Case law

Board of Com'rs of Tillman County v. Little

80 Okla. 45 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 14, 1920

Board of County Commr's. of Day County v. State

19 Okla. 375 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 5, 1907

Mitchell v. Overman, 103 U. S. 65 ; Borer v. Chapman, 119 U. S. 596 . … S. 539 , Knox v. Aspinwell; 99 U. S. 86 , Hackett v. Ottawa; 105 U. S. 342 , Ottawa v. National Bk.; 103 U. S. 683 , Walnut v. Wade; 89 Fed. 619 , Waite v. Santa Cruz; 65 U. S. 287 , Bissell v. Jeffersonville.

Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v. Heublein Wines, International

566 P.2d 1158 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 12, 1977

In Head v. … In California v.

Iglehart v. Board of County Commissioners of Rogers County

73 O.B.A.J. 2803 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 1, 2002

. ¶ 4 The trial court gave summary judgment to Utility Company as well as to Board of County Commissioners of Rogers County (Board). Plaintiffs brought separate appeals from the adverse summary judgments. … Brown v. Nicholson, 1997 OK 32, ¶ 5 , 935 P.2d 319, 321 . See also Kluver v. Weatherford Hosp.

Board of Medical Examiners of Oklahoma v. Gulley

41 Okla. 63 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 14, 1913

College v. People ex rel., 182 Ill. 274 . 55 N. E. 345 . … While the board is administrative and executive, and does not exercise judicial functions (Jamieson v.

Western Chem. v. Board of Com'rs, Pottawatomie Co.

170 Okla. 337 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 22, 1935

Board of Commissioners of Tulsa County v. News-Dispatch Printing & Audit Co., 104 Okla. 260 , 231 P. 250 ; Board of County Commissioners v. Co-operative Publishing Co., 104 Okla. 262 , 231 P. 251 ; Edelman v. … Board of County Commissioners, supra: and News-Dispatch Printing & Auditing Co. v. Board of County Commissioners, supra.”

State Board of Public Affairs v. Principal Funding Corp.

542 P.2d 503 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 28, 1975

In State ex rel State Board of Public Affairs v. … State Board of Public Affairs v.

Aero Design & Engineering Co. v. Board of Review

356 P.2d 344 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 2, 1960

Aero contends that our opinion in Board of Review et al. v. Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp., 193 Okl. 36 , 141 P.2d 69 , controls this appeal, and defendants in error contend that it is not in point. … J., WILLIAMS, V. C. J.- and WELCH, JOHNSON, JACKSON, IRWIN and BERRY, JJ., concur. BLACKBIRD, J., dissents.

Asher State Bank v. Board of Com'rs of Pottawatomie

31 Okla. 145 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 9, 1912

From the decision of the board of equalization an appeal was taken to the county-court, where judgment was rendered sustaining the action of the board of county commissioners. … From that judg *146 ment this appeal is attempted to be prosecuted; but, under the decision of this court in Board of County Commissioners of Kingfisher County v.

Board of County Commissioners v. State Industrial Commission

168 Okla. 175 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 1, 1934

CULLISON, V. C. J. … This is an original proceeding before this court by the board of county commissioners of Oklahoma coun *176 ty, Oída., petitioner, to review an award of the State Industrial Commission made and entered on September 15, 1933

Edwards v. Board of Comr's of Oklahoma County

169 Okla. 87 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 25, 1934

As stated in the ease of Levy Bros. v. … A situation very similar to the one in the case at bar is presented by the facts in the case of Wilson v. Board of Commissioners of Allen County et al. (Kan.) 162 P. 1158 .

Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v. Central Liquor Co.

421 P.2d 244 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 6, 1966

Mid-Continent Pipe Line Co. v. Stephens. County Excise Board, Okl., 312 P.2d 883 ; Woods v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 207 Okl. 490 , 251 P.2d 505 . In Stemmons, Inc. v.. Universal C. I. T. … v.

Rheam v. Board of Regents of University of Oklahoma

161 Okla. 268 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 24, 1933

It was so held in Linten v. Lucy Cobb Institute (Ga.) 45 S. E. 53 ; Bryant v. Whisenant (Ala.) 52 So. 525 , and State ex rel. Priest v. Regents of the University of Wisconsin (Wis.) 11 N. W. 472 . … Attorney General v.

County Board of Equalization v. Muskogee Industrial Finance Corp.

357 P.2d 224 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 29, 1960

The County Board of Equalization principally relies upon our decision in Board of County Commissioners, etc. v. … Plummer v. Davis, 169 Okl. 374 , 36 P.2d 938 .

Smith Ex Rel. State v. State Board of Equalization

630 P.2d 1264 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 15, 1981

This Court in Draper v. … Edwards v. Childers, 102 Okl. 158 , 228 P. 472, 473 (1924); Menefee v. Askew, 25 Okl. 623 , 107 P. 159, 161 (1910). . This Court in Draper v.

Buchner v. Board of Com'rs of Hughes County

166 Okla. 274 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 5, 1933

In construing said provision, this court, in the ease of State v. State ex rel. … made. *277 A case very similar as to facts is the case of Blake v.

Trent Ex Rel. Trent v. Board of County Commissioners

755 P.2d 615 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 17, 1988

The road and the bridge are owned and maintained by the Board of County Commissioners of Johnston County (County or appellee). … Appellants assert that strict compliance with the statute is not necessary as long as there is substantial compliance citing Duesterhaus v. City of Edmond, 634 P.2d 720 (Okl.1981) and Reirdon v.

Miller v. Board of Com'rs of Beaver County

171 Okla. 553 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 16, 1935

Co. v. … McKee v. Adair County Election Board, 36 Okla. 258 , 128 P. 294 ; Kile v. Graham, 108 Okla. 179 , 235 P. 524 ; Harris v. Boggess, 113 Okla. 60 , 238 P. 477 .

Campbell v. Board of Com'rs of Oklahoma County

167 Okla. 510 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 20, 1934

The Mississippi Supreme Court, in the case of Board of Supervisors of Quitman County v. … To the same effect are Raley v. Umatilla County, 15 Ore. 172 , 13 P. 890 ; Hayward v. Davidson, 41 Ind. 212 ; New York Life Insurance Co. v. Board of County Commissioners of Cuyahoga County, 106 Fed. 123 ; and Barnes v.

Bostick v. Board of County Commissioners of Noble Co.

19 Okla. 92 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 4, 1907

all reason by the city board of equalization, without authority of law and by the reason of a mistake-made by the city board, as evidenced by Exhibit A, hereto attached and made a part hereof. … jurisdiction as the inferior tribunal had, and can only investigate in a given case those propositions which were before the inferior court, and which the inferior court might have investigated and determined. 2 Cyc. 537; Cooper v.