Case law

Board of Comrs. of Roger Mills Co. v. Rowden

8 Okla. 406 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 25, 1899

.: This was an action brought in the district court of Roger Mills county on July 12, 1897, by Sat Rowden, defendant in error, against the board of commissioners of Roger Mills county, plaintiff in error, to *407 recover … This case comes clearly within the principle announced in the case of Board of Com’rs of Roger Mills Co. v.

Board of Com'rs of Muskogee County v. Fink

60 Okla. 67 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 8, 1916

Plaintiffs contend, on the authority' of New Jersey v. Wilson, supra, Choate v. Trapp, supra, and English v. … In New Jersey v.

Sebranek v. Board of Com'rs of Garfield County

166 Okla. 295 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 21, 1933

Under the provisions of section 1780, Statutes of Oklahoma, 1893, the board of county commissioners was required to keep a book for the entry of all proceedings relating to the establishment or change of roads. … Treas., v. Nelson, 142 Okla. 54 , 285 P. 100 ; Mills v. Glasscock, 26 Okla. 123 , 110 P. 377 . Eor the reasons stated, we find no error in the judgment of the trial court, and that judgment is in all things affirmed.

City of Ardmore v. Excise Board of Carter County

200 Okla. 516 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 29, 1948

City of Mangum v. Greer et al., 188 Okla. 504 , 111 P. 2d 178 , wherein essentially this same question was before us for decision. … City of McAlester v. Jones, 181 Okla. 77 , 72 P. 2d 371 ; Standard Company Dairy v. Allen, 188 Okla. 287 , 108 P. 2d 164 ; Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Walker, 195 Okla. 470 ; 158 P. 2d 268 .

Board of Com'rs of Noble County v. Niemann

182 Okla. 497 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 29, 1938

As said in the case of Board of County Commissioners of Tulsa County v. … In this connection we are cited to the case of Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County v.

PRICE v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF PAWNEE CO.

2016 OK 16 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 17, 2016

OSCN Found Document:PRICE v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF PAWNEE CO. … Town of Morris, supra, 150 P. at 686 . ¶10 Conversely, the Board cites Board of County Commissioners of the County of Seminole v.

Board of Com'rs of McIntosh County v. Whitaker

59 Okla. 232 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 27, 1916

Zeigler v. Board of County Commissioners, Grant County, 44 Okla. 266 , 144 Pac. 381 ; Orendorff v. Board of County Commissioners of Grant County. 44 Okla. 271 . 144 Pac. 383 ; Huntington et al. v. … Board of County Commissioners of Grant County, 44 Okla. 276 , 144 Pac. 385 ; Russell v. Board of County Commissioners of Grant County, 44 Okla. 301 , 144 Pac. 580 ; Board of County Commissioners of Washita County v.

Wilson v. Board of County Com'rs of Tillman County

64 Okla. 266 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 18, 1917

It was so held in Reddick v. … A well-considered case sq.uarely in point is Brown et al. v. Galena Mining & Smelting Co. et al., 32 Kan. 528 , 4 Pac. 1013 .

Kansas. O. & G. Ry. Co. v. Johnston

136 Okla. 301 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 19, 1929

Herndon v. Hammond, 28. Okla. 616, 115 Pac. 775 : State ex rel. Smith v. Brown, 24 Okla. 438 , 103 Pac. 762 ; Morrison v. Brown, 27 Okla. 201 , 109 Pac. 237 . … We hold the State Board of Equalization is not without jurisdiction to consider the matter before them. The writ of prohibition is denied. LESTER, V. O.

Adjustment Realty Co. v. Excise Board of Muskogee County

149 Okla. 70 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 10, 1931

The same contention was made and denied in Adjustment Realty Co. v. Excise Board of Muskogee County, 141 Okla. 130 , 284 Pac. 27 . … That contention was denied by this court in Adjustment Realty Co. v. Excise Board, supra, on the ground that it was not presented in the petition in error.

Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Jefferson County Excise Board

185 Okla. 84 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 9, 1939

WELCH, V. C. J. Joint School District No. 65 lies partly in Jefferson county and partly in Carter county, mostly in the latter county. … Its annual budget for operating expenses for the year 1938-89, as originally approved by the excise board of (tarter county, called for a levy of 17 mills.

Cole v. District Board of School Dist. No. 29

32 Okla. 692 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 9, 1912

They brought action to compel the district board to admit them. … In Gilliland v. Board of Education, 141 N. C. 482 , 54 S.

Board of County Com'rs v. Johnson Oil Refining Co.

167 Okla. 452 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 27, 1934

The judgments of this court were there reversed (Johnson Oil Refining Co. v. Oklahoma, 54 S. Ct. 152 , 78 L. … Travis v. Dickey, 96 Okla. 256 , 222 P. 527 ; Union Refrigerator Co. v. Lynch, 177 U. S. 149 .

Board of Adjustment of City of Tulsa v. Shore

207 Okla. 381 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 5, 1952

Construing this section of the Code we held in Luke, Ex’r, v. … (City of Tulsa v.

Board of Education of City of Clinton v. Houilston

51 Okla. 329 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 21, 1915

V.' … V. Gilliland, was present at this time.

Hale v. Board of County Commissioners of Seminole County

603 P.2d 761 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 27, 1979

If the proceeding is brought pursuant to a resolution of the board of county commissioners, it must be styled “The Board of County Commissioners of_Co. v._” [Smith v. … Brown, 8 Okl.Cr. 40 , 126 P. 245, 249 [1912] and Buck v. Dick, Warden, 27 Okl. 854 , 113 P. 920 [1911], the marketplace reality contradicts such notion.

Abla v. State ex rel. Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

463 P.2d 968 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 13, 1970

This is an appeal from the judgment of the Superior Court affirming an order of the Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board. The Board conducted a hearing and found Vernie R. … Irwin v. Irwin, Okl., 416 P.2d 853 (1966); O. K. Iron & Metal Company v. Sandoval, Okl., 434 P.2d 247 ; Bradley v. McCabe, Okl., 438 P.2d 468 (1967). Affirmed. IRWIN, C. J., BERRY, V. C.

Board of County Commissioners v. Guaranty Loan & Investment Corp.

497 P.2d 423 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 16, 1972

Co. v. Board of County Com’rs, Okl., 389 P.2d 476 , which is determinative. … This argument has been considered and rejected in Hazlett v. Board of County Com’rs, 168 Okl. 290 , 32 P.2d 940 .

Board of Education of City of Sapulpa v. McMahan

26 Okla. 588 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 12, 1910

lower court held that the general initiative and referendum laws as contained in articles 5 and 18 of’ *589 the Constitution and chapter 44 of the Session Laws of 1907-08 had no application to a resolution passed by the board … This question seems to have been-settled by the case of Board of Education of the City of Ardmore et al. v. State of Oklahoma ex rel. I. R.

Marcus v. State ex rel. Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

411 P.2d 539 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 15, 1966

Randles v. Washington State Liquor Control Board, 33 Wash.2d 688 , 206 P.2d 1209 , 9 A.L.R.2d 531 . … In Bayha v.