Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
302 results
0.88s
284 F. 181 · District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · Aug 12, 1922
Davidson are her duly qualified and acting guardians.” … Whilst Congress may make such provision, its intent to do so should be clearly manifested. The allottee is not only a citizen of the United States, but also a- citizen of the state.
Cited 3 timesPublishedDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · Jan 3, 2024
The Court must identify any cognizable claims and dismiss any claims that are frivolous, malicious, fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such … The “denial of a grievance, by itself without any connection to the violation of constitutional rights alleged by the plaintiff, does not establish personal participation under § 1983.” Gallagher v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown376 F. Supp. 402 · District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · May 30, 1974
The Board has statutory authority to establish policies for the operation of the Department. Title 57 O.S.A. §§ 503, 504. … This study shall be conducted by an individual(s) qualified in the areas of di,et and nutrition.
Cited 75 timesPublishedDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · May 28, 2020
Plaintiff alleges in his “Statement of the Case” that he has been denied continuity of care by a “qualified” physician after his diagnosis of “lumbar and cervical degenerative disc disease with probable spinal stenosis with … The movant also must establish a violation of his constitutional rights. Rizzo v. Goode, 423 U.S. 362, 377 (1976).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · May 24, 2021
The Court must identify any cognizable claims and dismiss any claims that are frivolous, malicious, fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such … The “denial of a grievance, by itself without any connection to the violation of constitutional rights alleged by the plaintiff, does not establish personal participation under § 1983.” Gallagher v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownFields v. Hench's Country Liv'n Homes of Calera
District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · Sep 18, 2025
Plaintiffs further argue for a narrow interpretation of § 754(2), suggesting it should not provide blanket immunity without an equivalent private damages remedy in the regulated scheme. [Id. at 13]. … The Oklahoma Supreme Court definitively established in Osburn v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown197 F. 383 · District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · Mar 4, 1911
That portion of the petition upon' which plaintiffs rely as establishing their contention that the suit aris'es tinder the Constitution or laws of the United States is as follows :. ' ¡ “That, plaintiffs derived title to … public proclamation that the same shall be voted upon at any special election to be held for that purpose within thirty days thereafter, on a certain day therein named; and all male 'citizens of each of the said tribes qualified
Cited 3 timesPublishedDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · Dec 15, 2023
The Government alleges that “[t]he record in this case clearly establishes Mr. Widell and Ms. … Clearly, Defendant’s first allegation of ineffectiveness is conclusory, and unsupported by either fact or legal authority.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · Dec 1, 2025
Matthew does not believe she is qualified to render an expert opinion on causation. Doc. 169 at 2. As such, Dr. … Matthew’s testimony cannot be used establish the causation element of Plaintiffs’ claims.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · Oct 9, 2020
The “denial of a grievance, by itself without any connection to the violation of constitutional rights alleged by the plaintiff, does not establish personal participation under § 1983.” Gallagher v. … Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 5.2(a), the amended complaint must be clearly legible, and only one side of the paper may be used.
Cited 0 timesUnknownWingfield v. Social Security Administration
District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · Jul 24, 2023
Step two requires the claimant to establish that he has a medically severe impairment (or combination of impairments) that significantly limits her ability to do basic work activities. … The evidence does not reflect further limitations related to any of the claimant’s medically determinable but nonsevere impairments, and the ALJ clearly considered them when she pointed to the evidence related to them
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · Sep 25, 2020
The burden of establishing subject matter jurisdiction is on the party asserting it. See Pueblo of Jemez v. United States, 790 F.3d 1143, 1151 (10th Cir. 2015). … “In recent years,” the Supreme Court has “repeatedly held that procedural rules, including time bars, cabin a court’s power only if Congress has clearly stated as much.”
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · Jan 3, 2024
The Court must identify any cognizable claims and dismiss any claims that are frivolous, malicious, fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such … The “denial of a grievance, by itself without any connection to the violation of constitutional rights alleged by the plaintiff, does not establish personal participation under § 1983.” Gallagher v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · May 7, 2024
The Court must identify any cognizable claims and dismiss any claims that are frivolous, malicious, fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such … The “denial of a grievance, by itself without any connection to the violation of constitutional rights alleged by the plaintiff, does not establish personal participation under § 1983.” Gallagher v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownWells v. Social Security Administration
District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · Mar 16, 2020
However, as set forth above, the ALJ clearly considered the claimant’s vision and she does not point to any evidence to support the visual limitations she claims. … When the ALJ’s paragraph B analysis is applied to Listing 12.05B, the claimant clearly does not meet the significant deficits in adaptive functioning requirement and is therefore precluded from qualifying under this listing
Cited 0 timesUnknownCanoe v. Social Security Administration
District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · Aug 15, 2023
“Instead, SSR 85-28 requires that the evidence ‘clearly establish’ that the impairment is not severe; if not the ALJ must proceed to the subsequent steps of the sequential evaluation process.” Gonzales v. … Absent a finding that the evidence “clearly established” that Claimant had no severe impairment, the ALJ was required to continue through the sequential analysis.3 Additionally,
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · Sep 30, 2022
“To qualify as an ‘adequate’ procedural ground, a state rule must be ‘firmly established and regularly followed.’” Walker v. Martin, 562 U.S. 307, 316 (2011) (quoting Beard v. Kindler, 558 U.S. 53, 60-61 (2009)). … Under clearly established federal law announced in Cuyler v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · May 21, 2020
The complaint must clearly state what each individual defendant did to violate the plaintiff’s civil rights. See Bennett v. … Further, “a denial of a grievance, by itself without any connection to the violation of constitutional rights alleged by the plaintiff, does not establish personal participation under § 1983.” Gallagher v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownGreat American Assurance Company v. Sooner Emergency Services, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · Aug 13, 2025
First, SES maintains that late charges qualify as “interest,” which is not to be included in the calculation of the jurisdictional amount. … Presuming the late charges do qualify as interest, they are nonetheless appropriately considered in the amount in controversy in this case.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · Mar 4, 2025
with business relations/contracts” and violated: the Civil Rights Act of 1964; the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution; the Privileges and Immunities … Due process requires that a defendant 9 “purposefully established minimum contracts within the forum State” and that “the assertion of personal jurisdiction
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna