Case law

WOOD v. MERCEDES-BENZ OF OKLAHOMA CITY

336 P.3d 457 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 16, 2014

This has been the common law approach ever since landlord's sovereignty and immunity for acts done within the boundaries of his land gradually gave away to present-day civil accountability. … Melvin Simon & Assoc., Inc., 1994 OK 68, ¶ 6 , 876 P.2d 239 ("It is well established that a landowner has no duty to warn of dangers that are open and obvious."); Turner v.

In Re Amendment of Title 20, Chapter 20, Appendix 1

271 P.3d 776 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 17, 2009

furnished written materials which meet the requirements set forth above. $) Approval for credit may be granted for computer-based or other technology-based continuing education programs which otherwise meet the criteria established … Any evidence offered on behalf of the complainant or the court reporter respondent shall be received and considered unless clearly irrelevant to the proceedings.

Johnson v. Hillcrest Health Center, Inc.

74 O.B.A.J. 655 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 18, 2003

to establish the cause of an objective injury where there is other competent evidence to establish the cause with reasonable certainty.]; See, Strubhart v. … Porter is clearly distinguishable from the present cause on its facts.

IN RE: INITIATIVE PETITION No. 426 STATE QUESTION No. 810

2020 OK 43 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 27, 2020

Reallocation of inmates to their home address is not clearly or manifestly unconstitutional. … No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor

Adair v. Clay

780 P.2d 650 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 29, 1989

If such revaluation proceeds through the several classes of property in the same order as the last, all property will be valued every five years and it does not matter where the process begins, but § 2481.1 clearly provides … As we stated in Melvin, 607 P.2d at 697 : “[E]qual treatment is established by regular, cyclical revaluation.

Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Cozart

59 Okla. 136 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 13, 1916

The evidence further established that the plaintiff had made some inquiry in regard to whether or not the wheat had been weighed in transit; but it clearly appeared from the evidence that, very shortly after the receipt of … ) to the Interstate Commerce Act (Act Feb. 4, 1887, c. 104, sec. 20, 24 Stat. 383 ), with relation to this provision: ■ “The liability imposed by the Carmack Amendment is that of the common law, and it may be limited or qualified

Strelecki v. Oklahoma Tax Commission

872 P.2d 910 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 23, 1994

Supreme Court struck it as invalid, holding the state tax statute violative both of § 111 and of the constitutional doctrine of intergovernmental tax immunity embodied in the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. … Barker holds that a state violates intergovernmental tax immunity and 4 U.S.C. § 111 when it taxes the benefits received from the United States by military retirees but does not tax the benefits received by retired state

METCALF v. METCALF

465 P.3d 1187 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 14, 2020

In Larman , the lender required that in order to qualify, both spouses had to be record owners and sign the loan related documents. … Clearly, this appeal was not frivolous or without merit because the trial court is reversed.

Burke v. Donnermeyer

448 P.2d 446 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 17, 1968

Both pleadings contained qualified, general, denials, accompanied by special denials that said defendants made any false, or fraudulent, representations that were designed to, or did, induce plaintiffs to enter into their … We therefore hold that the judgment of the trial court is clearly against the weight of the evidence, and represents a misapplication of our statutes and previous decisions to the preponderance thereof.

Isaacs v. Oklahoma City

437 P.2d 229 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 27, 1966

The same argument was made in connection with the establishment of the Oklahoma Turnpike Authority, and in that case, styled Application of Oklahoma Turnpike Authority, 203 Okl. 335 , 221 P.2d 795 , we likewise held that … Clearly, this is intended to apply to, but only to, suits involving the existence and/or powers and authority of such an Urban Renewal Authority, and to contemplate that with respect to those questions the Urban Renewal Authority

Beasley v. Bond

173 Okla. 355 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 11, 1935

which should be deduced therefrom, there becomes competent, as evidence, the opinion of one who, from study and experience, is an expert in such matters, and the refusal of the court to receive such proffered proof, when clearly … For that operation, there was evidence tending to establish that an inadequate force of hands was supplied.

Catlett v. Jordan

206 Okla. 473 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 26, 1952

Clearly, a joint adventure arose by reason of this fact situation. The rules applied above have been recognized by many courts of last resort and were applied in the case of Kasishke v. … All the stock in these companies, other than the qualifying shares issued to Baker, were issued to Kasish-ke and his wife. Moreover, all the stock issued to Mrs.

Conwill v. Eldridge

71 Okla. 223 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 10, 1918

Clearly, the action of the court in so doing was authorized by defendants’ answer, for it, in effect, admitted their execution. … The fourth paragraph of the syllabus reads: “Although the answer of defendants contained a general denial, this was qualified by other aillegali|i'On'/S therein contained, which admitted all the essential facts necessary

Midland Valley Railroad v. Watie

175 Okla. 402 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 18, 1935

O. title 45, secs. 51, 53, 54, and 56), establishing the rights, obligations, and liabilities of common carriers by railroad while engaged in interstate commerce for injuries received by their employees while employed by … The defendant argues: “The witness’ testimony shows clearly that he did not see the men walking with the fail and he was not qualified or competent to answer the question.

Andrew v. Depani-Sparkes

396 P.3d 210 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 16, 2017

Wedgewood Village, Inc. 32 The first statement is clearly incorrect based upon opinions since Culpepper which allow a party to invoke judicial discretion by a filing a motion to reconsider. … In the absence of evidence establishing the causation element of Plaintiffs’ prima facie case of medical negligence, evidence which must be proven through expert testimony, Plaintiffs cannot meet their burden of proof, and

Francis v. Branson

168 Okla. 24 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 27, 1933

utterances " contained in the so-called dissenting opinion, nor could he even make a fair and . true report of his dissenting opinion, if' moved by malice, for even the doing of that is the exercise of only a prima facie, qualified … He alleged that continuously (fact) from time to time (fact) going over the state, and especially in certain named counties (fact, although the fact might turn upon a necessity of reference to the provisions of law establishing

McMullan v. Enterprise Financial Group, Inc.

247 P.3d 1173 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 31, 2011

Clearly, the five elements of an insurance contract were present in the vehicle service contracts. 117 In Pugh v. … However, McMullan filed an amended petition on April 3, 2009, which clearly included the bad faith allegations. 3 .

IN THE MATTER OF THE REINSTATEMENT OF MCLAUGHLIN

2018 OK 41 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 15, 2018

Failure to establish any of these essential conditions necessitates denial of reinstatement. … The record clearly reflects that so long as McLaughlin maintains his sobriety, he is an excellent lawyer and law abiding citizen.

St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Hardy, District Judge

45 Okla. 423 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 26, 1915

But we *429 think the facts and opinions in these cases clearly distinguish them from the rule we have here announced and the authorities cited in support thereof. … This court judicially knows that respondent, Hardy, is no longer judge of the district court of Choctaw county, and that he is now one of the qualified and acting justices of this court, and the Hon. C. E.

OKLAHOMA GAS AND ELECTRIC CO. v. STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA CORP. COMMISSION

2025 OK 15 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 4, 2025

OG&E's successful proposal relied on the Large Load exception to RESCTA, which permits a supplier "extending its service" into another supplier's certified territory for qualifying large-load customers. … The record here does not clearly establish that the Commission had either a longstanding rule or a well-known de facto policy of permitting the disputed conduct.