Case law

State Ex Rel. Board of Education of Independent School Dist. No. 19, Wagoner County v. State Board of Education

208 Okla. 390 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 10, 1953

Bank v. Mills, 134 Okla. 186 , 272 P. 840 . … O’Neal v. Vose, 193 Okla. 451 , 145 P. 2d 411 .

State Ex Rel. Murphy v. Board of Ed.

185 Okla. 654 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 12, 1939

WELCH, V. C. J. This appeal involves the expenditure .of the same funds as was involved in the ease of Board of Education of City of Oklahoma City, a Municipal Corporation, v. Dr. H. H.

State Ex Rel. Walcott v. Brown

111 Okla. 282 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 15, 1925

The transaction between Brown and Cook, and between Cook and the Central State Bank of Muskogee, was made before Brown became cashier and before his bond was executed. … Crowder State Bank v. Aetna Power Co., 41 Okla. 394 , 138 Pac. 302 ; First State Bank of Ada v. Wowack, 56 Okla. 359 , 156 Pac. 207 ; Bennett v. Gage, 74 Okla. 69 176 Pac. 744 .

Hallman v. County Election Board of Oklahoma Cty.

509 P.2d 459 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 13, 1973

However, the shortness of time should not preclude an election board from determining the qualifications of a candidate for a municipal office. … J., WILLIAMS, V. C. J., and BERRY, HODGES, LAVENDER, SIMMS and DOOLIN, JJ., concur.

Board of Com'rs. of Harper County v. Day

46 Okla. 83 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 26, 1915

The precise question is stated in defendant in error’s brief as follows: “Said petition did, not allege that the board of county commissioners were petitioned by the township board to open and establish a public road, and … However, it is manifest that, when the board’s action is invoked in either of these methods, it becomes the duty of the board to determine the fact of "public necessity,” for the act says “the county commissioners shall in

Board of Com'rs of Tulsa v. Co-Operative Publishing

104 Okla. 262 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 8, 1924

Board of County Commissioners of Tulsa County v.

Board of County Com'rs v. Johnson Oil Refining Co.

162 Okla. 185 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 20, 1932

The board upon notice assessed 881 such cars. … Travis v. Dicky, 96 Okla. 256 , 222 P. 527 ; State v. Timbrook’s Est. (Mo. App.) 129 S. W. 1068 .

Board of Comrs. of Roger Mills Co. v. Rowden

8 Okla. 406 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 25, 1899

.: This was an action brought in the district court of Roger Mills county on July 12, 1897, by Sat Rowden, defendant in error, against the board of commissioners of Roger Mills county, plaintiff in error, to *407 recover … This case comes clearly within the principle announced in the case of Board of Com’rs of Roger Mills Co. v.

Drolte v. Board of County Com'rs of Ellis County

176 Okla. 622 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 3, 1936

Williams, 38 Okla. 738 , 135 P. 420 ; In re Cleveland’s Claim, 72 Okla. 279 , 180 P. 852 ; Bass v. Board of County Com’rs, 97 Okla. 94 , 222 P. 995 ; and Board of County Com’rs of Coal County v. … In Board of County Commissioners v.

Vandervoort v. Board of Comrs. of Pawnee Co.

8 Okla. 702 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 11, 1899

The record in cases Nos. 767, 768, and 769, being in the same condition as that of Hoffman v. Board, this volume, p. 225, the petition in error is hereby dismissed.

Gibson v. Board of Com'rs of Okfuskee County

78 Okla. 203 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 27, 1920

Gibson, obligors, from a judgment against them in favor of the board of county commissioners of Okfuskee county.

Pyne v. Board of Com'rs of Woodward County

66 Okla. 57 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 14, 1917

Oklahoma Turnpike Authority v. Board of County Commissioners

329 P.2d 480 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 8, 1958

When it was learned that the Oklahoma Turnpike Authority was not going to build a grade separation or overpass at the intersection of the turnpike project, and a certain section line county road in Ottawa County, the Board

Board of Ed. v. News Dispatch Printing & Audit Co.

117 Okla. 226 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 23, 1926

The concurring of two members of the board in a regular meeting- constitutes the action of the board, and it is not necessary that all three members of the board concur. School District No. 39 v. … The following rule, announced by the court in the case of Doyle et al. v.

Board of Com'rs of Muskogee County v. Fink

60 Okla. 67 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 8, 1916

Plaintiffs contend, on the authority' of New Jersey v. Wilson, supra, Choate v. Trapp, supra, and English v. … In New Jersey v.

Sebranek v. Board of Com'rs of Garfield County

166 Okla. 295 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 21, 1933

Under the provisions of section 1780, Statutes of Oklahoma, 1893, the board of county commissioners was required to keep a book for the entry of all proceedings relating to the establishment or change of roads. … Treas., v. Nelson, 142 Okla. 54 , 285 P. 100 ; Mills v. Glasscock, 26 Okla. 123 , 110 P. 377 . Eor the reasons stated, we find no error in the judgment of the trial court, and that judgment is in all things affirmed.

Holt v. Board of County Com'rs of Oklahoma County

205 Okla. 178 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 9, 1951

In Baldwin v. … Stevenson v. Friend, 196 Okla. 249 , 165 P. 2d 133 . Crews v. Garber, 188 Okla. 570 , 111 P. 2d 1080 .

PRICE v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF PAWNEE CO.

2016 OK 16 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 17, 2016

OSCN Found Document:PRICE v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF PAWNEE CO. … Town of Morris, supra, 150 P. at 686 . ¶10 Conversely, the Board cites Board of County Commissioners of the County of Seminole v.

News-Dispatch Printing & Auditing Co. v. Board of Com'rs

61 Okla. 259 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 14, 1916

Board v. Watson, 7 Okla. 174 , 54 Pac. 441 ; Tulsa St. Ry. Co. v. State, 26 Okla. 559 , 110 Pac. 373 ; Allen v. Board, 28 Okla. 773 , 116 Pac. 175 . … In the case of the Board of County Commissioners of Logan County v.

Board of Com'rs of Sequoyah County v. Mayo

188 Okla. 490 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 4, 1941

As said in Oklahoma City v. Green Const. … J., CORN, V. C. J., and OSBORN and GIBSON, JJ., concur.