Case law

Bremiller v. Cleveland Psychiatric Institute

898 F. Supp. 572 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Aug 25, 1995

In Brown v. … To satisfy the commonality requirement, it is enough that “discrimination had been practiced across the board.” Senter v. General Motors Corp., 532 F.2d 511, 524 (6th Cir.1976).

Nemitz v. Norfolk and Western Railway Co.

287 F. Supp. 221 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jul 25, 1968

Therefore, the argument runs, the National Railroad Adjustment Board has exclusive jurisdiction, since the cause of action is based upon an ordinary collective bargaining agreement. Defendant cites the case of Arnold v. … Marsh v. County School Board of Roanoke County, Va., 305 F.2d 94, 98 (4th Cir. 1962).

Thomas v. New York, C. & ST. L. R.

97 F. Supp. 687 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jan 26, 1950

Patterson v. Chicago & E. I. R. Co., D.C., 50 F.Supp. 334 ; Washington Terminal Co. v. Boswell, 75 U.S.App.D.C. 1 , 124 F.2d 235 at page 240. … Co. v. Brotherhood of Railway Clerks, 281 U.S. 548 , 50 S.Ct. 427 , 74 LEd. 1034.

NAETHING v. Covington

168 F. Supp. 2d 779 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Oct 24, 2001

Browning v. Pendleton, 869 F.2d 989, 992 (6th Cir.1989). Finally, and in any event, the defendant insurance company is not a state actor. Thus, it cannot be sued under § 1983. … See, e.g., Gutierrez v.

Kromer v. Koepge

118 F. Supp. 571 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Dec 19, 1952

Koepge, as listed in paragraph 5 of the petition, and Carl V. Kromer, who was the manager of the hotel, and Wilbert G. Schwer, who was the personal attorney of Walter H. … of the defendant’s fraud or misrepresentation, or because of the defendant’s failure to perform or other improper act, or of the plaintiff’s own act discharging his obligation. * * * ” (Cited thereunder, we find: Lynch v.

Greater Fremont, Inc. v. City of Fremont

302 F. Supp. 652 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Dec 30, 1968

Village of Beachwood v. Board of Elections, 167 Ohio St. 369 , 148 N.E.2d 921 (1958); State ex rel. Cherrington v. Hutsinpiller, 112 Ohio St. 468 , 147 N.E. 647 (1925). … Brown v. Board of Education, 349 U.S. 294 , 75 S.Ct. 753 , 99 L.Ed. 1083 (1954). 20 Thus, the ordinances must be invalid in application to the plaintiffs if this is their basis.

Turner

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Apr 13, 2026

Answers in Genesis of Kentucky, Inc. v. … See Meyers v. Franklin Cnty. Ct. of C.P., 23 F.

Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. International Longshoremen's Ass'n, Local 1913

190 F. Supp. 2d 1021 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jan 31, 2002

Kaufman v. … The Board has exclusive jurisdiction over minor disputes, and a party cannot bypass the Board and take the dispute into federal court, except to enforce the Board’s award....

Roberts v. Mahoning County

495 F. Supp. 2d 719 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · May 17, 2007

of Mental Health — 648 Board. … TRAFICANTI, PRESIDENT OF THE BOARD ATTEST: /s/ Nancy M. Laboy NANCY M. LABOY, CLERK OF THE BOARD JR.

Northeastern Educational Television of Ohio, Inc. v. Educational Television Assoc. of Metropolitan Cleveland

758 F. Supp. 1560 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Nov 26, 1990

The omitted footnote to the Court’s foregoing language is a statement from Justice Brandéis in Board of Trade of the City of Chicago v. … Referring to the often cited language from Brown Shoe Co. v.

Holden v. Heckler

615 F. Supp. 686 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Aug 27, 1985

Although the Board is charged with the responsibility of formulating national labor policy, the courts bear the final responsibility for interpreting the labor laws ... [s]ee Marbury v. … Absent reversal, the decision is the law which the Board must follows.” 716 F.2d at 357 n. 12 (citations omitted). See also Beverly Enterprises v.

Alford v. United States

369 F. Supp. 1339 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Aug 14, 1973

Wissner v. Wissner, 338 U.S. 655, 660, 661 , 70 S.Ct. 398 , 94 L.Ed. 424 (1950); United States v. Donall, 466 F.2d 1246, 1247 (6th Cir. 1972); Dyke v. … Furthermore, the decision of the Board of Appeals did not constitute a novation of the waiver by the Veterans Administration.

Rachel v. Consolidated Rail Corp.

891 F. Supp. 428 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Apr 4, 1995

In Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. … Madore v.

Mitchell Inv. Co. v. Republic Steel Corp.

63 F. Supp. 323 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jul 3, 1944

The principle upon which the Kean v. Johnson Case [Kean v. … The present case is like the case of Sewell v. East Cape May, etc.

Belasco v. Warrensville Heights City School District

86 F. Supp. 3d 748 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jan 16, 2015

“An employer may make employment decisions “ ‘for a good reason, a bad reason, a reason based on erroneous facts, or for no reason at all, as long as its action is not for a discriminatory reason.’ ” ” Brown v. … An employer may make employment decisions “ ‘for a good reason, a bad reason, a reason based on erroneous facts, or for no reason at all, as long as its action is not for a discriminatory reason.’ ” Brown v.

Atsas v. Bowen

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jun 25, 2025

Brown v. Chapman, 814 F.3d 447, 462 (6th Cir. 2016) (citing Monell v. Dep’t of Soc. Servs., 436 US. 658, 694 (2016)). … Roell v. Hamilton Cty., 870 F.3d 471, 487 (6th Cir. 2017) (quoting Brown, 814 F.3d at 463).

Lamson v. Firestone Tire and Rubber Co.

724 F. Supp. 511 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Nov 13, 1989

v. … Harms Co. v. Eliscu, 339 F.2d 823, 827 (2d Cir.1964)).

Smith v. Prokop

496 F. Supp. 861 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Sep 9, 1980

of the Board, has moved this Court to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which a relief could be granted. … Glenn v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 616 F.2d 270, 271 (C.A. 6, 1980); see Kyle v. I. C. C, 609 F.2d 540, 542 (C.A., D.C., 1980).

United States v. Daubendiek

25 F.R.D. 50 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Oct 2, 1959

The Board of Veterans’ Appeals, on behalf of the Administrator of Veterans’ Affairs, affirmed the discontinuance of the defendant’s subsistence allowance and training. … Hemler v. Union Producing Co., D.C.1941, 40 F.Supp. 824, 837 . See Board of Public Instruction for County of Hernando, Fla. v. Meredith, 5 Cir., 1941, 119 F.2d 712 .

Boals v. Gray

577 F. Supp. 288 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Nov 9, 1983

Foulks v. … See Smith v.