Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersohsd

5,831 results

1.41s

  • Engle v. UHaul

    208 F. Supp. 3d 844 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Sep 19, 2016

    See MacDer-mid v. Discover Fin. … See Gamel v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • United States v. Longworth

    269 F. Supp. 971 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jun 7, 1967

    Berman v. Craig, 207 F.2d 888 , (3rd, 1953); United States v. Ransom, 223 F.2d 15 , (7th, 1955) ; Stain v. United States, 235 F.2d 339 , (9th, 1956) ; United States v. … “It is universally held that the Appeal Board considers matters of classification de novo and its classification is one of first instance, not a mere affirmance or reversal of the Local Board”. De Remer v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Fifth Third Mortgage Company v. Chicago Title Insurance Company

    758 F. Supp. 2d 476 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Dec 17, 2010

    See also Brown v. Guarantee Title & Trust/ARTA, No. 94-41, 1996 Ohio App. LEXIS 3812 , at *9 (Ohio App. … of Brown’s defense and when [the insurer] failed to meaningfully respond to [Brown's] claim for reimbursement of legal fees for a full eleven months before [Brown] eventually filed suit). 18 .

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Parents Defending Education v. Olentangy Local School District Board of Education

    District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jul 28, 2023

    Kasper v. School Board of St. Johns County, it held that the interpretation of the word “sex” set forth in Bostock does not apply to Title IX. … Brown, 347 U.S. at 494; 22 Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. 644, 675 (2015); cf. Charles R.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Bob Tatone Ford, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.

    140 F. Supp. 2d 817 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Sep 5, 2000

    In accordance with a provision in the franchise agreement, Tatone Ford appealed that decision to Ford’s Dealer Policy Board (“Policy Board”). … Brown v. Felsen, 442 U.S. 127, 131 , 99 S.Ct. 2205 , 60 L.Ed.2d 767 (1979). Id. at 462-63.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Wojton v. United States

    199 F. Supp. 2d 722 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 4, 2002

    While the Supreme Court has often tried to clarify Feres , it has left Brown wholly intact. For example, in United States v. … See, e.g., Brown v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • McGath v. Hamilton Local School District

    848 F. Supp. 2d 831 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jan 30, 2012

    Lester (Lester) in his official capacity only, and the Board of Education, Hamilton Local School District (Board). … See, Hood, 229 Fed.Appx. at 400 (citing Murray v. Board of Trustees, University of Louisville, 659 F.2d 77 (6th Cir.1981)).

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Abbington v. Dayton Malleable, Inc.

    561 F. Supp. 1290 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 15, 1983

    See Parker v. … See Humphrey v. Moore, 375 U.S. 335, 354 , 84 S.Ct. 363, 374 , 11 L.Ed.2d 370 (1964); Brown v. United Auto Workers, 689 F.2d 69, 71 (6th Cir.1982); Anderson v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • The City of Philadelphia Board of Pensions and Retirement v. Anderson

    District Court, S.D. Ohio · Nov 16, 2020

    E.W. v, Anderson, No. 2:20-cvy-05128 (S.D. Ohio); Massachusetts Laborers Pension Fund v, Jones, No. 2:20-cv-05237 (S.D. Ohio); The City of. Philadelphia Board of Pensions and Retirement v. … In addition to the monetary recovery, the New Senior Board agreed to amend the company’s bylaws and certificate of incorporation to improve board member independence.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Baseball at Trotwood, LLC v. Dayton Professional Baseball Club, LLC

    493 F. Supp. 2d 972 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Sep 6, 2005

    ATC Distribution Group, Inc. v. … Pol v. Pol, 705 So.2d 51, 53 (Fla.App.1997).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Armstead v. Baldwin

    District Court, S.D. Ohio · Dec 18, 2019

    Code § 307.01(A) designates the board of county commissioners as the agency to determine the necessity of jail construction does not mean that such board has any control over the operation of a county jail.” … Brown, 2008 WL 2397692, at *2 (citing Saunders v. McFaul, 593 N.E.2d 24, 28 (Ohio Ct. App. 1990)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Johnson v. Indian Hill Exempted Village School District Board Of Education

    District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jun 2, 2021

    Barrett School District Board of Education, Defendant. … United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge=s R&R (Doc. 25) have been filed.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Johnson v. Indian Hill Exempted Village School District Board Of Education

    District Court, S.D. Ohio · May 17, 2021

    BOARD OF EDUCATION, Defendant. … See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981).  4

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Culberson v. Doan

    125 F. Supp. 2d 252 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jan 1, 2001

    Id.; see also Board of County Comm’rs of Bryan County v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 402-403 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997). … Board of County Comm’rs of Bryan County v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 404 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997).

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Garrett v. The Ohio State University

    District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jun 23, 2020

    In re Knoxville News- Sentinel Co., Inc., 723 F.2d 470, 473–74 (6th Cir. 1983); see also Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. … Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 710 F.2d at 1179 (citations omitted).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • North ex rel. Chemed Corp. v. McNamara

    47 F. Supp. 3d 635 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Sep 19, 2014

    Nor does the fact that the shareholders were unable to negotiate for a specific forum negate the consent provided to the board to adopt such a bylaw. See Carnival Cruise Lines v. … See City of Providence v.

    Cited 35 timesPublished
  • Snyder-Hill v. The Ohio State University

    District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jun 23, 2020

    In re Knoxville News- Sentinel Co., Inc., 723 F.2d 470, 473–74 (6th Cir. 1983); see also Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. … Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 710 F.2d at 1179 (citations omitted).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Mitchell Ex Rel. Mitchell v. Walter

    538 F. Supp. 1111 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · May 14, 1982

    Plaintiffs allege that exhaustion would be futile in this case because the Ohio State Board of Education has already determined that the local boards of education need not provide 24-hour residential placement to. any handicapped … Novotny, 442 U.S. 366 , 99 S.Ct. 2345 , 60 L.Ed.2d 957 (1979), and Brown v. GSA, 425 U.S. 820 , 96 S.Ct. 1961 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976). Cf. Middlesex Cty. Sewerage Authority v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Mincy v. Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center

    715 F. Supp. 2d 770 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · May 26, 2010

    Smith v. Leggett, 220 F.3d 752, 760 (6th Cir.2000). … Collins v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • McDowell v. The Board of Trustees for Perry Township, Stark County, Ohio

    District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 11, 2025

    Marbley : THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FOR : Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. … Co. v. Taylor, 286 F.2d 782 (6th Cir.)). That said, the court in Baker v. City of Detroit, 217 F.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.