Case law

Mitchell Inv. Co. v. Republic Steel Corp.

63 F. Supp. 323 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jul 3, 1944

The principle upon which the Kean v. Johnson Case [Kean v. … The present case is like the case of Sewell v. East Cape May, etc.

Belasco v. Warrensville Heights City School District

86 F. Supp. 3d 748 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jan 16, 2015

“An employer may make employment decisions “ ‘for a good reason, a bad reason, a reason based on erroneous facts, or for no reason at all, as long as its action is not for a discriminatory reason.’ ” ” Brown v. … An employer may make employment decisions “ ‘for a good reason, a bad reason, a reason based on erroneous facts, or for no reason at all, as long as its action is not for a discriminatory reason.’ ” Brown v.

Atsas v. Bowen

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jun 25, 2025

Brown v. Chapman, 814 F.3d 447, 462 (6th Cir. 2016) (citing Monell v. Dep’t of Soc. Servs., 436 US. 658, 694 (2016)). … Roell v. Hamilton Cty., 870 F.3d 471, 487 (6th Cir. 2017) (quoting Brown, 814 F.3d at 463).

Smith v. Prokop

496 F. Supp. 861 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Sep 9, 1980

of the Board, has moved this Court to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which a relief could be granted. … Glenn v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 616 F.2d 270, 271 (C.A. 6, 1980); see Kyle v. I. C. C, 609 F.2d 540, 542 (C.A., D.C., 1980).

Lamson v. Firestone Tire and Rubber Co.

724 F. Supp. 511 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Nov 13, 1989

v. … Harms Co. v. Eliscu, 339 F.2d 823, 827 (2d Cir.1964)).

Vann v. Toledo Metropolitan Housing Authority

113 F. Supp. 210 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jun 23, 1953

(Shelley v. Kraemer, 334 U.S. 1 , 68 S.Ct. 836 , 92 L.Ed. 1161 .) “(See also, Buchanan v. Warley (1917) 245 U.S. 60 , 38 S.Ct. 16 , 62 L.Ed. 149 ; Harmon v. … Tyler (1926) 273 U.S. 668 , 47 S.Ct. 471 , 71 L.Ed. 831 ; City of Birmingham v. Monk, 5 Cir., 185 F.2d 859 .)

Denman v. Youngstown State University

545 F. Supp. 2d 671 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Feb 20, 2008

. # 99 at 2). 1 Denman claims that the YSU Board of Trustees (“Board”) first looked into the validity of her COE in February 2004. David Sweet became President of YSU in July 2000. … Corning Glass Works v.

Kowalski v. Kowalski Heat Treating, Co.

920 F. Supp. 799 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 27, 1996

An employer is an interested party to decisions before the Unemployment Compensation Board and is entitled to notice and opportunity to be heard before a board of review in respect to all claims filed for unemployment compensation … Village of Moscow v. Ohio Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 23 Ohio Misc.2d 15, 16 , 491 N.E.2d 744, 746 (1985). An employer may file an appeal from a decision of the unemployment compensation board of review.

Turner v. City of Toledo

671 F. Supp. 2d 967 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Dec 2, 2009

Lucas County Board of Commissioners, 69 Ohio App.3d 789, 769 [796] [ 591 N.E.2d 1287 ] (1990). … Bd. of Comm’rs., 69 Ohio App.3d 789, 796 , 591 N.E.2d 1287 (Ohio.App. 6 Dist.1990) (“The board of county commissioners, as a quasi-corporate body, represents the county in legal actions against the county”); Stone v.

Buckeye Community Hope Foundation v. City of Cuyahoga Falls

209 F. Supp. 2d 719 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jul 5, 1996

Silver v. Franklin Township Board of Zoning Appeals, 966 F.2d 1031, 1036 (6th Cir.1992). … Arthur v.

Mercer v. Lothamer

321 F. Supp. 335 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jan 7, 1971

See, also, Jackson et al. v. … Being persuaded that Jackson v.

Reed v. Rhodes

1 F. Supp. 2d 705 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 27, 1998

But in deciding whether to modify or dissolve a desegregation decree, a school board’s compliance with previous court orders is obviously relevant.” Board of Ed. of Oklahoma v. … Board of Ed. of Oklahoma City v. Dowell, 498 U.S. 237, 246 , 111 S.Ct 630, 636 , 112 L.Ed.2d 715 (1991).

City of Cleveland v. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co.

538 F. Supp. 1306 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Oct 31, 1980

Similarly, in Brown Shoe Company v. … In Brown Shoe Company v.

Oracle Wetmore Co. v. Citibank, N. A.

534 F. Supp. 1159 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Feb 26, 1982

Connecticut Bankers Association v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 627 F.2d at 247 ; cf. Independent Bankers Association v. … Independent Bankers Association v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 516 F.2d at 1210 .

American Ship Building Co. v. Local Union 358, Brotherhood of Boilermakers

459 F. Supp. 491 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jul 21, 1978

(the Board) have recognized prior and subsequent to the decision of the Supreme Court in Boys Markets, supra. … As the court stated in Elevator Mfr’s Assn. of N.Y. v. Int’l U. of El.

Burks v. Perk

339 F. Supp. 1194 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Feb 17, 1972

Louisiana Power & Light Co. v. Thibodaux, 360 U.S. 25, 29 [ 79 S.Ct. 1070 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1058 ] (1959)England v. Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners, supra, 375 U.S. at 415 , 84 S.Ct. at 465 . … England v. Louisiana Board of Medical Examiners, supra, at 415-416, 84 S.Ct. 461 , 11 L.Ed.2d 440 ; Harrison v. NAACP, 360 U.S. 167, 177 , 79 S.Ct. 1025 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1152 (1959). As the Supreme Court stated in NAACP v.

F. Buddie Contracting, Ltd. v. Cuyahoga Community College District

31 F. Supp. 2d 571 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Oct 21, 1998

In Celotex Corp. v. … Tee-Pak Inc. v. St.

Buck v. Ford Motor Co.

810 F. Supp. 2d 815 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Aug 30, 2011

Brown’s Engineering and Test Division located in Bohemia, New York. Dayton T. Brown is a fully certified and accredited EMC test facility. … Abel is a founder of the ATSA and sits on its publications board.” . Differential diagnosis is a methodology used to determine causation, and normally associated with medical opinion testimony. See generally Best v.

Smith v. City of East Cleveland

363 F. Supp. 1131 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Sep 6, 1973

Chance v. Board of Examiners, 458 F.2d 1167 (2d Cir. 1972) ; Castro v. Beecher, 459 F.2d 725 (1st Cir. 1972); Carter v. … Knight v. Auciello, 453 F.2d 852 (1st Cir. 1972), cited in Northcross v. Board of Education, 412 U.S. 427 , 93 S.Ct. 2201 , 37 L.Ed.2d 48 , 51 n.2 (1973).

Beaver Pipe Tools, Inc. v. Carey

139 F. Supp. 470 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Dec 29, 1955

R. v. H. P. Hood & Sons, 1 Cir., 141 F.2d 467 ; Preston v. C. I. R., 2 Cir., 132 F.2d 763 , Brown-Rogers-Dixson Co. v. C. I. R., 4 Cir., 122 F.2d 347 . … Jordan Co. v. Allen, D.C., 85 F.Supp. 437 .