Case law

Wilson v. Ancestry.com LLC

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Feb 14, 2024

Shane Grp., 825 F.3d at 305 (quoting Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. F.T.C., 710 F.2d 1165, 1180 (6th Cir. 1983)). … See Lucid Health, Inc. v.

Community Refugee and Immigration Services v. Petit

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Feb 20, 2020

federal facilities and board commercial domestic flights. (Statement Stipulated Facts J 6, ECF No. 18, hereinafter “Stip. Facts.”) … Brown represented immigrants in a previous class action in the Northern District of Ohio. (d.; see also Ex. 16, 1-2, 7.) Ms. Brown and Ms.

Overlook Mutual Homes, Inc. v. Spencer

666 F. Supp. 2d 850 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jul 16, 2009

The members operate Overlook through an elected Board of Trustees (“Board”), which is authorized to adopt rules and regulations. … See Howard v.

Britton v. Mountain Run Solutions, LLC

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Aug 30, 2022

Brown v. Halsted Fin. Servs., LLC, No. 3:12-cv-308, 2013 WL 693168 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 26, 2013) (citing Antoine v. Atlas Turner, Inc., 66 F.3d 105, 110 (6th Cir. 1995)). … Brown, 2013 WL 693168 at *6 (citing Wooldridge v. Marlene Industries Corp., 898 F.2d 1169, 1177 (6th Cir. 1990)).

Kineon v. New Mary Houston

69 F. 362 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jul 10, 1895

The Ann, Lush. 55; The North American, Swab. 358; The Haswell, Browning & L. 247. See, also, The Hochung and The Lapwing, 7 App. Cas. 512. … C. 1, 7; The Marpesia, Id. 212; Vennall v. Garner, 1 Cromp. & M. 21; The City of Antwerp and The Friedrich, Inman v. Reck, L. R. 2 P. C. 25,—and illustrates the principle by a statement of other eases.

Sorg Paper Co. v. Murphy

111 F.R.D. 363 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jul 11, 1986

The court held that the Board of Education was not and could not become an adverse party to the plaintiff with respect to the accident. … V.

Pettus v. Warden, Franklin Medical Center

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 20, 2020

Pettus-Brown v. Lisath, Case No. 15-4330 (6th Cir. May 24, 2016)(unreported; copy at ECF No. 72 in prior case), cert. denied, 137 S. Ct. 378 (2016). … Pettus-Brown v. Cooper, Case No. 15-4380 (6th Cir. Jun. 8, 2016)(unpublished). The conclusory averments at the end of the Affidavit add nothing.

Woods v. City of Dayton, Ohio

574 F. Supp. 689 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Feb 4, 1983

Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c); Board of Education v. Pico, 457 U.S. 853 , 102 S.Ct. 2799, 2806 , 73 L.Ed.2d 435 (1982); Atlas Concrete Pipe, Inc. v. Au & Son, Inc., 668 F.2d 905, 908 (6th Cir.1982). A. … Board of Regents v. Tomanio, 446 U.S. 478, 483 , 100 S.Ct. 1790, 1794 , 64 L.Ed.2d 440 (1980); Kilgore v. City of Mansfield, 679 F.2d 632 (6th Cir. 1982) (per curiam); Sell v. Price, 527 F.Supp. 114,116 (S.D.Ohio 1981).

Wampler v. Handwerk

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jan 5, 2022

See Hill v. … Whalen v. United States, 445 U.S. 684, 689 n.4 (1980); see also Austin v.

Burger v. United States

748 F. Supp. 1265 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Oct 19, 1990

Board of Pardons v. Allen, 482 U.S. 369, 374 , 107 S.Ct. 2415, 2418 , 96 L.Ed.2d 303 (1987). The administrative decision to grant release on parole presents “sensitive choices”. Greenholtz v. … Berkovitz v.

Estate of Renato Marti v. Rice

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jul 19, 2022

Shane Grp., Inc. v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Mich., 825 F.3d 299, 305 (6th Cir. 2016) (quoting Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. F.T.C., 710 F.2d 1165, 1179 (6th Cir. 1983)). See also Nixon v. … Lipman v. Budish, 974 F.3d 726, 753 (6th Cir. 2020) (quoting Brown & Williamson, 710 F.2d at 1180-81).

Parker v. Local 413, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers

501 F. Supp. 440 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · May 21, 1980

Kister v. Ohio Board of Regents, 365 F.Supp. 27 (S.D.Ohio 1973), aff’d., 414 U.S. 1117 , 94 S.Ct. 855 , 38 L.Ed.2d 747 (1974). … Glover v. St.

National Acceptance Co. of America v. Bathalter (In Re Bathalter)

123 B.R. 568 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Dec 20, 1990

Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242 , 106 S.Ct. 2505 , 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986), see also Celotex Corp. v. … Indeed, this Court notes that the Supreme Court in Brown v.

Reed v. Wehrmann

159 F. Supp. 2d 700 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 26, 2001

Finally, Defendants argue that there is no valid settlement agreement because neither the board of county commissioners, nor the children services board had approved, nor they have subsequently ratified, such an agreement … In Jennings v.

Sheetz, Inc. v. City of Centerville, OH

District Court, S.D. Ohio · May 15, 2025

(quoting Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. F.T.C., 710 F.2d 1165, 1180 (6th Cir. 1983)). … Shane Group, 825 F.3d at 306 (citing Brown & Williamson, 710 F.2d at 1176). II.

Puskas v. Delaware County, Ohio

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 24, 2022

When Officer Brown arrived, he joined Deputy Swick by Swick’s cruiser. (Ex. 39, Brown Body Camera, 8:00–8:17.) Together they attempted to reason with Mr. Puskas. (Id., 8:17–10:50.) Mr. … Brown v.

Mehlman v. Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Dec 16, 2021

Shane Grp., Inc. v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Mich., 825 F.3d 299, 305 (6th Cir. 2016) (quoting Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. F.T.C., 710 F.2d 1165, 1179 (6th Cir. 1983)). See also Nixon v. … Lipman v. Budish, 974 F.3d 726, 753 (6th Cir. 2020) (quoting Brown & Williamson, 710 F.2d at 1180-81).

Efros v. Nationwide Corp.

98 F.R.D. 703 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Aug 5, 1983

FAIR AND ADEQUATE REPRESENTATION In Davis v. … In Guttmann v.

Banchy v. Republican Party of Hamilton County

707 F. Supp. 323 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 1, 1989

The four plaintiffs were elected as precinct committeemen of their respective precincts and the results were officially certified by the Hamilton County Board of Elections on May 19,1988. … California Republican Party v.

Walker

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jan 12, 2026

Frengler v. Gen. Motors, 482 F. App’x 975, 976–77 (6th Cir. 2012) (quoting Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989)). … (quoting Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d at 594). In particular, Plaintiff’s Complaint is devoid of any factual allegations against Defendants. Hawkins-Bivins v. Michigan, No. 2:25-CV-22, 2025 WL 464702, at *3 (W.D. Mich.