Case law

Vance v. Frisco

District Court, S.D. Ohio · May 31, 2024

See Beamon v. Brown, 125 F.3d 965, 967 (6th Cir. 1997); see also Jarrell v. Shulkin, No. 3:16-cv-95, 2018 WL 1901681, at *3 (S.D. Ohio April 20, 2018). … Plaintiff’s potential avenue of relief would be through administrative channels, first by appealing a denial of benefits to the Board of Veterans Appeals, and, if unsuccessful, to the Court of Veterans Appeals.

Ayers v. Hagedorn

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 3, 2025

Specifically, the Motion seeks to consolidate the above captioned cases: Scott v. The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company et al, Case No. 2:24-cv-03636 (S.D. Ohio) (the “Scott Action”), and Ayers v. …  Co-Lead Counsel for plaintiffs in this Consolidated Action shall be: o THE BROWN LAW FIRM, P.C.

Guernsey Memorial Hospital v. Sullivan

796 F. Supp. 283 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 30, 1992

The parties also agree that current GAAPs, represented by Opinion No. 26 of the Accounting Principles Board and Statement No. 76 of the Financial Accounting Standards Board, would recognize the entire cost of the refunding … Luke’s Hospital v.

Board of Trustees of the Ohio Laborers Benefits v. Stevens & Sons Builders, LLC

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jun 4, 2026

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION Board of Trustees of the Ohio Laborers Benefits, Plaintiff, Case No. 2: … 25-cv-1381 V.

Sander v. Providence Hospital

483 F. Supp. 895 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Aug 13, 1979

The Court in Guaranty Trust Co. v. … Citing Hanna v. Plumer, supra. In view of the foregoing, the motion of defendant Providence Hospital is hereby GRANTED. Plaintiff and defendants are each directed to designate a person to sit upon the arbitration board.

Child World, Inc. v. South Towne Centre, Ltd.

634 F. Supp. 1121 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Apr 17, 1986

Brown v. Palzes, 39 Ohio Misc. 155 , 317 N.E.2d 262 , 68 Ohio Op.2d 386 (Cuyahoga Cty.Ct.C.P.1973) and State ex rel. Brown v. … Brown v. Zayre of Ohio, 41 Ohio Misc. 117 , 324 *1130 N.E.2d 186, 70 Ohio Op.2d 268 (Cuyahoga Cty.Ct.C.P.1974); State ex rel. Brown v.

R. v. Village Of Middleport Ohio

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Sep 17, 2019

Browning v. Pendleton, 869 F.2d 989, 992 (6th Cir. 1989) (en banc); see Ohio Revised Code § 2305.10. … And Michelle R. cannot rely upon the theory of respondeat superior to impose liability on the Meigs County Board. Ridgeway v. Union County Comm'rs, 775 F. Supp. 1105, 1109-10 (S.D.

Orick v. Banziger

945 F. Supp. 1084 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Nov 8, 1996

(the “Board”). … Board of Educ. v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274, 287 , 97 S.Ct. 568, 576 , 50 L.Ed.2d 471 (1977); cf. Monks v.

Everett v. United States

492 F. Supp. 318 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jun 13, 1980

Brown, 348 U.S. at 112 , 75 S.Ct. at 143 , between the soldier and his superiors which is at the heart of Feres and “best explain^],” United States v. … Brown, 348 U.S. 110 , [ 75 S.Ct. 141 , 99 L.Ed. 139 ] (1954), and Hungerford v. United States, 192 F.Supp. 581 (N.D.

Pough v. DeWine

District Court, S.D. Ohio · May 24, 2021

Initially, to the extent Plaintiff seeks to sue the Ohio Parole Board as a distinct entity, “[t]he Ohio Parole Board is a section within the Ohio Parole Authority, a state agency.” See Latham v. … Children's Healthcare is a Legal Duty, Inc. v. Deters, 92 F.3d 1412, 1415 (6th Cir.1996). As explained in Brown v.

Williamson v. Warden, London Correctional Institution

District Court, S.D. Ohio · May 4, 2021

The parole board may increase the length of the post- release control. … Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. 161, 165 (1977), quoting North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U.S. 711, 717 (1969). The Double Jeopardy Clause was held to be applicable to the States through the Fourteenth Amendment in Benton v.

United States v. Consolidation Coal Co.

184 F. Supp. 2d 723 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jan 31, 2002

Head v. Jellico Hous. Auth, 870 F.2d 1117 , 1123 (6th Cir.1989) (quoting Hageman v. Signal L.P. Gas, Inc., 486 F.2d 479, 484 (6th Cir.1973)). See also Coe v. … A brown oil with an odor typical of aromatic organic compounds was detected in all samples of the waste pit borings.

Laufman v. Oakley Building & Loan Co.

72 F.R.D. 116 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Sep 8, 1976

. § 2000d, and regulations issued by the Federal Home Loan Bank Board, 12 C.F.R. 528 and 531. … Such appraisal forms are prohibited by the Federal Home Loan Bank Board (doc. 53 and Appendix U).

Local Union 212 International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Vacation Trust Fund v. Local 212 IBEW Credit Union

549 F. Supp. 1299 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Nov 1, 1982

In General Motors Corp. v. … In Franchise Tax Board v.

Kelley v. Chambers-Smith

District Court, S.D. Ohio · May 30, 2023

He claims that after being transferred to Belmont Correctional Institution, on February 8, 2023, he was gathering documents and making arrangements to retain an attorney for a scheduled April 1, 2023 parole board hearing … Pahssen v. Merrill Cmty. Sch. Dist., 668 F.3d 356, 367-68 (6th Cir. 2012) (quoting Newell v. Brown, 981 F.2d 880, 886 (6th Cir. 1992), in turn quoting Griffin v.

Reese v. Carmichael

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Nov 16, 2020

Reese brought a shareholder derivative action, on behalf of nominal Defendant Fifth Third Bancorp, against Fifth Third’s Board of Directors. (Doc. 1.) … Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. F.T.C., 710 F.2d 1165, 1180 (6th Cir. 1983).

Farkas v. OIL, CHEM. & ATOMIC WKRS. INT. UNION

422 F. Supp. 836 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Oct 7, 1976

FARKAS, Director of Region 9 of the National Labor Relations Board, for and on behalf of the National Labor Relations Board, Petitioner, v. … The issue presented by the petition has been framed as follows by one court, Kaynard v.

Potemra v. Ping

462 F. Supp. 328 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Dec 19, 1978

Shaw v. Board of Trustees, 396 F.Supp. 872 (D.Md., 1975); see generally Simard v. Board of Education, 473 F.2d 988 (CA2, 1973). The plaintiff also objects to the suspension letters from Dean Silver on two grounds. … Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471, 481 , 92 S.Ct. 2593, 2600 , 33 L.Ed.2d 484 (1972). 2 . This requirement presumes that the fact finding board or tribunal will be impartial. Cf. Brouillette v.

United States v. Holtzhauer

463 F. Supp. 2d 742 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Nov 21, 2006

Farroni v. Farroni, 862 F.2d 109, 112 (6th Cir.1988). … United States v. Krosky, 418 F.2d 65, 67 (6th Cir.1969).

Tousey v. Park National Bank

411 F. Supp. 751 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Nov 13, 1975

Marie v. … See also Simmons v. American Budget Plan, Inc., 386 F.Supp. 194, 201 (E.D.La.1974). Treating the trustee’s appeal as properly before this Court, then, his assignment of error is overruled.