Case law

United States v. General Electric

808 F. Supp. 584 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Dec 4, 1992

The phrase “reasonable attorney fees” has been defined by the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in Northcross v. Board of Education of Memphis City Schools, 611 F.2d 624 (6th Cir.1979). … The Court does note in passing that in the case of Venegas v.

AMCO Insurance v. Lauren-Spencer, Inc.

500 F. Supp. 2d 721 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jun 20, 2007

Co. v. … See Bailey v. V. & O Press Co., 770 F.2d 601, 604 (6th Cir.1985) (citing cases).

Santiago v. Meyer Tool Incorporated

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Aug 18, 2020

Id. at 305 (citing Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. … See Brown & Williamson, 710 F.2d at 1179. . . .

Piedmont Paper Products, Inc. v. American Financial Corp.

89 F.R.D. 41 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Dec 1, 1980

Brown’s motion to intervene as a party-defendant and counterclaimant (doc. 13). This motion is the subject of supporting, opposing and reply memoranda (docs. 15, 30, 34). … Alexander v. Hall, 64 F.R.D. 152, 157 (D.S.C.1974); see Penick v. Columbus Education Association, 574 F.2d 889 (6th Cir. 1978); Skillken and Co. v. City of Toledo, 528 F.2d 867 (6th Cir. 1975).

Graham v. The Exporter

10 F. Cas. 920 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 15, 1875

Thé case of Jameson v. The Regulus [Case No. 7,198]; the case of The Rovena [Id. 12,-090]; the case of The Crusader [Id. 3,456];- and that of Cloutman v. … In the case of Gifford v. Kolloch [Id. 5,409], and that of Coffin v.

CCS Construction Company, LLC v. Lotus Pad Liberty Center, LLC

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 16, 2021

Id. at 305 (citing Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. … See Brown & Williamson, 710 F.2d at 1179. . . .

Reich v. Youghiogheny and Ohio Coal Co.

858 F. Supp. 1381 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · May 13, 1994

The Administrative Law Judge’s award of benefits was affirmed on appeal by the Benefits Review Board. … On appeal, the Benefits Review Board affirmed the Administrative Law Judge’s decision.

Boddy v. Grech

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jun 6, 2025

(quoting Elrod v. Burns, 427 U.S. 347, 373 (1976) then citing Newsom v. … She has therefore waived a facial challenge to any Board policy as a basis for seeking a preliminary injunction. See McPherson v.

Thompson v. Community Insurance

213 F.R.D. 284 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Oct 7, 2002

Kleiner v. … Rutherford v.

Seifer v. PHE, Inc.

196 F. Supp. 2d 622 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 19, 2002

Brown v. Ames, 201 F.3d 654, 657 (5th Cir.2000). For example, in Fleet v. … In support of .that argument, Defendants cite to the Fifth Circuit’s decision in Brown, supra.

Boddy

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jul 7, 2026

Munaf v. Geren, 553 U.S. 674, 689 (2008) (citation modified). … Doe v. Cincinnati, 872 F.3d 393, 399 (6th Cir. 2017) (citing Planet Aid v. City of St. Johns, 782 F.3d 318, 323 (6th Cir. 2015)). III.

Foreman v. General Motors Corp.

625 F. Supp. 1048 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Aug 13, 1985

In Yeager v. … Reamsnyder v.

United States v. Daoud

976 F. Supp. 2d 945 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Apr 30, 2013

United States v. O’Connor, 321 F.Supp.2d 722, 729 (E.D.Va.2004), see also United States v. Navarrete, 667 F.3d 886, 887-88 (7th Cir.2012); United States v. Browne, 505 F.3d 1229, 1281 (11th Cir.2007). Cf. … Ward v. United States, 116 F.2d 135, 136-37 (6th Cir.1940). Should Defendant choose this option, the Court will endeavor to return the parties to the status quo ante in every *948 respect. McGee v.

Wright v. Terrill

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jun 13, 2025

So it was then—January 10, 2025—that the NCUA Board became a party to the state-court action as a matter of law. See FDIC v. N. … Bank v. Robert M.

Klein

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Oct 27, 2025

Rogers v. Stratton Indus., Inc., 798 F.2d 913, 915 (6th Cir. 1986); Courtney v. Smith, 297 F.3d 455, 459 (6th Cir. 2002). … Likewise, in Torp v.

Glaze v. Morgan

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Feb 3, 2023

Frengler v. Gen. Motors, 482 F. App’x 975, 976–77 (6th Cir. 2012) (quoting Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989)). B. … The complaint also includes allegations about plaintiff’s Rules Infraction Board (RIB) hearings and appeals.

Florence Urgent Care v. Healthspan, Inc.

445 F. Supp. 2d 871 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · May 2, 2006

Anderson, 477 U.S. at 247-48, 106 S.Ct. 2505 (emphasis added); see generally Booker v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Co., Inc., 879 F.2d 1304, 1310 (6th Cir.1989). … Justice White’s language does not suggest that a corporation whose shareholders or board are perceived to possess a racial identity could not be the victim of racial discrimination.

Straughter v. Eddy

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jun 8, 2023

Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989). … V.

Joiner v. Ohio Dep't of Transportation

949 F. Supp. 562 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Dec 19, 1996

See Hill v. Judson Retirement Community, 775 F.Supp. 1090, 1096 (N.D.Ohio 1991), Wheelwright v. Clairol, Inc., 770 F.Supp. 396, 401 (S.D.Ohio 1991), Brown v. ASD Computing Center, 519 F.Supp. 1096, 1116 (S.D.Ohio 1981). … Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 332 , 96 S.Ct. 893, 901 , 47 L.Ed.2d 18 (1976). An individual can have a "property” interest in continued employment. See Board of Regents v.

United States ex rel. Elliott v. Brickman Group Ltd.

845 F. Supp. 2d 858 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jan 12, 2012

Brown, a Brickman employee. Mr. … Thus, Defendant appears to be incorrect where it states that “the Brown Declaration stands unrebutted.” (Doc. 28, 2.)