Case law

Oklahoma Water Resources Board v. City of Lawton

580 P.2d 510 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 19, 1978

V. Field and A. Bradford, the Civil Code of New York— Field Code). … One of the cases footnoted, Broadbent v. Ramsbotham, 11 Exch. 602, 25 L.J.

Holmes v. Board of Com'rs of Osage County

132 Okla. 297 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 25, 1928

Adams v. Power, 87 Okla. 80 , 209 Pac. 395 .

Board of Com'rs of Kingfisher County v. Shutler

139 Okla. 52 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 8, 1929

But. in view of the holding of this court in State v. Blake, 139 Okla. 241 , 280 Pac. 833 , we are sure of the opinion that there is nothing now before this court for review. In State v. … However, from the holding in the case of State v.

Board of County Commisioners v. City of Muskogee

62 O.B.A.J. 3429 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 5, 1991

City of Hollis, 193 Okl. 241 , 142 P.2d 633, 640 (1943); Board of Education of City of Drumright v. Board of County Com’rs of Creek County, 171 Okl. 464 , 43 P.2d 139, 140 (1935); McMahan v. … . . 62 O.S.1981 §§ 431, 435; Board of Education v.

Sipuel v. Board of Regents of University of Oklahoma

199 Okla. 36 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 29, 1947

Cumming v. Board of Education, 175 U. S. 528 , loc. cit. 545, 20 S. Ct. 197 , loc. cit. 201, 44 L. Ed. 262 . … Bluford v. Canada, 348 Mo. 298 , 153 S.

Board of Com'rs of Pottawatomie County v. Grace

23 Okla. 35 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 13, 1909

Pope v. Board of Com'rs of Oklahoma Co.

45 Okla. 523 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 2, 1915

This is an appeal from the action of the superior court of Oklahoma county in affirming the action of. the board of county commissioners of said county in rejecting the claim of the county attorney thereof for 25 per cent … Pope v. Board of County Com’rs. of Oklahoma County, ante, 146 Pac. 222 , just handed down. As in that cause the judgment of the court below is affirmed, the same order will be entered herein.

Texas Empire Pipe Line Co. v. Excise Board

165 Okla. 90 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 28, 1933

The rule stated in McMahan v. Board of Education, supra, was followed by the defendant in this case. … Board of Education, supra. We find no error in the judgment of the Court of Tax Review denying the protest, and the judgment of that court is in all things affirmed. RILEY, C. J., CÜLLISON, V. C.

Tulsa Exposition & Fair Corp. v. Board of County Commissioners

468 P.2d 501 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 8, 1970

Board of County Commissioners, Okl., 274 P.2d 1021 ; Board of County Commissioners v. Warram, Okl., 285 P.2d 1034 . … Brown v. State Election Board, Okl., 369 P.2d 140 ; Shaw v. Grumbine, 137 Okl. 95 , 278 P. 311 ; National Surety Co. v. Sand Springs State Bank, 74 Okl. 176 , 177 P. 574 .

Board of Com'rs of Muskogee County v. Fink

45 Okla. 121 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 22, 1914

Attached to the motion is a certificate of the county clerk to the effect that the minutes and records of the board of county commissioners do not show that they authorized the appeal. Counsel cite Kingfisher Co. v. … See Leedy v.

Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Oklahoma County Excise Board

618 P.2d 915 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 27, 1980

In making this argument, the Appellant Cities rely upon Smartt v. Board of County Com’rs of Craig County, 67 Okl. 141 , 169 P. 1101 (1917). … In State Insurance Fund v. Board of Com’rs of Creek County, 195 Okl. 66 , 155 P.2d 542 (1945), we clarified our holding in Smartt, supra.

State ex rel. Board of Ed. v. Buchanan

140 Okla. 12 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 11, 1928

In the body of the opinion of the case of Board of Education of City of Alva v. … New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Board of Ed., Cons. School Dist. No. 1, 124 Okla. 101 , 253 Pac. 1012 .

Board of Com'rs of Osage County v. Prentice

183 Okla. 542 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 18, 1938

Co. v. … Board of Com’rs of Carter County et al., 160 Okla. 276 , 16 P.2d 104 ; Protest of Gulf Pipe Line Co., Seminole County, et al. v. Gulf Pipe Line Co., 168 Okla. 136 , 32 P.2d 42 , and Western Paint & Chemical Co. v.

Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Excise Board

168 Okla. 619 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 28, 1934

of Marshall County v. … Co. v. State, 28 Okla. 94 , 113 P. 921 .

Johnston v. Board of Com'rs of Murray County

53 Okla. 693 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 23, 1916

In Board of Commissioners of Hinsdale County v. Crump, 18 Colo. … State v. Moore, 1 Ohio Dec. (Reprint) 506; Mathews v. Board Com’rs Lincoln County, 90 Minn. 348 , 97 N. W. 101 .

State Ex Rel. Rogers v. State Election Board

168 Okla. 441 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 6, 1934

Huff v. State Election Board, 168 Okla. 277 , 32 P. (2d) 920 . In designating a particular individual it should also distinguish him from others. … Howard v. Reford Bond, John W. Hayson and J. Wm.

Wichita Falls & N. W. R. Co. v. J. J. Brown Co.

76 Okla. 84 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 27, 1919

J- Brown Company.” … Brown at once called Mr.

Board of Education of City of Ardmore v. State

26 Okla. 366 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 10, 1910

The case of Kennedy, City Treasurer, v. … Kennedy v. Miller, 97 Cal 434 [ 32 Pac. 558 ].” The case of Los Angeles City School Dist. v.

McGeisey v. Board of Com'rs. of Seminole County

45 Okla. 10 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 24, 1914

From this judgment plaintiff appeals. *11 Every proposition involved in this ease has been recently decided by this court in the cast of Marcy v. … Board of County Commissioners of Seminole County et al., ante, 144 Pac. 611 . On the authority of that ease, the judgment of the trial court is reversed and the case remanded. See, also, Tiger v. Western Inv.

Excise Board of Tulsa County v. City of Tulsa

180 Okla. 248 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 20, 1937

See, also, Lowden v. Caddo County Excise Board, 176 Okla. 213 , 55 P. (2d) 472 ; Greer County Excise Board v. Lowden, 177 Okla. 7 , 57 P. (2d) 612 ; Board of Education of City of Guthrie v. … Logan County Excise Board, 86 Okla. 24 , 206 P. 517 , and Webster v. Morris, 129 Okla. 145 , 264 P. 190 , and others to the same effect.