Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersohsd

5,831 results

1.55s

  • Burns v. Jacor Broadcasting Corp.

    128 F. Supp. 2d 497 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jan 19, 2001

    See Brown v. State of Tennessee, 693 F.2d 600, 603 (6th Cir.1982). The Court notes that Plaintiff did not assert a claim of failure to promote in the Amended Complaint. In Price Waterhouse v. … Fresenius U.S.A., Inc., 978 F.Supp. 718, 733 (N.D.Ohio 1997); Brown v. ASD Computing Center, 519 F.Supp. 1096, 1116 (S.D.Ohio 1981).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Sorg Paper Co. v. Murphy

    111 F.R.D. 363 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jul 11, 1986

    The court held that the Board of Education was not and could not become an adverse party to the plaintiff with respect to the accident. … V.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • King v. City of Columbus

    District Court, S.D. Ohio · Dec 12, 2022

    In re Knoxville News- Sentinel Co., Inc., 723 F.2d 470, 473–74 (6th Cir. 1983); see also Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. … Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 710 F.2d at 1179 (citations omitted).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Pugh v. Erdos

    District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 27, 2024

    Shane Grp., 825 F.3d at 305 (quoting Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. FTC, 710 F.2d 1165, 1179 (6th Cir. 1983)). … Brown & Williamson, 710 F.2d at 1176.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Hawkins v. Cintas Corporation

    District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jan 27, 2021

    See VanPamel v. … This theory was rejected in Brown on behalf of Henny Penny Corp. Employee Stock Ownership Plan v. Wilmington Tr., N.A., No. 3:17-CV-250, 2018 WL 3546186 (S.D. Ohio July 24, 2018) (Rice, J.)

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Rice v. GREAT SENECA FINANCIAL CORP.

    718 F. Supp. 2d 900 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jun 22, 2010

    Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. Oklahoma, 273 U.S. 257, 259 , 47 S.Ct. 391 , 71 L.Ed. 634 (1927). … Upon dissolution, the corporation is managed by the board of directors solely for the purpose of liquidating the corporation’s assets and winding up its business and affairs.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Dodson v. Mohr

    District Court, S.D. Ohio · Feb 19, 2021

    P. 56(a); see Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322 (1986); Miller v. Maddox, 866 F.3d 386, 389 (6th Cir. 2017). … See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 949-50 (6th Cir. 1981).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • McGuire v. City of Moraine, Ohio

    178 F. Supp. 2d 882 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Sep 4, 2001

    [Board of Regents v.] Roth, 408 U.S. [564, 577, 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972) ]. … McLaurin v. Fischer, 768 F.2d 98, 102 (6th Cir.1985) (citing Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532, 538 , 105 S.Ct. 1487 , 84 L.Ed.2d 494 (1985); Goss v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Clark v. 3M Company

    District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jun 20, 2025

    (quoting Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. F.T.C., 710 F.2d 1165, 1180 (6th Cir. 1983)). … Shane Grp., Inc., 825 F.3d at 306 (citing Brown & Williamson, 710 F.2d at 1176).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • In re Louisville & C. Packet Co.

    95 F. 996 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · May 22, 1899

    Revised Statutes of the United Status, which, reads as follows: “The liability of the owner of any vessel, for any embezzlement, loss, or destruction, by any person, of any property, goods, or merchandise, shipped or put on board … Dill v. The Bertram, 7 Fed. Cas. 698 (No. 3,910); Constable v. Steamship Co., 154 U. S. 51, 62 . 14 Sup. Ct. 1062; 2 Gould & T. Notes Rev. St. U. S. p. 535; In re Goodrich Transp. Co., 26 Fed. 715 ; In re Long Island N.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Robinson v. City of Cincinnati

    District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jul 7, 2022

    Ludwig v. Board of Trustees, 123 F.3d 404, 410 (6th Cir. 1997) (internal citations omitted). The City maintains that Robinson has not adequately alleged statements which were “stigmatizing.” … See e.g., Seeley v. Board of Commis, 654 F.Supp. 1309, 1312 (D.Colo. Mar. 9, 1987) (criminal jury trial gave plaintiff the required opportunity to clear his name); Hoffman v. Kelz, No. 06–C–153–C, 2007 U.S.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Shank v. State Of Ohio

    District Court, S.D. Ohio · Nov 18, 2024

    According to plaintiff, he was again attacked by inmates at the direction of staff, was targeted and retaliated against, had his property given away, deprived of due process in a Rules Infraction Board hearing, subjected … See, e.g., Browning v. Pendleton, 869 F.2d 989, 992 (6th Cir. 1989) (holding that the “appropriate statute of limitations for 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights actions arising in Ohio is contained in Ohio Rev.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. United Ass'n of Journeymen & Apprentices of the Plumbing & Pipefitting Industry, Local Union No. 189

    311 F. Supp. 468 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Apr 14, 1970

    In the affidavit of Charles Gronback, a member of the Examining Board of Local 189, it is stated: As the facts stated herein show, the written examination [the journeyman examination given by the Board] is designed to and … In United States v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Erie R. Co. v. United States

    64 F. Supp. 162 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Dec 8, 1945

    United States v. Capital Transit Co., 65 S.Ct. 278 ; United States v. Griffin, Receiver, 303 U.S. 226 , 58 S.Ct. 601 , 82 L.Ed. 764 ; Baltimore & Ohio R. Co. v. United States, D.C. 15 F.Supp. 674 ; Thompson v. … Crichton v. United States, 323 U.S. 684 , 65 S.Ct. 559 ; Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 313 U.S. 146, 157, 158 , 61 S.Ct. 908 , 85 L.Ed. 1251 .

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Wright v. County of Franklin

    881 F. Supp. 2d 887 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jul 26, 2012

    Blackmore, 390 F.3d at 895 (internal quotations omitted) (quoting *898 Brown v. Bargery, 207 F.3d 863, 867 (6th Cir.2000)). … Board of Cnty. Commrs. of Bryan Cnty. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 405 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Molinaro v. TriHealth Hospital, Inc.

    District Court, S.D. Ohio · Oct 9, 2025

    Lloyd v. Midland Funding, LLC, 639 Fed. App’x 301, 304 (6th Cir. 2016). … (citing Alexander v. CareSource, 576 F.3d 551, 563 (6th Cir. 2009)).)

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • United States v. United Technologies Corp.

    255 F. Supp. 2d 779 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 6, 2003

    In Harrison v. … See Boyle v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Hicks

    District Court, S.D. Ohio · Apr 17, 2026

    See Marek v. Chesny, 473 U.S. 1, 7 (1985); see also, e.g., Hescott v. … Jordan v. City of Cleveland, 464 F.3d 584, 604 (6th Cir. 2006). “The result is what matters.” DiLaura v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Hammer v. Commissioner of Social Security

    District Court, S.D. Ohio · Sep 29, 2025

    See Jankovich v. Brown, 886 F.2d 867 (6th Cir. 1989). I. … Rodriquez v. Brown, 865 F.2d 739, 746 (6th Cir. 1989).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Isaac v. Conrad

    39 F. Supp. 2d 1025 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 9, 1999

    Ludwig v. Board of Trustees of Ferris State Univ., 123 F.3d 404 (6th Cir.1997). “A liberty interest in one’s reputation is implicated, therefore, only when five elements are satisfied.” Id. at 410 . … Ludwig, 123 F.3d at 410 (citing Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 573 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972); Chilingirian, 882 F.2d at 205).

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.