Case law

Ohio Public Employees Retirement System v. Fannie Mae

357 F. Supp. 2d 1027 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Feb 23, 2005

On September 22, 2004, before the market opened, the Presiding Director of Fannie Mae’s Board of Directors (the “Fannie Mae Board” or the “Board”), Ann Korologos, issued a public statement disclosing that the OFHEO had discovered … In its letter to the *1031 Fannie Mae Board, OFHEO informed the Board that its “findings cannot be explained as mere differences in interpretation of accounting principles, but clear instances in which management sought to

In Re Telectronics Pacing Systems, Inc.

953 F. Supp. 909 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Feb 3, 1997

PDL argues that all of the companies have separate boards and books. … See Meredith v.

University of Cincinnati v. Shalala

891 F. Supp. 1262 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jun 9, 1995

Edgewater Hosp., Inc. v. Bowen, 857 F.2d 1123, 1131 (7th Cir.1988) (citing and quoting Bethesda Hospital Ass’n v. … HCA Health Services of Oklahoma, Inc. v.

Warner v. Federal Deposit Insurance

672 F. Supp. 1028 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Oct 5, 1987

In Re Brown, 412 F.Supp. 1066, 1071 (W.D.Okl.1975). … Stuart Inc. v. Bennett, 617 P.2d 879 (1980).

In re Farmers' Supply Co.

170 F. 502 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · May 6, 1909

At a meeting of the board of directors of the Supply Company held in May, 1907, it was unanimously agreed that if Stine and Lenz would indorse two notes of the company for $1,000 and $1,500, respectively, to enable it to … The conditioning clause does not correctly describe the consideration of the mortgage, nor does it or the resolution of the board give any information as to the date of the note, nor, except by implication, to whom the note

Sommer v. City of Dayton, Ohio

556 F. Supp. 427 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jan 14, 1983

Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c); Board of Education v. Pico, - U.S. -, 102 S.Ct. 2799, 2806 , 73 L.Ed.2d 435 (1982); Atlas Concrete Pipe, Inc. v. Au & Son, Inc., 668 F.2d 905, 908 (6th Cir.1982). … Accord, Newsom v. Vanderbilt University, 653 F.2d 1100, 1116-17 (6th Cir. 1981); Lacy v. Dayton Board of Education, 550 F.Supp. 835 at 840 (S.D.Ohio 1982).

Smith v. Dean

52 F.2d 291 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jun 4, 1931

Red Wing Malting Co. v. Willcuts (C. C. A.) 15 F.(2d) 626 , 49 A. L. R. 459, 634, certiorari denied 273 U. S. 763 , 47 S. Ct. 476 , 71 L. Ed. 879 ; Arizona Commercial Mining Co. v. Casey (D. … C.) 32 F.(2d) 288 ; Paul Jones & Co. v. Lucas (D. C.) 33 F.(2d) 907, 908 .

Gaskins v. Thousand Trails, LP

521 F. Supp. 2d 693 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Oct 11, 2007

Browning v. Levy, 283 F.3d 761, 775 (6th Cir.2002). A finding of statements of omission in a bankruptcy schedule of assets is sufficient for the trial court to apply judicial estoppel. Eubanks v. CBSK Fin. … See, e.g., United States v. Hussein, 178 F.3d 125, 180 (2nd Cir.1999); King v. Herbert J. Thomas Mem’l Hosp., 159 F.3d 192 , 196-97 (4th Cir.1998); Helfand v. Gerson, 105 F.3d 530, 536 (9th Cir.1997).

Adams Express Co. v. Poe

61 F. 470 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Apr 23, 1894

claimed, and could not be, that the failure to return the safes is an explanation of the difference between $53,000, the amount returned by the company as the value of its property in Ohio, and the $460,000 at which the board … It is very true, as said by the supreme court in the case of Express Co. v. Seibert, 142 U. S. 339 , 12 Sup.

Baker v. Chevron USA, Inc.

680 F. Supp. 2d 865 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jan 6, 2010

Ma't'y Etta Brown Greener Mary Etta Brown Greener was born in 1952. She lived in Cleves from 1952 to 1953 and in Hooven from 1953 to 1971 and from 1975 to 1976. … Allen v.

City Ry. Co. v. Beard

293 F. 448 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Oct 2, 1923

Co. v. Board of Commissioners, 54 Kan. 781, 792 , 39 Pac. 1039 , quoted with approval in Mudge v. McDougal (D. … If any board which is an essential part of the taxing system intentionally, and therefore fraudulently, violates the law, by uniformly undervaluing certain, classes of property, the assessment by otter boards of other classes

Martin v. Taft

222 F. Supp. 2d 940 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Sep 19, 2002

V. … Cerreto, Olmstead: The Brown v. Board of Education for Disability Rights Promises, Limits, and Issues, 3 Loy. J. Pub. Int. L. 47 (2001)("Cerreto”).

The Gretna Green

20 F. 901 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jul 1, 1883

*In the case of Gibbons v. … In Sinnott v.

Chappel v. Hunter

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jul 8, 2024

The Court reasoned that even if she had named the Board as a defendant, her “claim would fail because she did not allege that a specific policy, custom, or decision of the Adams County Board of Commissioners caused her … Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989); see also Brown v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 507 Fed.

The Liberty No. 4

7 F. 226 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · May 15, 1881

, in short, are as follows; (1) That the Security Insurance Company and the Providence Washington Insurance Company were, in December, 1879, and now are, engaged in the business of insuring all kinds of goods laden upon board … Propeller Monticello v. Mollison, 17 How. (S. C.) 153; Ins. Co. v. C. D. *231 1 Wood, 72. The wrong-doer is bound to make satisfaction.

The Scotts Co. v. Central Garden & Pet Co.

256 F. Supp. 2d 734 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 20, 2003

Brown that he believed Central’s sales were “about $15 million.” (April 22, 2002 transcript at 148). … Central relies on Brown’s testimony in support of its claim, arguing that the testimony fills in the missing sales figures gap.

Long v. UAW Local No. 674

545 F. Supp. 2d 702 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 25, 2008

In Finnegan v. … See Tisdale v.

Hunter v. Dove

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jan 12, 2024

Courts in this circuit have consistently found that members of professional licensing or disciplinary boards and disciplinary counsel are entitled to quasi-judicial immunity. See, e.g., McQueen v. … Brown, No. 2:11-cv-82, 2011 WL 855128, at *1 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 9, 2011) (Graham, J.)

Harter v. Franklin County Department of Sanitary Engineers

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Aug 19, 2025

Co. v. … Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. United States, 201 F.2d 819, 822 (6th Cir. 1953). Ms. Harter moves to strike portions of Mr.

Radol v. Thomas

556 F. Supp. 586 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Feb 2, 1983

Plaintiffs rely on Mobil Corp. v. … In TSC Industries, Inc. v.