Case law

Reed v. Rhodes

869 F. Supp. 1274 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · May 25, 1994

See Green v. County School Board of New Kent County, 391 U.S. 430, 438 , 88 S.Ct. 1689, 1694 , 20 L.Ed.2d 716 (1968). … Stotts, 467 U.S. 561 , 104 S.Ct. 2576 , 81 L.Ed.2d 483 (1984); Bronson v. Board of Education of the City School District of the City of Cincinnati, 604 F.Supp. 68 (S.D.Ohio 1984). A.

Reed v. Rhodes

934 F. Supp. 1485 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Feb 1, 1996

Dempsey of Cleveland, and Maree Sneed and her Washington, D.C. law firm of Hogan & Hartson, would no longer be special counsel of record representing the Cleveland School Board in Reed v. … Olle, Jr. v. Henry & Wright Corporation, 910 F.2d 357, 365 (6th Cir.1990); Hopper, 867 F.2d at 293 .

Poulos v. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Nov 22, 2022

Beamon v. Brown, 125 F.3d 965, 967 (6th Cir. 1997) (citations omitted). … First, in Beamon v.

Heidman v. United States

414 F. Supp. 47 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · May 20, 1976

While the Court is aware that the Boards for Correction of Military Records have been criticized by some as inadequate, see, *49 New v. … See, Seepe v. Dept. of Navy, 518 F.2d 760 (6th Cir. 1975); Horn v. Sehlesinger, 514 F.2d 549 (8th Cir. 1975); Mindes v. Seaman, 453 F.2d 197 (5th Cir. 1971).

Gomez v. Huntington Trust Co., NA

129 F. Supp. 2d 1116 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Nov 16, 2000

The Federal Reserve Board conducted an examination of Towne and, on June 30, 1997, issued a report. … Towne Did Not Modify Expiration Date by Board Minutes Huntington argues that the minutes of meetings of Towne’s Board of Directors evidence a mutual agreement between Huntington and Towne to extend the Escrow Agreement to

JAMES J. McHALE COMPANY v. United States

151 F. Supp. 115 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 13, 1957

This new arrangement was made so that Berger would not abandon the enterprise and his friend and it was set forth in á resolution adopted by the Board of Directors in January, 1948 and reaffirmed by the Board in January, … The court is constrained to follow the dictate of this 6th Circuit in the case of Mayson Manufacturing Co. v.

Jones v. Wittenberg

440 F. Supp. 60 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jul 29, 1977

Jones v. Metzger, 456 F.2d 854 (6th Cir. 1972). Reliance upon the Court’s opinion in Jones v. … Oatmeal Sandwich 1 C Hash Browns 9:00 PM 1 Whole Pear 1 Bl. Vegt. Beef Soup % C. Butter Wax Beans 1 Pc.

Stubli v. Principi

362 F. Supp. 2d 949 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 10, 2005

United States v. Testan, 424 U.S. 392, 399 , 96 S.Ct. 948 , 47 L.Ed.2d 114 (1976); Beamon v. Brown, 125 F.3d 965, 967 (6th Cir.1997). … See Loftin v. Rush, 767 F.2d 800, 809 (11th Cir.1985).

G.M. v. Lakeview Local School District

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Sep 16, 2020

See Leary v. Daeschner, 349 F.3d 888, 909 (6th Cir. 2003); S&W Enters., L.L.C. v. Southtrust Bank of Ala., N.A., 315 F.3d 533, 536 (Sth Cir. 2003); W. Va. Housing Dev. Fund v. Ocwen Tech. … Leary, 349 F.3d at 909; Phelps v.

Todaro v. Pederson

205 F. Supp. 612 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Apr 7, 1961

Midwest Farmers, Inc. v. United States, D.C., 64 F. Supp. 91, 96 ; National Broadcasting Co. v. United States, D.C., 47 F.Supp. 940 , aff’d. 319 U.S. 190 , 63 S.Ct. 997 , 87 L.Ed. 1344 ; Fields v. Hannegan, 82 U.S.App. … D.C. 234, 162 F.2d 17 ; Irvin v. Hobby, D.C., 131 F.Supp. 851 .

Smith v. Padilla

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Oct 28, 2022

Mazza, Tonya Bowser, Paul Sackett, and Vencot Brown (Doc. No. 1). … This standard is satisfied when “there is any evidence in the record that could support the conclusion reached by the disciplinary board.” Id.

Reichman

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Oct 16, 2025

See Hefley v. … Moore v. Cooper, 127 F.R.D. 422, 422 (D.D.C. 1989). Therefore, they cannot use Rule 20 to add Mr. Brown.

Krause v. Rhodes

390 F. Supp. 1070 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Nov 14, 1974

Hoffman v. United States, 341 U.S. 479, 486 , 71 S.Ct. 814 , 95 L.Ed. 1118 (1951); Rogers v. United States, 340 U.S. 367, 374 , 71 S.Ct. 438 , 95 L.Ed. 344 (1951); United States v. … Rogers v. United States, supra 340 U.S. at 371 , 71 S.Ct. 438 ; Brown v. Walker, 161 U.S. 591, 609 , 16 S.Ct. 644 , 40 L.Ed. 819 (1896).

Nottke v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.

264 F. Supp. 3d 859 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Sep 6, 2017

v. … Brown, supra, 87 Ohio App.3d at 713 , 622 N.E.2d 1153 . But that is merely one. way, rather than the only way, of pleading an absolute-nuisance claim.

Collins v. Perini

448 F. Supp. 1006 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 2, 1978

Picard v. Connor, supra, 404 U.S. at 276, 92 S.Ct. at 512 . See also Balthazar v. … Among the unreported cases from the Ohio courts of appeals submitted by the petitioner is State v. Brown, No. 74AP-1 (10th Appellate District, Franklin Cty. 1974).

Commonwealth S. S. Co. v. American Shipbuilding Co.

197 F. 780 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jan 20, 1912

“When, on August 3, 1906, Browne and Stuart made their proposition to sell the mill to their company, and they and their co-operating associates, acting as the board of directors, accepted it for the company, the company … All should be fair, above board.

Adacia v. Focus Cleveland

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Aug 19, 2025

Herman House, and several individuals identified as “Board of Directors.” (Doc. No. 1). Plaintiff also filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. … Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989).

East Ohio Gas Co. v. City of Cleveland

23 F. Supp. 965 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jun 22, 1937

Co. v. … In Dohany v.

The Oriental

18 F. Cas. 804 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Dec 15, 1876

This rule was adopted in the case of Northrup v. … These decisions, in a recent case • decided by Judge Brown, — Thompson v. Carson [Id. 13,948], — of the same district, were cited and approved by him.

United States v. Miller

448 F. Supp. 2d 860 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Aug 25, 2006

McNally accepted prior to boarding the M/V Stardancer contained a contractual, one-year time limitation for filing certain types of actions, including Petitioner’s sur-vivorship claim, and that the provision applies here. … The Government claims the McNallys were given tickets when they boarded the M/V Stardancer that contained such a one-year limitation clause, that the clause is enforceable here, and that the McNallys filed their claim after