Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersohsd

5,831 results

1.12s

  • Greene v. Brigano

    904 F. Supp. 675 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Oct 10, 1995

    Brown, 372 U.S. 477 , 83 S.Ct. 768 , 9 L.Ed.2d 892 (1963) (extending the indigent defendant’s right to transcripts to state post-conviction proceedings). … Anders v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Schmidt v. Overland Xpress, LLC

    District Court, S.D. Ohio · May 28, 2021

    Humana controlled the decision to deny Schmidt’s claims for medical benefits under the Plan, so the Browns cannot be liable under § 1132(a)(1)(B). See Daniel v. … See, e.g., Peters v. Lincoln Elec.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Wright v. City of Cincinnati

    450 F. Supp. 2d 831 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · May 10, 2006

    Like Weaver, the first step in the process herein, the meeting with the Executive Board, uses union officials, members of the Board, to resolve the matter. … See Reese v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Pough v. DeWine

    District Court, S.D. Ohio · Sep 25, 2024

    July 28, 2022) (the Ohio Parole Board’s “knowing reliance on false information in a parolee’s file, which is prohibited under state law, can constitute a due process violation.” (citing State ex rel. Keith v. … In Brown v. Cool, No. 2:21-cv-5146, 2023 WL 10511455, at *2 (S.D.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Whitt v. Casto

    District Court, S.D. Ohio · May 18, 2021

    App’x 975, 976-77 (6th Cir. 2012) (quoting Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989)). II. … Brown v. Partin, No. 1:20-CV-235, 2020 WL 5077037, at *3 (E.D. Tenn. Aug. 27, 2020). For these reasons, Plaintiff’s Complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Practice Perfect, Inc. v. Hamilton County Pharmaceutical Assoc.

    732 F. Supp. 798 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Oct 3, 1989

    The letter stated that the HCPA had forwarded Practice Perfect’s solicitation letter to both the Ohio State Medical Board and the State Board of Pharmacy, and that “[b]oth of these regulatory bodies share our concern and … Brunswick Corp. v. Spinit Reel Co., 832 F.2d 513, 525 (10th Cir.1987); Schutt Manufacturing Co. v. Riddell, Inc., 673 F.2d 202, 206-07 (7th Cir.1982); Quabaug Rubber Co. v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Brewer v. Seiter

    838 F. Supp. 340 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 31, 1993

    Based upon information provided by confidential informants, a Rules Infraction Board (“RIB” or “Board”) was convened. The RIB found the Plaintiff guilty of aggravated assault. … Hensley v. Wilson, 850 F.2d 269, 277 (6th Cir.1988).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Matter of Baldwin-United Corp.

    43 B.R. 443 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Aug 31, 1984

    As noted in Wisener v. … V.

    Cited 50 timesPublished
  • Sahm v. Miami University

    110 F. Supp. 3d 774 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · May 20, 2015

    Tobergte later offered opinion testimony to the Disciplinary Board which conducted Sahm’s disciplinary hearing. Tobergte did not disclose her role as a *776 member of the Task Force to the Disciplinary Board. … See Wells v. Xavier Univ., 7 F.Supp.3d 746 (S.D.Ohio 2014).

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • Township of Jefferson v. City of West Carrollton

    517 F. Supp. 417 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jun 23, 1981

    In The Detroit Edison Company v. … See also Detroit Edison Co. v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Dudley v. Stonecroft Ministries, Inc.

    142 F. Supp. 3d 653 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Nov 3, 2015

    Even with the raise, she received lower pay than the other vice presidents on the executive board. (Doc. 28-4, Thompson Dep. at 158). … Granderson v. Univ. of Mich., 211 Fed.Appx. 398, 400 (6th Cir.2006). “The burden of -demonstrating exhaustion lies with the plaintiff.” Smith v. Healthsouth Rehab.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Meekison v. Voinovich

    17 F. Supp. 2d 725 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Aug 21, 1998

    Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 248 , 106 S.Ct. 2505 , 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986); see also Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co. v. … Lyng v. Payne, 476 U.S. 926, 939 , 106 S.Ct. 2333 , 90 L.Ed.2d 921 (1986); Wolpaw v. Commissioner of the Internal Revenue, 47 F.3d 787, 790 (6th Cir.1995).

    Reversed in part, on other grounds by Meekison v. Voinovich, 67 F. App'x 900 (2008)Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Subler Transfer, Inc. v. United States

    396 F. Supp. 762 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jan 21, 1975

    Consolidated Edison Co. v. Labor Board, 305 U.S. 197, 229 , 59 S.Ct. 206, 217 , 83 L.Ed. 126 . … Labor Board v. Columbian Enameling & Stamping Co., 306 U.S. 292, 300 , 59 S.Ct. 501, 505 , 83 L.Ed. 660 .

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • American Casualty Co. of Reading, Pennsylvania v. FSLIC

    683 F. Supp. 1183 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Apr 13, 1988

    On July 25, 1986, the Federal Home Loan Bank Board declared Major Federal insolvent and appointed FSLIC as the receiver. … Miller v. Marrocco, 28 Ohio St.3d 438 , 504 N.E.2d 67 (1986).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Total Benefits Planning Agency Inc. v. Anthem Blue Cross & Blue Shield

    630 F. Supp. 2d 842 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jul 25, 2007

    Co *848 lumbia Natural Res., Inc. v. Tatum, 58 F.3d 1101 , 1109 (6th Cir.1995). C. Sherman Act Section 1 of the Sherman Act was enacted to prohibit unreasonable restraints of trade. Board of Trade of City of Chicago v. … Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, 320 , 82 S.Ct. 1502 , 8 L.Ed.2d 510 (1962).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Schmidt v. Overland Xpress, LLC

    District Court, S.D. Ohio · Sep 28, 2020

    Barrett v. … See, e.g., Peters v. Lincoln Elec.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • United States v. Brustein

    296 F. Supp. 134 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Feb 12, 1969

    Finally, as a point of distinction from United States v. … Michener v. United States, 184 F.2d 712 (10th Cir. 1950).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Co. v. Mallinckrodt, Inc.

    654 F. Supp. 890 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jan 30, 1987

    James Brown, Director of Research for Radio-pharmaceuticals for Mallinckrodt, was in attendance at the meeting. When the meeting concluded, Brown informed his su *897 periors of the substance of the meeting. … Mallinckrodt never filed a response to the show cause order and on December 7, 1977 the Board of Patent Interferences awarded priority to NEN.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Leaman v. Ohio Department of Mental Retardation & Developmental Disabilities

    620 F. Supp. 783 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · May 14, 1985

    No. 1, Exhibit B) Plaintiff appealed her dismissal to the Ohio Personnel Board of Review. … See, e.g., Lee v. Western Reserve Psychiatric Habilitation Center, 747 F.2d 1062 (6th Cir.1984); Hall v. Medical College, 742 F.2d 299 (6th Cir.1984).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Harris v. Commissioner of Social Security

    District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 31, 2022

    Rabbers v. Comm’r Soc. Sec., 582 F.3d 647, 651 (6th Cir. 2007) (quoting Rogers v. Comm’r Soc. Sec., 486 F 3d 234, 241 (6th Cir. 2007)). … Bowen v. Comm’r Soc. Sec., 478 F. 3d 742, 746 (6th Cir. 2007). III.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.