Case law

Waite, Schneider, Bayless & Chesley Co. v. Davis

253 F. Supp. 3d 997 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jun 3, 2015

V. … Procter & Gamble Co. v. Bankers Trust Co., 78 F.3d 219, 227 (6th Cir.1996). The Sixth Circuit “painstakingly discussed,” id., the grounds for sealing court papers in Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v.

Carelli v. Howser

733 F. Supp. 271 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Feb 14, 1990

The defendants are officials of the State of Ohio and Brown County charged with the enforcement of Ohio’s child support plan in Brown County which was adopted pursuant to Title IV-D. … Maine v.

Baldridge v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.

550 F. Supp. 1159 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Nov 8, 1982

In support of its position, the Union relies on United Parcel Service, Inc. v. … In Chevron Oil Co. v.

Carpenter v. Warden Ross Correctional Institution

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Apr 18, 2024

Burt v. Titlow, 571 U.S. 12, 20 (2013) (quoting Harrington v. Richter, 562 U.S. 86, 102 (2011)); see also Renico v. … V.

Walker

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jan 12, 2026

Frengler v. Gen. Motors, 482 F. App’x 975, 976–77 (6th Cir. 2012) (quoting Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989)). … (quoting Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d at 594). In particular, Plaintiff’s Complaint is devoid of any factual allegations against Defendants. Hawkins-Bivins v. Michigan, No. 2:25-CV-22, 2025 WL 464702, at *3 (W.D. Mich.

Efros v. Nationwide Corp.

98 F.R.D. 703 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Aug 5, 1983

FAIR AND ADEQUATE REPRESENTATION In Davis v. … In Guttmann v.

Wagner Mfg. Co. v. Cutler-Hammer, Inc.

84 F. Supp. 211 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Apr 8, 1949

Intra-division venue is governed by the rule recently adopted by this Court, which is, in part, as follows: ‘Any suit brought .against residents of the Counties of Adams, Brown, Butler, Clermont, Clinton, Hamilton, Highland … In Shaw v. Quincy Mining Co., 145 U.S. 444 , at pages 449-450, 12 S.Ct. 935, 937 , 36 L.Ed. 768 , the court says: “In Bank [of Augusta] v.

Neal v. Divya Jyoti Ltd.

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Apr 13, 2020

Jolson v. … (quoting Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. F.T.C., 710 F.2d 1165, 1180 (6th Cir. 1983)).

Banchy v. Republican Party of Hamilton County

707 F. Supp. 323 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 1, 1989

The four plaintiffs were elected as precinct committeemen of their respective precincts and the results were officially certified by the Hamilton County Board of Elections on May 19,1988. … California Republican Party v.

Preterm-Cleveland v. Himes

294 F. Supp. 3d 746 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 14, 2018

Corp. v. … Ctr. v.

Doe

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Nov 26, 2025

Doe v. Porter, 370 F.3d 558, 560 (6th Cir. 2004). … See J.W. v.

Hawkins v. Cintas Corporation

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jan 27, 2021

See VanPamel v. … This theory was rejected in Brown on behalf of Henny Penny Corp. Employee Stock Ownership Plan v. Wilmington Tr., N.A., No. 3:17-CV-250, 2018 WL 3546186 (S.D. Ohio July 24, 2018) (Rice, J.)

Gravitt v. General Electric Co.

680 F. Supp. 1162 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jan 22, 1988

United States v. Ekelman & Associates, Inc., 532 F.2d 545, 548 (6th Cir.1976); United States v. Ueber, 299 F.2d 310, 314-15 (6th Cir.1962). … Boisvert v. FMC Corporation, No. 86020163 (N.D.Cal. September 9, 1987) (holding that the 1986 amendments may not be applied retroactively to cut off a defense which existed under the old law); United States v.

Burns v. Jacor Broadcasting Corp.

128 F. Supp. 2d 497 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jan 19, 2001

See Brown v. State of Tennessee, 693 F.2d 600, 603 (6th Cir.1982). The Court notes that Plaintiff did not assert a claim of failure to promote in the Amended Complaint. In Price Waterhouse v. … Fresenius U.S.A., Inc., 978 F.Supp. 718, 733 (N.D.Ohio 1997); Brown v. ASD Computing Center, 519 F.Supp. 1096, 1116 (S.D.Ohio 1981).

Walker

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jan 12, 2026

Frengler v. Gen. Motors, 482 F. App’x 975, 976–77 (6th Cir. 2012) (quoting Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989)). … (quoting Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d at 594). In particular, Plaintiff’s Complaint is devoid of any factual allegations against Defendants. Hawkins-Bivins v. Michigan, No. 2:25-CV-22, 2025 WL 464702, at *3 (W.D. Mich.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. United Ass'n of Journeymen & Apprentices of the Plumbing & Pipefitting Industry, Local Union No. 189

311 F. Supp. 468 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Apr 14, 1970

In the affidavit of Charles Gronback, a member of the Examining Board of Local 189, it is stated: As the facts stated herein show, the written examination [the journeyman examination given by the Board] is designed to and … In United States v.

Brooks v. Butler County

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Nov 16, 2021

Univ. of Texas v. Camenisch, 451 U.S. 390, 395 (1981). … Mather v. Springfield Twp., No. L-94-196, 1995 WL 302307, at *3 (Ohio App. May 19, 1995); see also Musto v. Lorain Cty.

Landers v. Department of the Air Force

257 F. Supp. 2d 1011 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 7, 2003

, Inc., v. … Co. v.

Securities & Exchange Commission v. Davis

689 F. Supp. 767 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 29, 1988

Robert Davis, a Columbus resident, was chairman of the board of Orange-co, Inc., a publicly held Delaware corporation with offices located in Columbus, Ohio. … In Bender v.

Pappas v. Bethesda Hospital Ass'n

861 F. Supp. 616 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jun 29, 1994

Sav. & Loan Ass’n v. … See Kent v.