Case law

Smith v. ABS Industries, Inc.

653 F. Supp. 94 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jun 30, 1986

service” be credited before determining eligibility under the Hospital Medical Plan if the shutdown of the plant is found to be an unfair labor practice in an administrative action initiated by the National Labor Relations Board … Defendants move to dismiss all ERISA claims for failure to exhaust available remedies, and to dismiss plaintiffs Brown and Haytcher for failure to state a claim.

Harper v. Union Savings Ass'n

429 F. Supp. 1254 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 14, 1977

Williams v. Matthews Co., 499 F.2d 819, 825 (8 Cir. 1974); United States v. Hunter, 459 F.2d 205 (4 Cir. 1972). … Similarly, Marr v.

Bill Call Ford, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.

830 F. Supp. 1045 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Aug 18, 1993

Harter Corp. v. Home Indemnity Co., 713 F.Supp. 231, 232 (W.D.Mich.1989); Bowman v. Preferred Risk Mut. Ins. … See, e.g., Lincoln Mutual Casualty Co. v.

United States v. McCafferty

801 F. Supp. 2d 605 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jul 14, 2011

In Brady v. … Specifically, with respect to the expert testimony of Lori Brown and Richard Koblentz, the defendant’s expert on the judicial code, the jury was instructed: You have heard the testimony of Lori Brown and Richard Koblentz,

Michael v. Ghee

325 F. Supp. 2d 829 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jul 12, 2004

In Landis v. … Harper v.

Jackshaw Pontiac, Inc. v. Cleveland Press Publishing Co.

102 F.R.D. 183 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · May 24, 1984

Rental Car of New Hampshire, Inc. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp., 496 F.Supp. 373, 380 (D.Mass.1980) (and cases cited therein); Brown v. … As the court in Sullivan v.

Playboy Enterprises, Inc. v. Russ Hardenburgh, Inc.

982 F. Supp. 503 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Nov 25, 1997

Gershwin Publishing Corp. v. Columbia Artists, 443 F.2d 1159, 1162 (2d Cir.1971). In Sony Corp. v. … Soc’y 46 I ( 1997); Joseph V. Myers, Note, Speaking Frankly About Copyright Infringement on Computer Bulletin Boards: Lessons to be Learned from Frank Music, Netcom, and the White Paper, 49 Vand.

King v. Perini

431 F. Supp. 481 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Nov 8, 1976

. § 2254 ; See, Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443, 448-49, fn. 3 , 73 S.Ct. 397 , 97 L.Ed. 469 (1953); Fay v. Nola, 372 U.S. 391, 398-99, 438 , 83 S.Ct. 822 , 9 L.Ed.2d 837 (1963); Picard v. … Dismissal of § 2254 petitions for failure to exhaust state remedies which are available as a matter of right are dismissals for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, see, Brown v.

Zehring v. Wick Agri-Buildings

590 F. Supp. 138 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jun 18, 1984

As Chief Justice Celebrezze noted in Temple v. … Friedman v. General Motors Corp., 43 Ohio St.2d 209 , 331 N.E.2d 702 (1975) (syllabus); State Auto Mutual Ins. Co. v. Chrysler Corp., 36 Ohio St.2d 151 , 304 N.E.2d 891 (1973); Nash v.

Cline v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

875 F. Supp. 435 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jan 22, 1995

As explained in Melkonyan v. … Hangartner v. Shalala, 865 F.Supp. 755, 759-60 (D.Utah 1994) (citing Keeton v. Dep’t of HHS, 21 F.3d 1064 (11th Cir. 1994); Nelson v. Sullivan, 966 F.2d 363, 366 (8th Cir.1992); Browning v.

McBean v. United States

147 F. Supp. 2d 820 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Apr 25, 2001

In U.S. v. … & Biege Python Cowboy Boots (Brand New/Justin)-$ 345.00 u. 1 Pair Black Men’s Loafers w/Tassles (Brand New/Steeple Gate) .$ 220.00 v. 1 Pair Black-Brown Men’s Loafers w/Tassles (Brand New/Steeple Gate) $ 220.00 w. 1 Pair

McLaughlin v. Internal Revenue Service

139 B.R. 9 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jun 28, 1991

In re Brown, 126 B.R. 767 (N.D.Ill.1991); accord, Rose v. Commercial National Bank, 112 B.R. 12 (E.D.Tex.1989). … In re Brown, 126 B.R. at 772 .

North American Company for Life and Health Insurance v. McGee Crowell

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jul 26, 2021

Brown Funeral Home Inc., an assignee of a portion of the life insurance proceeds. C. Brown Funeral Home Inc. was dismissed from the case with prejudice on December 8, 2020. (See Doc. … Co. v. Consol. Rail Corp., 767 F.2d 274, 279 (6th Cir. 1985) (quoting Golden v. Zwickler, 394 U.S. 103, 108 (1969)) (further citation omitted).

Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. v. Artra Group, Inc.

768 F. Supp. 248 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jul 31, 1991

Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. v. … In PBGC v.

Taylor v. National Group of Companies Inc.

872 F. Supp. 462 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Oct 7, 1994

Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc., — U.S. -, -, 114 S.Ct. 367, 370 , 126 L.Ed.2d 295 (1993). … The incident in which plaintiff alleges she was struck on the buttocks by a board wielded by the president of the company is an example of extremely severe sexual harassment. See, Campbell v.

Kolkowski

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Aug 26, 2026

Currently pending before the Court is Defendants’ Ashtabula Area City School District Board of Education (“District” or “Board”), Mark Astorino (“Astorino”), Dr. … Brown v. Louisville-Jefferson Cnty. Metro Gov’t, 135 F.4th 1022, 1034 (6th Cir. 2025) (citing Eidson v. Tenn. Dep’t of Child.’s Servs., 510 F.3d 631, 635 (6th Cir. 2007)).

Brunn v. City of Cleveland

526 F. Supp. 564 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Nov 19, 1981

Board of Curators v. Horowitz, 435 U.S. 78, 85-6 , 98 S.Ct. 948 , 55 L.Ed.2d 124 (1978). … Board of Curators v. Horowitz, at 435 U.S. 86 , 98 S.Ct. 948 ; Goss v. Lopez, 419 U.S. 565 ; 95 S.Ct. 729 , 42 L.Ed.2d 725 (1975).

Wirtz v. Local Union No. 1377

299 F. Supp. 641 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jun 6, 1969

In Wirtz v. … The law as stated in Wirtz v.

United States v. Hartford-Empire Co.

46 F. Supp. 541 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Aug 25, 1942

Brown, R. F. Hatch and K. E. … Brown of Hartford, and under the critical eye of V. M. Dorsey of Hartford and H. W. Carter of Owens. On April 19, 1926, Hatch wrote to Carter as follows (Ex.

Giaimo v. Pederson

193 F. Supp. 527 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jun 28, 1960

As was said in Sumio Madokoro v. … To the same effect is De Bernardo v. Rogers, 102 U.S.App.D.C. 382 , 254 F.2d 81 . See also In re Raimondi, D.C., 126 F.Supp. 390 ; Alves v. Shaughnessy, D.C., 107 F.Supp. 443 .