Case law

Francis v. Pike County, Ohio

708 F. Supp. 170 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jul 13, 1988

In Gilmere v. City of Atlanta, 774 F.2d 1495 (11th Cir.1985), the defendant officers beat and shot the decedent. Finally, in Brown v. … Molton v. City of Cleveland, 839 F.2d 240, 243 (6th Cir.1988). See also Partridge v. Two Unknown Police Officers of Houston, 791 F.2d 1182, 1186-87 (5th Cir.1986); Roberts v.

United States v. Hedrick

207 F. Supp. 2d 710 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jun 21, 2002

United States v. … See United States v.

Former Frigidaire Employees Ass'n v. International Union of Electrical, Radio & MacHine Workers, Local 801

573 F. Supp. 59 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Oct 7, 1983

Conference Board, violated § 301 of the Labor-Management Relations Act (LMRA), 29 U.S.C. § 185 (breach of contract), and the duty of fair representation implied by federal labor law. … One of the Plaintiffs in this case, Lillie Henry, filed an unfair labor practice charge with the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) on October 19, 1982.

Vinson v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Oct 15, 2024

See Brown v. … Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d at 594.

Steele v. Neff

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jan 2, 2020

The document asks the Chairperson to “[s]tate the facts that explain the board’s decision.” (Id.) The Chairperson answered “[t]he Board believes the conduct report to be true and factual as written.” (Id.) … Frengler v. Gen. Motors, 482 F. App’x 975, 976–77 (6th Cir. 2012) (quoting Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989)). III.

Sprouse v. Mitchell

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Sep 5, 2024

Hopkins v. … Jones v. City of Fairlawn, No. 5:03-cv-1976, 2005 WL 3543970, at *1 (N.D. Ohio Dec. 28, 2005). When a pro se plaintiff offers only general objections, it “has the same effect[] as would a failure to object.” Howard v.

Ratterman v. United States

157 F. Supp. 493 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Dec 18, 1957

Willey Lumber Company shall be on the basis of stumpage cost of $4, less per thousand feet board measure than whatever the current stumpage price may be at the time. … Ratterman v. Commissioner (July 6, 1948) Memo.Op.Dockets 11319, 11913 and 12080, and of the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals in Ratterman v.

Doe v. BMG Sports LLC

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Feb 4, 2022

It is headed by the Mariemont Board of Education (“Board of Education” or “Board”). There are two elementary schools in the District, one junior high school, and one high school. … Jones v. Nationstar Mortg. LLC, No. 14-11642, 2014 WL 5307168, at *7 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 16, 2014) (citing Brown v. VHS of Mich., Inc., 545 F. App’x 368, 372 (6th Cir. 2013)).

Drane v. Streck

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jul 29, 2024

But it does not appear that either Brown or Olakwesu is an attorney licensed to practice law in this Court. Nor does it appear that petitioner is unable to prosecute this case on her own behalf. See Tate v. … (quoting Whitmore v. Arkansas, 495 U.S. 149, 163-4 (1990)).

Whitt MacHine, Inc. v. Essex Insurance

631 F. Supp. 2d 927 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Apr 14, 2009

Anderson, 477 U.S. at 247-248 , 106 S.Ct. 2505 (emphasis added); see generally Booker v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Co., Inc., 879 F.2d 1304, 1310 (6th Cir.1989). … .); Baker v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., 107 Ohio App.3d 835 , 669 N.E.2d 553 (Ohio App. 10th Dist.1995); Brown v. Ohio Cas. Ins. Co., 63 Ohio App.2d 87, 91 , 409 N.E.2d 253, 256 (Ohio App. 8th Dist.1978)).

Johnson v. Life Insurance Company of North America

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Sep 13, 2023

Through his employment at Brown & Brown, Inc., Plaintiff became a participant in an ERISA-governed welfare benefit plan providing LTD benefits (“the Plan”), which 1 Farhner v. United Transp. … & Brown, Inc.

Gabbard v. Butler County, Ohio

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 20, 2025

Plaintiff notified her supervisor, Tammy Brown, of her pregnancy in October 2021. (Id. at Pg. ID 102; Brown Dep., Doc. 21-1, Pg. ID 843.) … Brown v. VHS of Mich., Inc., 545 Fed. App’x. 368, 372 (6th Cir. 2013). Accordingly, Defendants are entitled to summary judgment on Plaintiff's abandoned retaliation claim.

Fifth Third Bank, National Association v. Uknown Heirs

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Aug 18, 2023

See generally, Murphy Bros., Inc. v. … See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). 6

Western & Southern Life Ins. v. Dean

9 F. Supp. 36 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Feb 7, 1934

As set out in the stipulation of facts and shown by Exhibit G, attached thereto: “On or about February 6,1928, pursuant to a resolution of plaintiff’s Board of Directors duly adopted at a regular meeting of said Board held … A. 9); Hering v. Tait, 65 F.(2d) 703 (C. C. A. 4).

Zobel v. Contech Enterprises

170 F. Supp. 3d 1041 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 21, 2016

Defendant Cary Gregory (“Gregory”) is an individual residing in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, and at all relevant times, was a member of the Board of Directors and a shareholder of Contech. (Id. ¶ 8.) … Canada, who were, at all relevant times, members of the Board of Directors and/or shareholders of Contech. (Id. ¶¶ 9-10.)

In Re: Ohio Execution Protocol Litigation

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Nov 7, 2019

Co. v. Superior Court of California, Riverside Cnty., 464 U.S. 501, 509-11 (1984); Baxter, Int'l, Inc. v. Abbott Labs., 297 F.3d 544, 548 (7th Cir. 2002); and Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. … Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. F.T.C., 710 F.2d 1165, 1180 (6th Cir. 1983). That interest rests on several grounds.

Moxley v. Vernot

555 F. Supp. 554 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Nov 29, 1982

Healthy City Board of Education v. … In Vaughn v.

Drane v. Streck

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Sep 18, 2024

See Link v. … See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981).

Litchfield v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

136 F. Supp. 2d 756 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jul 10, 2000

Franchise Tax Board v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust, 463 U.S. 1 , 103 S.Ct. 2841 , 77 L.Ed.2d 420 (1983). Thus, the Court’s review of the propriety of removal is based upon the complaint. Pullman Co. v. … See Read-Rite Corp. v. Burlington Air Exp., Ltd., 186 F.3d 1190 (9th Cir.1999), citing Deiro v. American Airlines, Inc., 816 F.2d 1360, 1365 (9th Cir.1987); Sam L. Majors v.

Kornbluh v. Stearns & Foster Co.

73 F.R.D. 307 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Aug 20, 1976

Board of Education, 460 F.2d 1355 (7th Cir. 1972); contra, Schneider v. Margossian, 349 F.Supp. 741, 746 (D.Mass.1972). … The appeal of this finding was rejected by the OBES Board of Review.