Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersohsd

5,831 results

1.44s

  • Craig v. Columbus City Schools

    760 F. Supp. 128 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 14, 1991

    As the court stated in Wohl v. Cleveland Board of Education, 741 F.Supp. 688 (N.D. Ohio 1990), the plain meaning of § 2744.09(E) could not be more clear. … Co. v. Eriksson Eng'g Ltd., 6 Ohio St.3d 31 , 451 N.E.2d 228 (1983). 2 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • American Civil Liberties Union of Ohio v. Taft

    217 F. Supp. 2d 842 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Aug 26, 2002

    Automobile Workers v. Brock, 477 U.S. 274, 281-82 , 106 S.Ct. 2523 , 91 L.Ed.2d 228 (1986); Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising Comm’n, 432 U.S. 333, 342-43 , 97 S.Ct. 2434 , 53 L.Ed.2d 383 (1977); Warth v. … Brown Group, Inc., 517 U.S. 544, 552-54 , 116 S.Ct. 1529 , 134 L.Ed.2d 758 (1996) (explaining the trilogy of cases, Brock, Hunt and Warth, supra, from which the doctrine of associational standing emerged); NAACP v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bailey v. Ohio State University

    487 F. Supp. 601 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Apr 10, 1980

    Healthy City Board of Education v. … Unlike some local school boards, the university has no taxing power. See Mt. Healthy City Board of Education v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274, 280 , 97 S.Ct. 568, 572 , 50 L.Ed.2d 471 (1977).

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Connole v. Norfolk & W. Ry. Co.

    216 F. 823 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Sep 2, 1914

    of Awards, had voluntarily accepted the provisions of such act by filing their written acceptances thereof with such board, and unless such acceptances had also been approved by such board; and that in that event the defendant … Eudlich, Interpretation of Statutes, _ § 33; Blake v. National Banks, 23 Wall. 307 , 23 L. Ed. 119 ; United States v. Delaware & Hudson Co., 213 U. S. 366, 414 , 29 Sup. Ct. 527, 53 L. Ed. 836 ; State v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Leta v. Hamilton Job & Family Services

    District Court, S.D. Ohio · Apr 5, 2023

    Hamilton County Defendants None of the Hamilton County Defendants—the Hamilton County Board of Commissioners, Hamilton County JFS, Sandi Webster, Samantha Fleckenstein, and Bailee Brown—can … Comm’rs of Bryan Cnty. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403 (1997).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Johnson v. JPMorgan Chase & Co.

    922 F. Supp. 2d 658 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Feb 6, 2013

    Brown v. BKW Drywall Supply, Inc., 305 F.Supp.2d 814, 824 (S.D.Ohio 2004). … Brown, 305 F.Supp.2d at 829 .

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Wilson v. City of Dayton

    14 F. Supp. 3d 900 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jan 6, 2014

    Neitzke, 490 U.S. at 327-28 , 109 S.Ct. 1827 ; Brown v. Bargery, 207 F.3d 863, 866 (6th Cir.2000). … Browning v. Pendleton, 869 F.2d 989, 992 (6th Cir.1989) (en banc); see also Anderson v. City of E.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • United States v. Charrington

    285 F. Supp. 2d 1063 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Aug 5, 2003

    Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47 , 50- *1067 51, 99 S.Ct. 2637 , 61 L.Ed.2d 357 (1979) (the three-part Brown balancing test). Procedures established at military installations are deserving of special consideration. … United States v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Pierre v. University of Dayton

    143 F. Supp. 3d 703 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Oct 19, 2015

    that may affect the board’s findings. … The JRC may affirm the board’s findings; order that the board be reconvened to consider new evidence; order that a new board be convened or that the student conduct process start back at an earlier point; or reverse the board

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Inc. v. Evans

    440 F. Supp. 414 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Aug 25, 1977

    See also Adler v. Board of Education, 342 U.S. 485 , 72 S.Ct. 380 , 96 L.Ed. 517 (1952), overruled in part on other grounds, Keyishian v. Board of Regents, 385 U.S. 589 , 87 S.Ct. 675 , 17 L.Ed.2d 629 (1967). … Braunfeld v. Brown, 366 U.S. 599, 603 , 81 S.Ct. 1144, 1446 , 6 L.Ed.2d 563 (1961).

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Welton v. Osborn

    124 F. Supp. 2d 1114 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Aug 15, 2000

    Thurman v. Yellow Freight Systems, Inc., 90 F.3d 1160 (6th Cir.1996); Matlock v. … Dlott’s denial of summary judgment to the School Board members on the basis of absolute legislative immunity. Canary v. Osborn, 211 F.3d 324 (6th Cir.2000). 5 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Radol v. Thomas

    534 F. Supp. 1302 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 16, 1982

    See James v. Gerber Products Co., 587 F.2d 324, 327 (6th Cir. 1978); Arber v. Essex Wire Corporation, 490 F.2d 414, 421 (6th Cir. 1974). See also Kohn v. … Ernst & Ernst v. Hochfelder, 425 U.S. 185, 199 , 96 S.Ct. 1375, 1383 , 47 L.Ed.2d 668 (1976). In Sante Fe Industries, Inc. v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Simmons v. Ohio Adult Parole Authority

    District Court, S.D. Ohio · May 17, 2023

    Frengler v. Gen. Motors, 482 F. App’x 975, 976–77 (6th Cir. 2012) (quoting Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989)). II. … Here, “Ohio does not give inmates a right to parole; the Board has authority to grant or deny a candidate’s application at its discretion.” Bailey v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Unicorp Financial Corp. v. First Union Real Estate Equity & Mortgage Investments

    515 F. Supp. 249 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Apr 13, 1981

    Mason County Medical Ass’n. v. … In Plant Industries v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Atkins v. Marshall

    533 F. Supp. 1324 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 15, 1982

    Atkins v. Denton, No. 79AP-450 at 2-3 (Ohio 10th App.Dist.1979). … Atkins v. Denton, 63 Ohio St.2d 192, 193 , 406 N.E.2d 1390 (1980). The focus of the Court of Appeals and the Ohio Supreme Court is on the prejudicial nature of the error by the Parole Board.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship Clerks v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.

    137 F. Supp. 653 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Nov 16, 1955

    In Hickman v. … Trusteed Funds, Inc., v. Dacey, 1 Cir., 160 F.2d 413, 414 (8). See also McClayton v. W. B. Cassell Co., D.C., 66 F.Supp. 165 . 4. Although Sec. 153 (p), Title 45 U.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Duffy v. United States

    343 F. Supp. 4 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Apr 12, 1972

    “For this reason and no other the petitioner has failed to bring himself within the ambit of those three decisions. [ Skemp, supra; Brown v. C. I. R., 180 F.2d 926 (3 Cir., 1950); and Felix v. C. I. … Van Zandt v. C. I.

    Reversed on other grounds by F. Paul Duffy and Virginia H. Duffy v. United States, 487 F.2d 282 (1973)Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Buckel v. Prentice

    410 F. Supp. 1243 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 15, 1976

    See, e. g., Lehman v. City of Shaker Heights, 418 U.S. 298 , 94 S.Ct. 2714 , 41 L.Ed.2d 770 (1974). … Justice Blackmun observed in the plurality opinion in Lehman v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Wampler v. Handwerk

    District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jul 19, 2022

    (“OAPA Board”). … Frengler v. Gen. Motors, 482 F. App’x 975, 976–77 (6th Cir. 2012) (quoting Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989)). III. ANALYSIS A.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Brinkman v. Gilligan

    557 F. Supp. 610 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jan 26, 1982

    The Board of Public Education of the City of Wilmington, 555 F.2d 373 (3rd Cir.1977); Oliver v. Kalamazoo Board of Education, 6 Cir., 576 F.2d 714 ; Claymont v. … Virginia 1971); Beckett v. The School Board of the City of Norfolk, 308 F.Supp. 1274 (E.D. Virginia 1969); Frimklin v. The Quitman County Board of Education, 288 F.Supp. 509 (N.D. Mississippi 1968). 6 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.