Case law

Davie v. Wingard

958 F. Supp. 1244 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 6, 1997

Davie that the Board’s decision would be reviewed, and that Mr. Davie would probably be removed from the PRIDE unit. Complaint § IV. However, the Board’s decision was upheld by Mr. Wingard, the Warden. Complaint § IV. … Brown, 867 F.2d 956, 958 (6th Cir.1989)). Once the defendant has raised the issue of qualified immunity, the burden is on the plaintiff to show that the defendants are not entitled to immunity.

United States v. Norris

501 F. Supp. 2d 1092 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · May 22, 2007

United States v. Brown, 667 F.2d 566, 568 (6th Cir.1982) (per curiam). B. Application 1. … Quoting Payne v.

King v. Lindsey

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jul 28, 2025

Frengler v. Gen. Motors, 482 F. App’x 975, 976-77 (6th Cir. 2012) (quoting Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989)). II. … Steve Barnes, Rules Infraction Board (RIB) chairperson at CCI; 3. Brad Wise, Director of Recovery Services at TCI; 4. V.

Timson v. Weiner

395 F. Supp. 1344 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Apr 15, 1975

In Bottone v. … Sparrow v. Goodman, 361 F.Supp. 566 (W.D.N.C.1973) with Borreca v. Fasi, 369 F.Supp. 906 (D.Hawaii 1974).

Cox v. The New York Racing Association

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Sep 2, 2025

“Just as Brown v. Board of Education held that ‘separate but equal’ is inherently unequal, pari-mutuel wagering that grants privileges to CAW bettors while denying them to the public is inherently unfair.” (Id.). … The question presented in Brown v.

Miller v. Blackwell

348 F. Supp. 2d 916 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Oct 27, 2004

See Okpalobi v. … V.

Bouquett v. Clemmer

626 F. Supp. 46 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jul 10, 1985

Hall v. Medical College of Ohio, 742 F.2d 299 (6th Cir.1984). Without question, the State Board of Pharmacy and the State Medical Board are agencies of the State of Ohio, as opposed to political subdivisions. … Leonard v. City of Frankfort Electric and Water Plant Board, 752 F.2d 189 , 194 n. 9 (6th Cir.1984).

Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. Federal Home Loan Bank

421 F. Supp. 384 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Sep 27, 1976

Landell v. … In Arnold Tours, Inc. v.

United States v. Ledbetter

137 F. Supp. 3d 1042 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Oct 2, 2015

Brown, Johnathan Holt, and Christopher V. Wharton. On April 2, 2015, the grand jury returned another Indictment that was later assigned as a separate case—Case Number 2:15-cr-080. … The third trial would involve the remaining seven defendants: Ishmael Bowers, Joseph Hill, DeShawn Smith, Lance Reynolds, Andre M., Brown, Jonathan Holt, and Christopher V. Warton. 3 (Id.).

United Food & Commercial Workers, Local Union 1099 v. City of Sidney

199 F. Supp. 2d 739 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 11, 2002

In support of that assertion, the Plaintiffs rely upon Ohio Revised Code § 3501.29, which requires boards of elections to provide a polling place for each precinct. … See Newell v. Brown, 981 F.2d 880, 886 (6th Cir.1992) (“To state a claim under § 1985(3), a complaint must allege both a conspiracy and some class-based discriminatory animus behind the conspirators’ action.”)

Bell v. Amcast Industrial Corp.

607 F. Supp. 486 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Apr 17, 1985

Franchise Tax Board v. … The Supreme Court rejected the same argument in Franchise Tax Board . The argument there was based on Avco Corp. v.

A. Stucki Co. v. Buckeye Steel Castings Co.

795 F. Supp. 847 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jun 19, 1991

Furthermore, Buckeye Steel did have a representative on RDFs board of directors until 1981, and did receive distributions from RDI. … Co. v. Dura Corp., 592 F.2d 346, 348 (6th Cir.1979); Intertech Licensing Corp. v. Brown & Sharpe Mfg. Co., 708 F.Supp. 1423, 1433 (D.Del.1989); Whitehall Corp. v.

Riley v. SNECMA, INC.

105 F. Supp. 2d 793 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Sep 20, 1999

See Henkel v. … See, e.g., Canter v.

Baier v. Community Home Health Care, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Aug 22, 2025

the Community Health Accreditation Program, Ohio Board of Nursing, and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (the “March 9 Texts”). … [Laura] Brown,” (Am. Compl., ¶ 19), the letter puzzlingly refers to Brown and Boggs in the third person. See Pl. Ex. C, PageID 46.

Wilson v. Brennan

213 F. Supp. 3d 934 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Sep 29, 2016

On March 1, 2009, Brown retired from USPS and Plaintiff allegedly had interest in assuming Brown’s former role, which would include a pay raise and more responsibility. 3 (Id.). … In October 2013, the Tour 3 Lead MDO EAS 24 became available for the first time since Brown’s retirement in 2009.

Fowler v. Browning

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Dec 27, 2022

See Adler v. … According to plaintiff, the conduct reports from Browning and other MACI staff members resulted in restrictive housing placement at various times, “RIB [Rules Infraction Board]” sanctions, and loss of commissary privileges

Campbell v. Chambers Smith

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Sep 3, 2021

Wells v. Brown, 891 F. 2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989). IV. … Browning v. Pendleton, 869 F.2d 989, 992 (6th Cir. 1989). That statute of limitations “begins to run when the plaintiff knows or has reason to know of the injury that is the basis of the action.” Scott v.

Air-Way Electric Appliance Corp. v. Archer

3 F.2d 669 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Dec 8, 1922

Co. v. … Cooley on Taxation, 1447; Charlestown v. County Com’rs, 109 Mass. 270 ; Dunnell Mfg. Co. v. Inhabitants of Pawtucket, 73 Mass. (7 Gray) 277 ; City of Wilmington v. Ricaud, 90 F. 214 , 32 C. C. A. 580 ; Brown v.

McGhee v. Light

384 F. Supp. 3d 894 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · May 15, 2019

Neitzke , 490 U.S. at 327 -28 , 109 S.Ct. 1827 ; Brown v. Bargery , 207 F.3d 863 , 866 (6th Cir. 2000). … Wells v. Brown , 891 F.2d 591 , 594 (6th Cir. 1989). II.

McGarry v. Lentz

9 F.2d 680 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Nov 28, 1925

In the ease of Cummings v. Supreme Council of Royal Arcanum (D. … Head v. Providence Ins. Co., 2 Cranch, 127, 167 , 2 L. Ed. 229 ; Barnitz v. Beverly, 163 U. S. 118 , 16 S. Ct. 1042 , 41 L. Ed. 93 .