Case law

Johnson, Jr. v. NaphCare, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Feb 2, 2022

Brown v. Komidar, 765 F.2d 144 (6th Cir. 1985). “[T]he due process rights of a [pretrial detainee] are at least as great as the Eighth Amendment protections available to a convicted prisoner.” City of Revere v. Mass. … Brown v. Komidar, 765 F.2d 144 (6th Cir. 1985).

General Electric Co. v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers

568 F. Supp. 1138 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Aug 10, 1983

In Mount Healthy City Board of Education v. … . -, 103 S.Ct. 2469 , 76 L.Ed.2d 667 (1983) and Mount Healthy City Board of Education v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274 , 97 S.Ct. 568 , 50 L.Ed.2d 471 (1977).

In Re National Century Financial Enterprises, Inc.

783 F. Supp. 2d 1003 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Apr 12, 2011

Board of Liquor Control, 135 N.E.2d 786, 787 (Ohio Ct.App.1955); Motorwerks, 371 B.R. at 291 n. 6; see also Collins v. Pioneer Title Ins. … In re Brown, 209 B.R. 874, 885 (Bankr.W.D.Tenn.1997).

Matthey v. KDI Corp.

699 F. Supp. 135 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Nov 4, 1988

Under the terms of the Agreement, a majority of the members of the KDI Board of Directors, including Matthey, resigned effective October 14, 1986. … In conjunction with the Agreement, the former members of KDI’s Board of Directors caused KDI notes to issue to KDI shareholders, other than the Impala/Ariadne Group.

Hawes v. Macy's Inc.

346 F. Supp. 3d 1086 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Sep 28, 2018

Sweeton v. Brown , 27 F.3d 1162 , 1169 (6th Cir. 1994) (quoting United States v. Siviglia, 686 F.2d 832 , 835 (10th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 918 , 103 S.Ct. 1902 , 77 L.Ed.2d 289 (1983) ). B. … Brown v. Hain Celestial Group, Inc. , 913 F.Supp.2d 881 , 890 (N.D. Cal. 2012) (citing several cases). "[T]he critical inquiry is whether there is sufficient similarity between the products purchased and not purchased."

Cincinnati Bengals, Inc. v. Thompson

553 F. Supp. 1011 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jan 5, 1983

Nicol v. Koscinski, 188 F.2d 537 (6th Cir.1951); Priess v. Fisherfolk, 535 F.Supp. 1271 (S.D.Ohio 1982). … In Nolde Brothers, Inc. v.

In re Luby

155 F. 659 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Apr 20, 1907

United States v. Bonham (D. C.) 31 Fed. 808 ; United States v. Rennecke (D. C.) 28 Fed. 847 . It is true that in United States v. Feigelstock, 14 Blatchf. 321 , Fed. Cas. … In Hill v. Myers, 46 Ohio St. 183 , 19 N.

Lavrov v. NCR Corp.

600 F. Supp. 923 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Apr 20, 1984

Rivas v. State Board for Community Colleges and Occupational Education, 517 F.Supp. 467, 470 (D.Colo. 1981). Id. at 1337-38 (footnote omitted). … A supervisory board, with six members each from management and employees, oversees NCR GmbH. (Reynolds Dep. at 11). NCR appointed Reynolds to the board, and it also appointed the other management members of that board.

N.B., a Minor, By her Parents, Natural Guardians, and Next Friends Dwan Davis (f/k/a Dwan Bray) and Aaron Bray v. HealthSource of Ohio, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jun 6, 2025

McFarland Plaintiffs, ; v. … See Smith v. Miami Valley Hosp., No. 3:23-CV-365, 2024 WL 3043314, at *3 (S.D.

McGee v. Suciu

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Sep 14, 2021

See Woodford v. Ngo, 548 U.S. 81 (2006). … V. CONCLUSION For the following reasons, Plaintiffs claims against Suciu are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

Burr v. City of Columbus

256 F. 261 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Oct 29, 1918

Co. v. McKell, 209 Fed. 514, 522 , 126 C. C. A. 336 (C. C. A. 6), and Wheeling & L. E. R. Co. v. Carpenter, 218 Fed. 273, 285 , 134 C. C. A. 69 (C. C. … , and thereby the case is brought within the principle of Metropolitan Water Board v.

Stewart v. Cheek & Zeehandelar, LLP

252 F.R.D. 384 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Sep 5, 2008

See Beamon v. Brown, 125 F.3d 965, 969 (6th Cir.1997); In re Gen’l Motors Corp. Pick-Up Truck Fuel Tank Prods. Liab. Litig., 55 F.3d 768, 784 (3d Cir.1995). … See e.g., Mace v.

Werner-Continental, Inc. v. Farkas

478 F. Supp. 815 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Oct 22, 1979

This action originally came before the Court upon the complaint of plaintiff Werner-Continental, Inc. seeking release of information from defendant National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) pursuant to the Freedom of Information … See Nationwide Building and Maintenance, Inc. v. Sampson, supra; Vermont Low Income Advocacy Council, Inc. v. Usery, supra.

Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Ass'n v. Arctic Express, Inc.

87 F. Supp. 2d 820 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 3, 2000

United States v. Haun, 124 F.3d 745, 750 (6th Cir.1997); see also Dana Corp. v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield Mut. of N. … -The Secretary or the Board, as applicable, may bring a civil action- (1) to enforce section 14103 of this title; or (2) to enforce this part, or a regulation or order of the Secretary or Board, as applicable, when violated

Oden v. Warden, North Central Corectional Complex

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jan 27, 2020

See ACundS, 5 F.3d at 1263; Javetz v. Board of Control, Grand Valley State Univ. 903 F. Supp. 1181. 1191 (W.D. Mich. 1995)(and cases cited therein); Charles A. … Brown v. Konteh, 567 F.3d 191, 205 (6th Cir. 2009). In a sufficiency of the evidence habeas corpus case, deference should be given to the trier- of-fact's verdict under Jackson v.

In Re Soult

97 B.R. 363 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 16, 1989

See In re Daniels, 51 B.R. 142 (Bkrtcy.S.D.Ohio, 1985) and In re Brown, 60 B.R. 983 (Bkrtcy.S.D.Ohio, 1986) in which a creditor in this situation was given a reasonable time to file a dischargeability complaint. … That court expressed its disappointment that Congress did not specifically overrule the exceptional circumstances rule of Robinson v.

Southern Ohio Coal Co. v. Office of Surface Mining Reclamation & Enforcement

831 F. Supp. 1324 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Aug 19, 1993

In Claridge House, Inc. v. U.S. … First cited is Board of Governors of Federal Reserve System v. MCorp Financial, Inc., — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 459 , 116 L.Ed.2d 358 (1991).

Rheinecker v. Forest Laboratories

826 F. Supp. 256 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jul 16, 1993

See Wing v. Anchor Media Ltd. of Texas, 59 Ohio St.3d 103, 113-14 , 570 N.E.2d 1095 (1991); Phung v. … Phung v. Waste Management, Inc., 23 Ohio St.3d 100, 103 , 491 N.E.2d 1114 (1986) (citing State ex rel. Clark v. Brown, 1 Ohio St.2d 121 , 205 N.E.2d 377 (1965)).

Higginbotham v. Ohio Department of Mental Health

412 F. Supp. 2d 806 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Sep 22, 2005

The evaluation was “meets expectations” across the board and had specific comments regarding Plaintiffs performance. 9. … See, e.g., Bronson v.

Pearson v. United Automobile Workers International Union

179 F. Supp. 3d 773 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Apr 12, 2016

(“CAC”) or Public Review Board (“PRB”). … Pearson also cites Vencl v.