Case law

Hinkle v. Board of Com'rs of Oklahoma County

197 Okla. 362 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 1, 1945

We are cited Board of Com’rs of Seminole County v. City of Wewoka, 191 Okla. 142 , 127 P. 2d 826 , and its companion case, Board of Com’rs of Seminole County v. … Board of Com’rs v. Shat-tuck, supra. However, the portion of the 1939 ad valorem he had indorsed was without effect, for under Shnier v. Vahlberg, supra, they were canceled by the 1940 resale.

Wm. Cameron Co., Inc. v. Board of Equalization

87 Okla. 297 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 28, 1922

This is an appeal from the action of the district court affirming the action of the board of equalization of Greer county in refusing to relieve the plaintiff in error from a penalty of $7,500 assessed against its taxable … The assessor shall return the sworn statement so made,. *299 with his assessment, to the board of equal: ization of the city, town or'township, wherein said corporation is located, and if it shall appear that the statement

Berry v. Board of Governors of the Registered Dentists

611 P.2d 628 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 25, 1980

of Oklahoma,” to bring an action for injunctive relief was acknowledged in Lamb v. … In Fosket v.

Board of Com'rs of Sequoyah County v. Mayo

188 Okla. 490 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 4, 1941

As said in Oklahoma City v. Green Const. … J., CORN, V. C. J., and OSBORN and GIBSON, JJ., concur.

Board of Com'rs of Muskogee Co. v. Dudding

62 Okla. 51 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 26, 1916

In Black et al. v. … Smith et al. v. Board Com’rs, 26 Okla. 819 , 110 Pac. 669 ; Fast et al. v. Rogers, 30 Okla. 289 , 119 Pac. 241 ; Garvin County v. Lindsay Bridge Co., 32 Okla. 784 , 124 Pac. 324 ; Turner et al. v.

Board of Com'rs of Kingfisher County v. Eads

52 Okla. 95 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 2, 1915

In the case of Alvah Shelden v. Board of Com’rs et al., 48 Kan. 356 , 29 Pac. 759 , 16 L. R. … In the case of Franklin County v. Ranck, 9 Ohio Cir. Ct.

Board of Com'rs of Oklahoma Co. v. Close Bros.

82 Okla. 174 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 24, 1921

In regard to penalties this court in the case of the Board of County Commissioners of Custer Co. v. … The defendant in error, however, relies upon the case of Board of County Commissioners v. Seymour, 45 Okla. 533 , 146 Pac. 219 .

State Ex Rel. Short v. State Board of Equalization

107 Okla. 118 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 9, 1924

Postel v. Marcues [Wis.] 152 N. W. 419 .) … City of Chicago v. Reeves (Ill.) 77 N. E. 237 : Warfield v. Vandever (Md.) 60 Atl. 538 ; Commonwealth v. Bowman (Ky.) 231 S. W. 35 ; Sims v. Sawyer (W. Va.) 101 S. E. 467 ; Johnson v.

North Side State Bank v. Board of County Commissioners

65 O.B.A.J. 1195 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 29, 1994

Board of Law Library Trustees v. State, Okl., 825 P.2d 1285 , 1291 n. 32 (1992); Willis, supra note 6 , 789 P.2d at 1286-87 ; Benham v. Keller, Okl., 673 P.2d 152, 154 (1983); Utica Nat. Bank and Trust v. Assoc. … North Side I settles no law that affects or binds either the Board or the Bank, one against the other. Willis, supra note 6 , 789 P.2d at 1285 . 10 . Cartwright v.

School Board of Consolidated District No. 36 v. Edwards

184 Okla. 384 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 28, 1939

In Crawford v. … WELCH, V. C. J., and CORN, J., absent.

State v. County Election Board of Comanche County

180 Okla. 334 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 6, 1937

On the 28th day of April, 1934, plaintiff filed a proceeding against the county election board of Comanche county, Okla., seeking a writ of mandamus to declare him the holder of an of Bce as councilman of the city council … We are of the opinion that this proceeding must be dismissed under the rule announced in Edwards v. Welch, 29 Okla. 335 , 116 P. 791 ; Hudson v. Moore, 169 Okla. 12 , 35 P. (2d) 886 ; Revard v.

Derieg v. Board of Education of Town of Carnegie

202 Okla. 577 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 28, 1950

Among these authorities are: Bridges v. Thomas, 8 Okla. 620 , 58 P. 955 ; Kilgore v. Lyle, 30 Okla. 596 , 120 P. 626 ; Etchen v. Ferguson, 59 Okla. 280 , 159 P. 306 ; McDowel v. King et al., 186 Okla. 90 , 96 P. 2d 37 . … In the case of Rose v.

BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF POLICE PENSION, ETC v. Burns

348 P.2d 1067 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 29, 1959

This Court denied recovery in Board of Trustees of Firemen’s Relief and Pension Fund v. … Board of Trustees of Firemen’s Relief and Pension Fund of City of Tulsa v.

Board of Com'rs v. News-Dispatch Ptg. & Audit Co.

122 Okla. 107 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 14, 1926

Board of Com’rs of Tulsa County v. News-Dispatch Printing & Audit Co., 104 Okla. 260 , 231 Pac. 250 ; Board of County Com’rs v. Co-Operative Publishing Co., 104 Okla. 262 , 231 Pac. 251 : Edelmann v. … Board of County Com’rs and News-Dispatch Printing & Auditing Co. v. Board of County Com’rs, supra.

Alexander v. Board of Ed., Town of Carmen

161 Okla. 287 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 13, 1932

Faught v. City of Sapulpa, 145 Okla. 164 , 292 P. 15 . … Faught v. City of Sapulpa, supra.

Parker v. Board of Com'rs of Okmulgee County

187 Okla. 311 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 21, 1940

This is a companion case to Parker v. Board of County Commissioners of Okmulgee County, 187 Okla. 308 , 102 P. 2d 880 , this day decided.

News Dispatch Printing & Audit Co. v. Board of Com'rs

177 Okla. 162 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 17, 1935

the judgment and order overruling the motion for new trial in the district court of Adair county, in an action wherein the News Dispatch Printing & Audit Company, a corporation, plaintiff in error, was plaintiff, and the board … This action was commenced in the district court of Adair county by the plaintiff, against the board of county commissioners of said county, to recover judgment on claims against said county for the amount of $1,262.32, due

Mahr v. Board of County Com'rs of Pottawatomie County

26 Okla. 628 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 12, 1910

In Board of County Commissioners of Cleveland County v. … No. 89 v. Shelton, infra, 109 Pac. 67 .

Pease v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMM'RS, OSAGE COUNTY

550 P.2d 565 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 18, 1976

See Rollow v. West, 479 P.2d 962 (Okl.1971). The statute does not provide a restriction on the duration of such an organization, only that the agreement shall specify its duration. … Blankenship v. Atoka County, 456 P.2d 537 (Okl.1967). INCOG is not a unit of state government. To the contrary it is formed to assist local communities and maintain local government.

State Ex Rel. Board of Education of Independent School Dist. No. 19, Wagoner County v. State Board of Education

208 Okla. 390 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 10, 1953

Bank v. Mills, 134 Okla. 186 , 272 P. 840 . … O’Neal v. Vose, 193 Okla. 451 , 145 P. 2d 411 .