Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.95s
Board of County Commissioners v. City of Marlow
148 Okla. 126 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 16, 1930
This is an action by cbe city of Marlow against the board of county commissioners of Stephens county to recover certain sums of money belonging to the said city, in which it was alleged it was collected 'by the county and … The case is a companion ease to the ease of Brown, Co. Treas., v. Board of Education, No. 19957, 148 Okla. 97 , 298 Pac. 249 , this day decided by this court.
Cited 3 timesPublishedBoard of Com'rs of Mayes County v. Vann
60 Okla. 86 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 25, 1916
Mobley v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co., 44 Okla. 788 , 145 Pac. 321 ; Schuck v. Moore, 48 Okla. 533 , 150 Pac. 461 ; Dodder v. Washita Lumber Co., 51 Okla. 25 , 151 Pac. 679 ; In re. … Board of Commissioners v. State, 48 Okla. 477 , 150 Pac. 155 ; Tarkenton v. Carpenter, 48 Okla. 498 , 150 Pac. 482 ; Walker v. Walker, 54 Okla. 666 , 154 Pac. 512 .
Cited 3 timesPublishedStockton v. Board of Com'rs of Pittsburg County
184 Okla. 150 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 20, 1938
In this connection, see Thomas v. Farrier, 170 Okla. 263 , 65 P.2d 520 : City of Tulsa v. Aaronson, 103 Okla. 159 , 229 P. 596 . … The contention is contrary to our holding in Oklahoma City v. Kelsey, 160 Okla. 48 , 15 P.2d 816 ; Bohnsack v. Ponca City Dev. Co., 167 Okla. 177 , 29 P.2d 61 .
Cited 4 timesPublishedHuntington v. Board of Com'rs of Grant County
44 Okla. 276 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 17, 1914
Orendorff v. Board of Commissioners, ante, 144 Pac. 383 , and Ham *278 ilton et al. v. Board of Commisisoners, post, were suits against the other two county commissioners during the same period. The suit Anderson v. … Board of Commissioners, ante, 143 Pac. 1145 , is a suit against the county treasurer. Zeigler v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedState ex rel. Sizemore v. State Election Board
203 Okla. 1 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 25, 1950
On March 30, 1950, the secretary of the State Election Board notified all county election board secretaries that: “Pursuant to the provisions of Title 26, Section 114, O. … In this connection the Board calls attention to the title of 25 O.
Cited 4 timesPublishedBoard of Com'rs of Garfield County v. Anderson
167 Okla. 253 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 16, 1934
Com’rs v. Seawell, 3 Okla. 281 , 41 P. 592 ; Butler v. Bd. of Com’rs, 57 Okla. 748 , 157 P. 912 ; Western Paint Co. v. Bd. of Com’rs, 161 Okla. 300 , 18 P. (2d) 888 ; Bd. of Com’rs of Hughes Co. v. … The rule as to the requisite proof of intention to dedicate is well stated in Lewis v.
Cited 11 timesPublished190 Okla. 144 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 20, 1941
the proceedings for the reason that all questions presented had become moot, since Brown- had completed the well for which the permit was issued (Keaton v. … In Reinhart & Donovan Co. v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedCitizens Security Bank & Trust v. Banking Board of Oklahoma
627 P.2d 423 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 10, 1981
Brown v. Banking Board, Okl., 512 P.2d 166, 168 [1973] (Brown I); Brown v. Banking Board, Okl., 579 P.2d 1267, 1271 [1978] (Brown II). . … Bank of Commerce, Stillwell v. Banking Board, Okl., 534 P.2d 923, 924 [1975]; In re Bank of Bixby v. Banking Board, Okl., 524 P.2d 14, 16 [1974]. . In re Bank of Bixby v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedKing v. Board of Regents, Claremore Junior College
541 P.2d 836 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 14, 1975
We conclude the Board’s decision not to re-employ the nontenured instructors did not deprive them of their liberty. In Board of Regents v. … In Papadopoulos v.
Cited 10 timesPublishedGroenewold v. Board of Com'rs of Kingfisher County
195 Okla. 526 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 22, 1945
Board of Commissioners of Sequoyah County v. McGowan, 104 Okla. 283 , 231 P. 258 . … Board of Com’rs of Grant County v. Comstock, 161 Okla. 43 , 17 P. 2d 501 .
Cited 5 timesPublishedBoard of Equalization v. People's Nat. Bank of Kingfisher
79 Okla. 312 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 16, 1920
Board of Equalization of Oklahoma County v. First State Bank of Oklahoma City, 77 Okla. 291 , 188 Pac. 115 ; Brown v. Hennessey State Bank, 78 Okla. 141 , 189 Pac. 355 . Second. … Board of Equalization of Oklahoma County v. First. State Bank of Oklahoma City, supra; Brown v. Hennessey State Bank, supra; First Nat. Bank of Junction City v.
Cited 10 timesPublishedMorris v. Board of Com'rs of Love County
74 Okla. 199 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 20, 1917
In Bowles v. Oklahoma City et al., 24 Okla. 579 , 104 Pac. 902 (24 L. R. A. [N. … The decision is followed by this court in Boone v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedCrawford v. Board of Comrs. of Noble County
8 Okla. 450 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 24, 1899
In Goose River Bank v. Willow Lake School Tp., 1 N. D. 26 , 44 N. … In Hampton v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedWhittinghill v. Board of Com'rs of Woodward County
68 Okla. 320 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 20, 1918
Board of County Commissioners of Logan County v. Jones, 4 Okla. 341 , 51 Pac. 565 ; Anderson v. Board of Commissioners of Grant County, 44 Okla. 165 , 143 Pac. 1145 ; Baker v. … News-Dispatcb Printing & Auditing Co. v. Board of Commissioners of Grady County, 61 Okla. 259, 161 Pac. 207 ; Chase v. Board of Commissioners, 37 Colo. 268 , 86 Pac. 1011 , 11 Ann. Cas. 483.
Cited 7 timesPublishedSchulte v. Board of County Com'rs Pontotoc Co.
122 Okla. 205 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 30, 1926
party, the authority of the board to employ counsel was not limited by the rule laid down in Honnold v. … Board of County Commissioners, supra, and as supporting this contention he cites Board of County Commissioners of Lincoln County v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedBoard of Com'rs of Blaine County v. Foster
169 Okla. 384 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 30, 1934
•In this state it has been determined that the county has the right of appeal from a judgment rendered against it (Rice v. Swartz, 90 Okla. 16 , 215 P. 605 ; Board of County Commissioners of Craig County v. Germo Mfg. … Co., 71 Okla. 237 , 176 P. 902 ; Sequoyah County v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedBoard County Commissioners of Garfield Co. v. Porter
19 Okla. 588 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 5, 1907
Cited 1 timesPublishedRodolf v. Board of Com'rs of Tulsa County
122 Okla. 120 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 21, 1926
Clark v. … Cadman v. Smith, 15 Okla. 633 , 85 Pac. 346 ; Smith v. Bostapah, 103 Okla. 258 , 229 Pac. 1039 ; Sitton v. Hernstadt, 106 Okla. 140 , 233 Pac. 676 .
Cited 6 timesPublishedLeach v. Board of Com'rs of Mayes County
173 Okla. 270 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 25, 1935
A similar question herein involved is found in the case of Robinson v. … MeNEILL, C. ,T., OSBORN, V. C. J., and BAYLESS and WELCH, JJ., concur.
Cited 5 timesPublishedLooney v. County Election Board of Hughes County
145 Okla. 23 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 9, 1930
Looney v. County Election Board of Seminole County, this day decided, 145' Okla. 25, 291 Pac. 554 . The contentions made in that case are made in this case. … The Supreme Court of Montana, in the case of Gillespie v.
Cited 4 timesPublished
Ask Donna