Case law

Harris v. German Township, Ohio

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 23, 2022

See Browning v. Pendleton, 869 F.2d 989, 992 (6th Cir. 1989) (en banc) (citing Ohio Rev. Code 8 2305.10). … v.

Boards of Trustees of Ohio Laborers' Fringe Benefit Programs v. West End Land Development, Inc.

664 F. Supp. 2d 850 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Sep 24, 2009

See, e.g., Paluda v. … See also Farmer v.

Lammers Barrel PRP Group v. Carboline Company

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 27, 2020

of America v. … v.

Mitroff v. Xomox Corp.

631 F. Supp. 25 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 22, 1985

Northcross of Board of Education of the City of Memphis, 611 F.2d 624 (6th Cir.1979). … Brinkman v. Gilligan, 557 F.Supp. 610 (S.D.Ohio 1982), aff'd 697 F.2d 163 (6th Cir.1983).

Kelly v. United States Postal Service

492 F. Supp. 121 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Apr 21, 1980

Healthy Board of Ed. v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274, 285-87 , 97 S.Ct. 568, 575-76 , 50 L.Ed.2d 471 (1977). … Healthy City Board of Ed. v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274, 283-84 , 97 S.Ct. 568, 574 , 50 L.Ed.2d 471 (1977); Perry v.

Willis v. ODRC (Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Corrections)

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jun 8, 2022

Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989). … Brown, 2019 WL 5436159, at *4 (quoting Cromer v. Dominguez, 103 F. App’x 570, 573 (6th Cir. 2004)).

In Re: Ohio Execution Protocol Litigation

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Sep 27, 2019

Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. F.T.C., 710 F.2d 1165, 1180 (6th Cir. 1983). That interest rests on several grounds. … See Brown & Williamson, 710 F.2d at 1179.

Insituform of North America, Inc. v. Midwest Pipeliners, Inc.

139 F.R.D. 622 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Nov 29, 1991

Kitchen v. Aristech Chemical, 769 F.Supp. 254 (S.D. Ohio 1991) (Weber, J.). See also, W.T. Grant Co. v. Haines, 531 F.2d 671 (2d Cir.1976); Papanicolaou v. … Mentor Lagoons, Inc. v.

United States v. Fofana

620 F. Supp. 2d 857 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jun 2, 2009

United States v. Davis, 482 F.2d 893, 910 (9th Cir.1973), overruled on other grounds by United States v. Aukai 497 F.3d 955, 960-61 (9th Cir.2007) (en banc); see also Board of Educ. of Indep. Sch. Dist. … United States v.

Stafford v. Sugarcreek Township

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Aug 8, 2025

Brown v. Lewis, 779 F.3d 401, 411 (6th Cir. 2015) (quoting Silberstein v. City of Dayton, 440 F.3d 306, 311 (6th Cir. 2006)). … V.

Fleming Companies, Inc. v. Thriftway, Inc.

809 F. Supp. 38 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Oct 28, 1992

BACKGROUND This action follows a decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeals Board (“TTAB”) denying the Plaintiff concurrent registration covering a certain trading area, of the trademark “THRIFTWAY.” … Thus, in applying this standard, the court should give considerable deference to the decision of the board. See 1 Jerome Gilson, Trademark Protection and Practice § 3.05[4] (1990).

JEFFREY ALAN DAVIS v. TPU SGT. HANCOCK, et al.

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jun 24, 2026

See, e.g., Brown v. McCullick, No. 18-2226, 2019 WL 5436159, at *4 (6th Cir. Apr. 23, 2019) (cleaned up). … (citing Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989)).

Black v. Columbus Public Schools

211 F. Supp. 2d 975 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · May 8, 2002

Baldwin County Welcome Center v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147, 152 , 104 S.Ct. 1723 , 80 L.Ed.2d 196 (1984). The Supreme Court has also noted that “[federal courts have typically extended equitable relief only sparingly.” … See Baldwin County Welcome Center v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147, 152 , 104 S.Ct. 1723 , 80 L.Ed.2d 196 (1984).

Adams v. Anheuser-Busch Companies, Inc.

917 F. Supp. 2d 697 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jan 9, 2013

of the full Board at which the adoption of § 19.11 was approved. … In Rowe v.

Philip Carey Mfg. Co. v. Dean

43 F.2d 369 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jul 22, 1930

The board of directors never delegated you or Mr. Cra.bbs to go to Washington; that is correct, isn’t it? A. Yes, sir. “XQ41. Nor the stockholders. That is .your end of it; you handle the financial end of it, and Mr.. … The court is of the opinion further that under such circumstances as existed in the instant ease, the law would impute knowledge to the directors under the rule applied by the Supreme Court in the case of Martin v.

Vinson v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Dec 5, 2024

(R&R, PageID 392 (quoting Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825, 842 (1994)).) Mr. … (R&R, PageID 397); see Wesley v.

Spitzley v. Together Health

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 2, 2023

Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 697 (2009) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). … See Weiner v. Klais & Co., 108 F.3d 86, 89 (6th Cir. 1997) (quoting Venture Assoc. v.

Wimberg v. Ohio Deposit Guarantee Fund

716 F. Supp. 1043 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jul 21, 1989

In Chiarella v. … See also Radol v. Thomas, 772 F.2d 244, 253 (6th Cir.1985). In Basic, Inc. v.

In Re National Century Financial Enterprises, Inc. Financial Investment Litigation

553 F. Supp. 2d 902 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Apr 2, 2008

See Dresner v. … Plaintiffs do not allege that the Beacon Entities or *914 JPMorgan directly owned stock in e-Med-Soft or could appoint members to e-Med-Soft’s board.

Little v. Purdue Pharma, L.P.

227 F. Supp. 2d 838 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Sep 20, 2002

Franchise Tax Board, 463 U.S. at 13 , 103 S.Ct. 2841 . Smith itself was not a removal case. … See Franchise Tax Board, 463 U.S. at 25-26 , 103 S.Ct. 2841 .