Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersokla

10,000+ results

1.95s

  • Board of County Commissioners v. City of Marlow

    148 Okla. 126 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 16, 1930

    This is an action by cbe city of Marlow against the board of county commissioners of Stephens county to recover certain sums of money belonging to the said city, in which it was alleged it was collected 'by the county and … The case is a companion ease to the ease of Brown, Co. Treas., v. Board of Education, No. 19957, 148 Okla. 97 , 298 Pac. 249 , this day decided by this court.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Board of Com'rs of Mayes County v. Vann

    60 Okla. 86 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 25, 1916

    Mobley v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co., 44 Okla. 788 , 145 Pac. 321 ; Schuck v. Moore, 48 Okla. 533 , 150 Pac. 461 ; Dodder v. Washita Lumber Co., 51 Okla. 25 , 151 Pac. 679 ; In re. … Board of Commissioners v. State, 48 Okla. 477 , 150 Pac. 155 ; Tarkenton v. Carpenter, 48 Okla. 498 , 150 Pac. 482 ; Walker v. Walker, 54 Okla. 666 , 154 Pac. 512 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Stockton v. Board of Com'rs of Pittsburg County

    184 Okla. 150 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 20, 1938

    In this connection, see Thomas v. Farrier, 170 Okla. 263 , 65 P.2d 520 : City of Tulsa v. Aaronson, 103 Okla. 159 , 229 P. 596 . … The contention is contrary to our holding in Oklahoma City v. Kelsey, 160 Okla. 48 , 15 P.2d 816 ; Bohnsack v. Ponca City Dev. Co., 167 Okla. 177 , 29 P.2d 61 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Huntington v. Board of Com'rs of Grant County

    44 Okla. 276 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 17, 1914

    Orendorff v. Board of Commissioners, ante, 144 Pac. 383 , and Ham *278 ilton et al. v. Board of Commisisoners, post, were suits against the other two county commissioners during the same period. The suit Anderson v. … Board of Commissioners, ante, 143 Pac. 1145 , is a suit against the county treasurer. Zeigler v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Sizemore v. State Election Board

    203 Okla. 1 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 25, 1950

    On March 30, 1950, the secretary of the State Election Board notified all county election board secretaries that: “Pursuant to the provisions of Title 26, Section 114, O. … In this connection the Board calls attention to the title of 25 O.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Board of Com'rs of Garfield County v. Anderson

    167 Okla. 253 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 16, 1934

    Com’rs v. Seawell, 3 Okla. 281 , 41 P. 592 ; Butler v. Bd. of Com’rs, 57 Okla. 748 , 157 P. 912 ; Western Paint Co. v. Bd. of Com’rs, 161 Okla. 300 , 18 P. (2d) 888 ; Bd. of Com’rs of Hughes Co. v. … The rule as to the requisite proof of intention to dedicate is well stated in Lewis v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • McGrath v. Rrown

    190 Okla. 144 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 20, 1941

    the proceedings for the reason that all questions presented had become moot, since Brown- had completed the well for which the permit was issued (Keaton v. … In Reinhart & Donovan Co. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Citizens Security Bank & Trust v. Banking Board of Oklahoma

    627 P.2d 423 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 10, 1981

    Brown v. Banking Board, Okl., 512 P.2d 166, 168 [1973] (Brown I); Brown v. Banking Board, Okl., 579 P.2d 1267, 1271 [1978] (Brown II). . … Bank of Commerce, Stillwell v. Banking Board, Okl., 534 P.2d 923, 924 [1975]; In re Bank of Bixby v. Banking Board, Okl., 524 P.2d 14, 16 [1974]. . In re Bank of Bixby v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • King v. Board of Regents, Claremore Junior College

    541 P.2d 836 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 14, 1975

    We conclude the Board’s decision not to re-employ the nontenured instructors did not deprive them of their liberty. In Board of Regents v. … In Papadopoulos v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Groenewold v. Board of Com'rs of Kingfisher County

    195 Okla. 526 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 22, 1945

    Board of Commissioners of Sequoyah County v. McGowan, 104 Okla. 283 , 231 P. 258 . … Board of Com’rs of Grant County v. Comstock, 161 Okla. 43 , 17 P. 2d 501 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Board of Equalization v. People's Nat. Bank of Kingfisher

    79 Okla. 312 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 16, 1920

    Board of Equalization of Oklahoma County v. First State Bank of Oklahoma City, 77 Okla. 291 , 188 Pac. 115 ; Brown v. Hennessey State Bank, 78 Okla. 141 , 189 Pac. 355 . Second. … Board of Equalization of Oklahoma County v. First. State Bank of Oklahoma City, supra; Brown v. Hennessey State Bank, supra; First Nat. Bank of Junction City v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Morris v. Board of Com'rs of Love County

    74 Okla. 199 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 20, 1917

    In Bowles v. Oklahoma City et al., 24 Okla. 579 , 104 Pac. 902 (24 L. R. A. [N. … The decision is followed by this court in Boone v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Crawford v. Board of Comrs. of Noble County

    8 Okla. 450 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 24, 1899

    In Goose River Bank v. Willow Lake School Tp., 1 N. D. 26 , 44 N. … In Hampton v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Whittinghill v. Board of Com'rs of Woodward County

    68 Okla. 320 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 20, 1918

    Board of County Commissioners of Logan County v. Jones, 4 Okla. 341 , 51 Pac. 565 ; Anderson v. Board of Commissioners of Grant County, 44 Okla. 165 , 143 Pac. 1145 ; Baker v. … News-Dispatcb Printing & Auditing Co. v. Board of Commissioners of Grady County, 61 Okla. 259, 161 Pac. 207 ; Chase v. Board of Commissioners, 37 Colo. 268 , 86 Pac. 1011 , 11 Ann. Cas. 483.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Schulte v. Board of County Com'rs Pontotoc Co.

    122 Okla. 205 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 30, 1926

    party, the authority of the board to employ counsel was not limited by the rule laid down in Honnold v. … Board of County Commissioners, supra, and as supporting this contention he cites Board of County Commissioners of Lincoln County v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Board of Com'rs of Blaine County v. Foster

    169 Okla. 384 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 30, 1934

    •In this state it has been determined that the county has the right of appeal from a judgment rendered against it (Rice v. Swartz, 90 Okla. 16 , 215 P. 605 ; Board of County Commissioners of Craig County v. Germo Mfg. … Co., 71 Okla. 237 , 176 P. 902 ; Sequoyah County v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Board County Commissioners of Garfield Co. v. Porter

    19 Okla. 588 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 5, 1907

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Rodolf v. Board of Com'rs of Tulsa County

    122 Okla. 120 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 21, 1926

    Clark v. … Cadman v. Smith, 15 Okla. 633 , 85 Pac. 346 ; Smith v. Bostapah, 103 Okla. 258 , 229 Pac. 1039 ; Sitton v. Hernstadt, 106 Okla. 140 , 233 Pac. 676 .

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Leach v. Board of Com'rs of Mayes County

    173 Okla. 270 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 25, 1935

    A similar question herein involved is found in the case of Robinson v. … MeNEILL, C. ,T., OSBORN, V. C. J., and BAYLESS and WELCH, JJ., concur.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Looney v. County Election Board of Hughes County

    145 Okla. 23 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 9, 1930

    Looney v. County Election Board of Seminole County, this day decided, 145' Okla. 25, 291 Pac. 554 . The contentions made in that case are made in this case. … The Supreme Court of Montana, in the case of Gillespie v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.