Case law

Smith v. Board of County Com'rs of Oklahoma County

201 Okla. 652 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 22, 1949

In Board of County Commissioners of Osage County et al. v. … Under the rules stated, the Board of County Commissioner of Osage County v.

Board of Education v. Territory of Oklahoma

12 Okla. 286 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 4, 1902

(State v. Metschau, 46 Pac. … (Craft v. Jackson, 5 Kan. 518 ; Bobbett v. State, 10 Kan. 9 ; Bartlett v. State, 13 Kan. 99 ; State v. Faulkner, 20 Kan. 541 ; State v. Marion Co., 21 Kan. 420 ; Hornaday v. State, 62 Pac. Rep. 329 .)

Levy Bros. v. Board of Com'rs of Adair County

159 Okla. 98 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 1, 1932

Co. v. … In the case of Meriwether v.

Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. v. Board of Ed.

158 Okla. 274 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 10, 1932

In School District No. 2 v. Gossett, Co. … Under the rule stated in Board of Education of Town of Owasso v. Short, Atty. Gen., 89 Okla. 2 , 213 P. 857 , and St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co. v. Hendrickson, Co. Treas., 128 Okla. 266 , 263 P. 148 , the bonds!

Board of Governors of the Registered Dentists v. Burk

551 P.2d 1122 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 1, 1976

This entrapment question was involved in Crosbie v. … Under the prior act, we had occasion to determine the same constitutional issue in Thrasher v. Board of Governors, Okl., 359 P.2d 717 (1961).

Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Oklahoma State Board of Equalization

231 P.3d 638 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 29, 2009

In its assessments of Southwestern Bell for 2005, 2006 and 2007, the State Board of Equalization subtracted only the value of the intangible property set forth in Okla. Const. art. 10, § 6A. … See Austin, Nichols & Co. v. Oklahoma County Board of Tax-Roll Corrections, 1978 OK 65 , 578 P.2d 1200 .

Cunningham v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Planning & Resources Board

277 P.2d 990 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 14, 1954

See also annotation in 8 A.L.R. 472 , and Delfeld v. City of Tulsa, 191 Okl. 541 , 131 P.2d 754 , 143 A.L.R. 1032 . … Grand River Dam Authority v. Thompson, 189 Okl. 89 , 113 P.2d 818 . Affirmed.

State ex rel. Board of Regents v. McCloskey Brothers, Inc.

227 P.3d 133 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 8, 2009

Board of County Com'rs of Creek County v. Casteel, 1974 OK 31, ¶ 15 , 522 P.2d 608 . … Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Mourer, see note 43 at ¶ 4, supra (appointee to board of equalization); State ex rel. Blankenship v.

Oliver v. State Ex Rel. State Board of Medical Examiners

122 Okla. 66 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 23, 1926

Thereafter, said board heard the complaint and evidence was introduced, after which the board found against the respondent and ordered that his license as a physician be revoked. … Within three days thereafter, the respondent filed his petition in the superior court of Pottawatomie county, where one of the members of said board resided, and the court issued its writ of certiorari and ordered said board

Lone Star Gas Co. v. Bryan County Excise Board

193 Okla. 13 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 8, 1943

Kurn, 184 Okla. 96 , 85 P. 2d 291 ; 68 Of S. 1941 § 289), (b) by issuing bonds for such purpose (Board of Education v. … v.

National Surety Co. v. State Ex Rel. Board of Com'rs

111 Okla. 180 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 5, 1925

Schilling v. Oklahoma City et al., 67 Okla. 18 , 168 Pac. 227 ; State ex rel. Morrison v. … Atty., et al. v. Woolsey et al., 35 Okla. 545 , 130 Pac. 934 ; Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. State ex rel. Gleason, Co. Atty., 52 Okla. 614 , 153 Pac. 625 ).

State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Planning & Resources Board v. Smith

317 P.2d 219 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 29, 1957

Oklahoma Planning and Resources Board, hereinafter referred to-as plaintiff, to quiet title to 240 acres of land in Latimer County, Oklahoma, as against Otto Smith and Russell Austin,, hereinafter referred to as defendants … 5, 1938, conveyed the same to said State of Oklahoma for park purposes; that such gift and deed evidencing the same were duly accepted by the State of Oklahoma, acting by and through the Oklahoma Planning and Resources Board

State ex rel. Chapel v. State Board of Education

200 Okla. 610 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 16, 1948

In Board of Education of City of Ardmore v. … In the case of Board of Education of Oklahoma City v.

Butler v. Board of County Com'rs of Muskogee Cty.

413 P.2d 552 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 12, 1966

The duties of the board in this regard are judicial in nature. Board of Commissioners of Cherokee County v. Hatfield, 121 Okl. 28 , 247 P. 77 . … Wails v. Board of County Commissioners of Okmulgee County, supra; State ex rel. Hopkins v. Tindell, 112 Kan. 256 , 210 P. 619 . In State ex rel. Hopkins v.

Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Grim

184 Okla. 275 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 25, 1938

See Shuler v. Viger (1926) 123 Okla. 110 , 252 P. 18 , and McCall v. Monarch Royalty Corporation (1937) 179 Okla. 213 , 64 P.2d 871 . … City of Hobart v. Dailey (1934) 170 Okla. 107 , 39 P.2d 44 .

Baker v. Board of County Commissioners of Stephens County

439 P.2d 946 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 26, 1968

In Butler v. Board of County Com’rs of Muskogee County, Okl., 413 P.2d 552 , the Board re-districted the county and placed a portion of the City of Muskogee in each district. … Gen. v.

Bailey v. Uhls

503 P.2d 877 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 21, 1972

Twist et al. v. Kay (1967), Okl., 434 P.2d 180, 186 ; Brown, Building Superintendent v. Fraser (1970), Okl., 467 P.2d 464, 469 . … Under Board of Adjustment of Oklahoma City et al. v.

EOG Resources Marketing, Inc. v. Oklahoma State Board of Equalization

196 P.3d 511 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 24, 2008

See Liddell v. Heavner, 2008 OK 6, ¶ 8 , 180 P.3d 1191 ; Home-Stake Prod. Co. v. Board of Equalization of Seminole County, 1966 OK 115, ¶ 16 , 416 P.2d 917 . 4 . Okla. … Allegheny Pittsburgh Coal Co. v. County Comm'n of Webster County, W. Va., 488 U.S. 336, 344 , 109 S.Ct. 633 , 102 L.Ed.2d 688 (1989); Brown-Forman Co. v.

Board of Regents of University of Oklahoma v. Childers

197 Okla. 350 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 9, 1946

App.) 185 S.W. 921 ), and related corporations (Kelley v. Heitman, 220 Ind. 625 , 44 N.E. 2d 981 ), it means identical with or an equal part. … It clearly falls within the scope of the function of that board and the institution of higher education it operates.

Garrett v. Board of County Com'rs of Caddo County

203 Okla. 487 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 17, 1950

ARNOLD, V. C. J.