, 1912

Mobile Mutual Insurance Co. v. Cleveland, 76 Ala. 321 . … Tilden v. Sacramento County, 41 Cal. 68 ; State ex rel. Johnston v. Lutz et al., 136 Mo. 633 , 38 S. W. 323 ; Harwood v. Quinby, 44 Iowa, 385 . The judgment of the lower court is affirmed. All the Justices concur.

Butler v. Board of Governors of the Registered Dentists

619 P.2d 1262 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 28, 1980

These same arguments were made against The Board of Governors of Registered Dentists in a case recently decided by this Court, Berry v. Board of Governors of Registered Dentists of Oklahoma, 611 P.2d 628 (Okl.1980). … The same argument was made in Berry v. Board of Governors of Registered Dentists, supra.

Board of County Com'rs of Carter County v. Reirdon

172 Okla. 312 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 2, 1935

Of such a tax the Supreme Court of the United States in Citizens Savings & Loan Association v. Topeka, 22 L.

Board of Com'rs of Le Flore County v. Lucas

146 Okla. 8 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 11, 1930

Russell v. Hyer, supra. … Co. v. Green, 133 Okla. 58 , 270 Pac. 1111 ; First Nat Bank v. O’Bannon, 128 Okla, 16, 260 Pac. 1062 ; Morris v. West Pub. Co., 118 Okla. 237 , 247 Pac. 52 ; Town v. Crawford, 106 Okla. 254 , 234 Pac. 208 .

Guthrie Gas, Light, Fuel & Improvement Co. v. Board of Education

64 Okla. 157 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 15, 1917

In September, 1909, the Guthrie Light, Gas, Fuel & Improvement Company and the board of education of the city of Guthrie entered into a contract under which the board of education installed a system for -heating by natural … Co. v. Siegel Cooper Co., supra; Superior v. Douglas Co. Tel. Co., 141 Was. 363, 122 N. W. 1023 ; Belfast v. Belfast Water Co., supra; Hays v. Pennsylvania Co. (C. O.) 12 Fed. 309 ; U. S. v. Chicago & N. W. R.

Board of Ed. of City of Oilton v. Short

126 Okla. 70 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 21, 1926

Board of Education v. West, 29 Okla. 503 , 118 Pac. 146 , and In re Application of State to Issue Bonds to Fund Indebtedness, 33 Okla. 797 , 127 Pac. 1065 (and cases therein cited). … It is suggested by counsel in their briefs that the trial court in refusing to grant the writ was controlled by the decision of this court in Eaton, County Treasurer, v. St.

Board of Com'rs of Carter County v. Dowdy & Shivers

133 Okla. 9 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 2, 1928

Board of County Com’rs v. Brett, 32 Okla. 853 , 124 Pac. 57 ; Anderson v. Board of County Com'rs, 44 Okla. 164 , 143 Pac. 1145 ; Board of County Com’rs v. Whitney, 73 Okla. 160 , 175 Pac. 112 ; Board of County Com’rs v. … In the cas'e of Anderson v.

Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. Savage

32 Okla. 376 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 19, 1912

Wigmore, in his work on Evidence (vol. 4, sec. 2572), says: “The ordinances and regulation of local boards and councils are not noticed” —citing Moore v. Mayor, 107 Ga. 704 , 33 S. E. 435 ; Watt v. … Co. v. Davis & Young, 26 Okla. 359 , 109 Pac. 551 , and followed in A., T. & S. P. Ry. Co. v. Ward, ante, 120 Pac. 982, and in St. L. & S. F. R. Co. v. Brown, supra. In the Davis & Young case, supra, Mr.

Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co. v. State Board of Equalization

170 Okla. 516 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 12, 1935

Brady, 42 Okla. 807 , 143 P. 6 ; Huckins Hotel Co. v. Board of County Com’rs, 64 Okla. 235 , 166 P. 1043 . In Thompson v. Brady, supra, the court had under consideration sections 7368, 7369, 7370, Rev. … Consolidated School District, 79 Okla. 115 , 191 P. 737 ; Brown v. Holloway's Estate (Colo.) 108 P. 25 ; In re Sharp (Idaho) 96 P. 563 , 18 L. R. A. (N. S.) 886; State v. District Court (Mont.) 99 P. 139 : Garcia v.

BOARD OF COUNTY COMM'RS OF TULSA COUNTY v. Morgan

324 P.2d 268 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 8, 1958

In the early case of Board of Com’rs of Logan County v. … Oklahoma County v. Queen City Lodge No. 197, I.O.O.F., 195 Okl. 131 , 156 P.2d 340 ; Board of Co. Com’rs Muskogee County v. Fink, 45 Okl. 121 , 145 P. 413 .

Hubbard v. Board of Trustees of the Police Pension

322 P.2d 207 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 26, 1957

Hubbard, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, who sought the issuance of a writ of mandamus to compel the Board of Trustees of the Police Pension and Retirement System of the City of Tulsa, Oklahoma, hereinafter referred … Co. v. Parks, 182 Okl. 598 , 78 P.2d 791 ; Tobly v. Dekinder, 85 Okl. 288 , 206 P. 201 . .Appeal dismissed. . WELCH, C. J., and HALLEY, JOHNSON, BLACKBIRD, ’ JACKSON and CARLILE, JJ., concur. CORN, V. C. J., dissents.

Board of Trustees of Firemen's Relief & Pension Fund v. Naughton

197 Okla. 592 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 15, 1946

Clark, who are widows of deceased members of the Fire Department of the City of Tulsa, brought their separate actions in mandamus against the Board of Trustees of the Firemen’s Relief and Pension Fund of the City of Tulsa … Franklin v. Sovereign Camp W.O.W., 145 Okla. 159 , 291 P. 513 ; State v. Ward, 189 Okla. 532 , 118 P. 2d 216 .

Board of Com'rs of Kiowa County v. Kiowa Nat. Bank

141 Okla. 271 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 17, 1929

L. 1925; Blather v. City and County of San Francisco, 115 Fed. 37 , 52 C. C. A. 631 ; County of Cass v. Johnston, 95 U. S. 3601 , 24 L. Ed. 419 ; Davenport v. County of Dodge, 105 U. S. 237 , 26 L. Ed. 1018 ; Jordan v. … Russell v. Harrison, 33 Okla. 225 , 124 Pac. 762 ; Jordan v. Davis, 10! Okla. 329, 61 Pac. 1063 .

Dolese Bros. Co. v. Board of Com'rs of Comanche Cty.

151 Okla. 110 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 28, 1931

To the same effect is the case of Central Light & Fuel Co. v. State Board of Equalization, 51 Okla. 407 , 151 Pac. 1170 . … In the case of Hays v.

Board of Comrs. of Roger Mills Co. v. Sauer

8 Okla. 409 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 25, 1899

The case comes clearly within the rule laid down in the case of Board v.

Kline v. State ex rel. Oklahoma Water Resources Board

646 P.2d 1258 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 22, 1981

Bureau, supra, at 456, quoting from Saginaw Broadcasting Co. v. Fed. C. Com’n, 68 App.D.C. 282 , 96 F.2d 554, 559 (U.S.Ct.App.D.C.1938) Cert. Denied as Gross v. … Brown v. Banking Board, 512 P.2d 166 (Okl.1973).