Case law

Guernsey Memorial Hospital v. Sullivan

796 F. Supp. 283 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 30, 1992

The parties also agree that current GAAPs, represented by Opinion No. 26 of the Accounting Principles Board and Statement No. 76 of the Financial Accounting Standards Board, would recognize the entire cost of the refunding … Luke’s Hospital v.

Cytec Industries, Inc. v. B.F. Goodrich Co.

196 F. Supp. 2d 644 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Apr 5, 2002

Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 247-48 , 106 S.Ct. 2505 , 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986) (emphasis added). See generally Booker v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Co., Inc., 879 F.2d 1304, 1310 (6th Cir.1989). … See Inland Refuse Transfer Co. v. Browning-Ferris Indus. of Ohio, Inc., 15 Ohio St.3d 321 , 474 N.E.2d 271, 272 (1984). It is the province of the court to determine if a contract is ambiguous. See Lincoln Elec. Co. v.

Huber v. Ohio

920 F. Supp. 2d 858 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Sep 27, 2012

Neitzke, 490 U.S. at 327-28 , 109 S.Ct. 1827 ; Brown v. Bargery, 207 F.3d 863, 866 (6th Cir.2000). … Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir.1989). The complaint “must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to ‘state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.’ ” Ashcroft v.

Antioch Litigation Trust v. McDermott Will & Emery LLP

500 B.R. 755 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Oct 28, 2013

Rodriguez v. … Natco Indus., Inc. v. Fed. Ins. Co., 69 B.R. 418 (S.D.N.Y.1987).

Campbell v. Chambers Smith

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Oct 15, 2021

/d. at PAGEID # 113; see also Browning v. Pendleton, 869 F.2d 989, 992 (6th Cir. 1989) (statute of limitations for 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim in Ohio is two years (citing Ohio Rev. Code § 2305.10)). … See, e.g., Holland v.

Federal Property Management Corp. v. Harris

448 F. Supp. 560 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 15, 1978

For the reasons set forth in Kent Farms Co. v. Hills, supra; Cole v. Lynn, supra; and Brown v. Lynn, 385 F.Supp. 986 (N.D.Ill.1974), defendants’ policy is far superior to foreclosure. … Disposition of the remaining issues in this action is STAYED pending the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Ross v. Harris and Abrams v. Harris.

United States v. Washington

266 F. Supp. 2d 781 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jun 6, 2003

266 F.Supp.2d 781 (2003) UNITED STATES of America, v. Dennis WASHINGTON and Ebony Brown. Case No. CR2-03-009. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. June 6, 2003. *782 Kevin W. … V. Conclusion For the foregoing reasons, Defendant Ebony Brown's Motion to Suppress and Defendant Dennis Washington's Motion to Suppress are GRANTED.

United States v. Consolidation Coal Co.

184 F. Supp. 2d 723 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jan 31, 2002

Head v. Jellico Hous. Auth, 870 F.2d 1117 , 1123 (6th Cir.1989) (quoting Hageman v. Signal L.P. Gas, Inc., 486 F.2d 479, 484 (6th Cir.1973)). See also Coe v. … A brown oil with an odor typical of aromatic organic compounds was detected in all samples of the waste pit borings.

Brinkman v. Gilligan

85 F. Supp. 2d 761 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jun 17, 1999

Id. at 689-90. 29 In Rockford Board of Education v. … In Akron Board of Education v.

Bashir v. Supreme Court of Ohio

501 F. Supp. 288 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Nov 20, 1980

Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners, 353 U.S. 232, 239 , 77 S.Ct. 752, 756 , 1 L.Ed.2d 796 (1957); Ross v. Reda, 510 F.2d 1172 (6th Cir. 1975), cert. denied 423 U.S. 892 , 96 S.Ct. 190 , 46 L.Ed.2d 124 (1975). … Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners, supra. A bar examination tests those skills and knowledge which have a logical, apparent relationship to those necessary to the practice of law. Tyler v.

Meade v. Pension Appeals & Review Committee

760 F. Supp. 671 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Apr 2, 1991

Section 1113 (a), Section 413(a). 5 See, Cowden v. Montgomery Co. Soc. For Cancer Control, 591 F.Supp. 740, 754 (N.D.Ohio 1984), citing, Davidson v. Cook, 567 F.Supp. 225, 235 (E.D.Va.1983); Livolsi v. … See, Daniel v. Eaton, 839 F.2d 263 , 266 (6th Cir.1988); Blakeman v. Mead Containers, 779 F.2d 1146, 1149 (6th Cir.1985); Moore v. Reynolds Metal Co.

Hall v. Chambers Smith

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Sep 2, 2021

Although pro se complaints are to be construed liberally, Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972), “basic pleading essentials” are still required, Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989). … Browning v. Pendleton, 869 F.2d 989, 991 (6th Cir. 1989) (noting that Ohio’s two-year statute of limitations for personal injury claims applies to § 1983 actions).

Roemer v. City of Dayton

496 F. Supp. 2d 873 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jul 6, 2007

The interim team was commanded by Lieutenant Robert Chabali, and Defendant Michael Brown (“Brown”) was a supervisor. … See Brooks v.

Edwards v. University of Dayton

142 F. Supp. 3d 605 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Sep 15, 2015

Neitzke, 490 U.S. at 327-28 , 109 S.Ct. 1827 ; Brown v. Bargery, 207 F.3d 863, 866 (6th Cir.2000). … Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir.1989). Specifically, the complaint “must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to ‘state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.’” Ashcroft v.

Board of Trustees of the Southern Ohio Painters Health & Welfare Fund v. Sixth Region Remodeling, LLC

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Aug 19, 2025

P. 56(a); see also Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322 (1986); Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 247-48 (1986). … Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574, 587 (1986).

Child World, Inc. v. South Towne Centre, Ltd.

634 F. Supp. 1121 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Apr 17, 1986

Brown v. Palzes, 39 Ohio Misc. 155 , 317 N.E.2d 262 , 68 Ohio Op.2d 386 (Cuyahoga Cty.Ct.C.P.1973) and State ex rel. Brown v. … Brown v. Zayre of Ohio, 41 Ohio Misc. 117 , 324 *1130 N.E.2d 186, 70 Ohio Op.2d 268 (Cuyahoga Cty.Ct.C.P.1974); State ex rel. Brown v.

Harter v. Franklin County Department of Sanitary Engineers

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Sep 11, 2024

(quoting Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. F.T.C., 710 F.2d 1165, 1180 (6th Cir. 1983)). … Shane Grp., Inc., 825 F.3d at 306 (citing Brown & Williamson, 710 F.2d at 1176).

AMCA International Corp. v. Krouse

482 F. Supp. 929 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Dec 21, 1979

At the meeting on September 14, 1979, the board further authorized Mr. … Pennsylvania v. Nelson, 350 U.S. 497 , 76 S.Ct. 477 , 100 L.Ed. 640 (1956); Hines v. Davidowitz, 312 U.S. 52 , 61 S.Ct. 399 , 85 L.Ed. 581 (1941).

Brickles v. Village of Phillipsburg, Ohio

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Sep 20, 2019

The Village Defendants argue that the Report does not properly apply Board of Cnty. Com’rs of Bryan Cnty., Okl. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397 (1997) to link Defendant Justin W. … Corp. v.

Ayers v. Hagedorn

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 3, 2025

Specifically, the Motion seeks to consolidate the above captioned cases: Scott v. The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company et al, Case No. 2:24-cv-03636 (S.D. Ohio) (the “Scott Action”), and Ayers v. …  Co-Lead Counsel for plaintiffs in this Consolidated Action shall be: o THE BROWN LAW FIRM, P.C.