Case law

Concerned Citizens of Southern Ohio, Inc. v. Pine Creek Conservancy District

473 F. Supp. 334 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Aug 29, 1977

Cf., Sailors v. … school board.

Ohio, Department of Human Services v. Sullivan

789 F. Supp. 1395 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 31, 1992

In ICC v. … State’s Exhibit V, the affidavit of its expert, Dr.

Liberty Leasing Co. v. MacHamer

6 F. Supp. 2d 714 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · May 28, 1998

Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 248 , 106 S.Ct. 2505 , 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986); see also Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co. v. … to substantial deference from the courts, Martin v.

In Re Cardinal Health, Inc. Securities Litigation

550 F. Supp. 2d 751 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · May 5, 2008

Attorneys for objectors Ronald and Vondell Tyler, Susan Browne, and the Murphy Family foundation (collectively “the Murphy Group”) join Smith’s petition but only demand $3.7 million. III. … Bowling v. Pfizer, Inc., 102 F.3d 777, 779 (6th Cir.1996). An objector to a class-action settlement is not normally entitled to a fee award unless he confers a benefit on the class. Vizcaino v.

Thomas v. Farmer

573 F. Supp. 128 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 4, 1983

See, Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). … Pickering v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563, 574 , 88 S.Ct. 1731, 1737 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968).

BJS No. 2, Inc. v. City of Troy, Ohio

87 F. Supp. 2d 800 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jul 29, 1999

(Judgment Entry, Cook v. City of Troy Administrative Board of Appeals, Miami Cty. C.P. … In G & V Lounge, Inc. v.

Dunbar & Sullivan Dredging Co. v. John R. Jurgensen Co.

44 F.R.D. 467 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Sep 14, 1967

Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. United States, 201 F.2d 819 (6 Cir., 1953). … Augustus v. Board of Public Instruction, 306 F.2d 862, 868 (5 Cir., 1962) ; Smith v. Piper Aircraft Corp., 18 F.R.D. 169 (D.C.Pa., 1955).

Board of Education of the Springfield City School District v. HBH Technology Inc

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Apr 23, 2020

Renewable Energy Equipment Leasing, LLC v. Team Gemini, LLC, 2:14cv2687, 2017 WL 3475687, at *2 (S.D. … See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 949-50 (6th Cir. 1981).

Curia v. Pillsbury

54 F. Supp. 196 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Feb 15, 1944

United States v. Smith, D.C., 47 F.Supp. 607 ; Billings v. Truesdell, 10 Cir., 135 F.2d 505 ; Ex parte Billings, D.C., 46 F.Supp. 663 . Under the Selective Service Act 1917, 50 U. S.C.A. … Ex parte Billings, D.C., 46 F.Supp. 663 ; Billings v. Truesdell, 10 Cir., 135 F.2d 505 ; United States v. Smith, D.C., 47 F.Supp. 607 .

Norris v. Principi

254 F. Supp. 2d 883 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Feb 7, 2003

Relying heavily on United States Postal Service Board v. … Brown v. General Services Administration, 425 U.S. 820 , 96 S.Ct. 1961 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976).

Al-Sabur

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jul 6, 2026

Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007) 1 Although Columbus City Schools is named in the Amended Complaint, the parties stipulated that the proper defendant is the Columbus Board of Education. … Younis v.

Solis v. City of Columbus

319 F. Supp. 2d 797 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · May 26, 2004

A suit against Defendants Coleman, Brown, and Jackson solely in their official capacities is the equivalent of a lawsuit directed against the City. See Kentucky v. … Bd. of County Comm’rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 409 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997).

MICHAEL KING v. AARON LINDSEY, et al.

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jul 31, 2026

Plaintiff also names Brad Wise, Director of Recovery Services at TCI, and V. Brown, Office of Chief Legal Counsel, as defendants. Id. … Brown v. Mahlman, 2024 WL 248580, ¶ 10 (S.D. Ohio 2024) (Litkovitz, M.J.) (adopted by Brown v. Mahlman, 2024 WL 1340261 (S.D. Ohio 2024)) (citing Maben v. Thelen, 887 F.3d 252, 264 (6th Cir. 2018)).

Board of Education of the Springfield City School District v. HBH Technology Inc

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Dec 4, 2019

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON BOARD OF EDUCATION … Rowland v. California Men’s Colony, 506 U.S. 194, 201-02 (1993); Doherty v. American Motors Corp., 728 F.2d 334, 340 (6th Cir. 1984) (“[A] corporation cannot appear in federal court except through an attorney.”).

Thompson v. Midwest Foundation Independent Physicians Ass'n

117 F.R.D. 108 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Sep 4, 1987

Goff v. Kroger Co., 647 F.Supp. 87 (S.D.Ohio 1986); Foltzer v. Lodge & Shipley, 636 F.Supp. 843 (S.D.Ohio 1986). To rule otherwise would be unjust to the litigants who practice in this Court. … BROWN, CUMMINS & BROWN CO., L.P.A, 3500 Carew Tower, 441 Vine Street Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 513-381-2121 13) The approved class representatives in this class action are: John A.

Craig v. Columbus City Schools

760 F. Supp. 128 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 14, 1991

As the court stated in Wohl v. Cleveland Board of Education, 741 F.Supp. 688 (N.D. Ohio 1990), the plain meaning of § 2744.09(E) could not be more clear. … Co. v. Eriksson Eng'g Ltd., 6 Ohio St.3d 31 , 451 N.E.2d 228 (1983). 2 .

Western Union Tel. Co. v. Poe

61 F. 449 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Apr 23, 1894

Farrington v. Tennessee, 95 U. S. 686 , 687; Watson v. Spratley, 10 Exch. 236; People v. Commissioners, 4, Wall. 244; Union Bank v. State, 9 Yerg. 490 ; Cook v. City of Burlington, 59 Iowa, 251 , 13 N. W. 113 . … In Telegraph Co. v.

Paul v. Rawlings Sporting Goods Co.

123 F.R.D. 271 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Nov 8, 1988

One, Marvin Lumber & Cedar Co. v. … See Williams v. TWA, Inc., 588 F.Supp. 1037 (W.D.Mo.1984).

American Civil Liberties Union of Ohio v. Taft

217 F. Supp. 2d 842 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Aug 26, 2002

Automobile Workers v. Brock, 477 U.S. 274, 281-82 , 106 S.Ct. 2523 , 91 L.Ed.2d 228 (1986); Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising Comm’n, 432 U.S. 333, 342-43 , 97 S.Ct. 2434 , 53 L.Ed.2d 383 (1977); Warth v. … Brown Group, Inc., 517 U.S. 544, 552-54 , 116 S.Ct. 1529 , 134 L.Ed.2d 758 (1996) (explaining the trilogy of cases, Brock, Hunt and Warth, supra, from which the doctrine of associational standing emerged); NAACP v.

Allen v. Leis

154 F. Supp. 2d 1240 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jun 19, 2001

Id.; see also Board of County Comm’rs of Bryan County v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 4024103 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997). … Board of Governors of Federal Reserve Sys. v. DLG Fin.